Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Lord Ashcroft’s promised CON-LD battleground polls could ei

SystemSystem Posts: 11,746
edited June 2014 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Lord Ashcroft’s promised CON-LD battleground polls could either take the pressure off Clegg or add to it

The 6% share for the Lib Dems in today’s YouGov/Sun poll is the lowest the firm has reported since it began its online operation in 2001. The party was just 1% ahead of the Greens.

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,972
    edited June 2014
    Next week's ICM is going to be crucial.

    Behind the Greens, low single digits, and the Lib Dems are going to turn into Frazer from Dad's Army
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,064
    Don't ICM like to take the real Lib Dem score and add about 5 to it though ?
  • Options
    SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,713
    Lord Ashcroft ‏@LordAshcroft · 12 secs
    My goodness! The early results of my polling in the Tory/Lib Dem battlefield marginals do look like......

    Such a c*** tease is the Lord..
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,972
    Pulpstar said:

    Don't ICM like to take the real Lib Dem score and add about 5 to it though ?

    No, they apply the spiral of silence adjustment, to the Tories, Lab and LD figures.

    It is one of the reasons why they are considered the Gold Standard.
  • Options
    SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,713

    Next week's ICM is going to be crucial.

    Behind the Greens, low single digits, and the Lib Dems are going to turn into Frazer from Dad's Army

    A mix of Frazer going 'We're doomed, we're doomed', and Jones going 'Don't Panic, don't Panic'.


  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Moeen Ali smashes a six over long on on test debut, good work
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited June 2014
    If the LDs were to win less than 10% at GE2015 it wouldn't matter about tactical voting or personal votes, they'd lose most of their MPs anyway. Those things only matter once you assume they get up to about 14-15%.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,972

    Next week's ICM is going to be crucial.

    Behind the Greens, low single digits, and the Lib Dems are going to turn into Frazer from Dad's Army

    A mix of Frazer going 'We're doomed, we're doomed', and Jones going 'Don't Panic, don't Panic'.


    Lord Oakeshott as Captain Mainwaring to Private Pike/Clegg: You stupid boy.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Pulpstar said:

    Don't ICM like to take the real Lib Dem score and add about 5 to it though ?

    They give them back half of DK.
  • Options
    MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    FPT.
    Famous last words 1.

    "We're leaving behind a SOVEREIGN, STABLE and SELF-RELIANT #IRAQ" @BarackObama 2 and a half years ago pic.twitter.com/BJRDTemUcm

    — Baghdad Invest (@baghdadinvest) June 12, 2014
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    If ICM has them declining too then the pressure will be up, however I don't expect anything before the conference season.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,064

    Lord Ashcroft ‏@LordAshcroft · 12 secs
    My goodness! The early results of my polling in the Tory/Lib Dem battlefield marginals do look like......

    Such a c*** tease is the Lord..

    It's either terrible news for the Tories or dreadful stuff for the Lib Dems.

    Or the fact that Labour could probably win a couple of these seats if their supporters actually stuck with the party - I predict there will be a seat or two that goes the way the tacticals don't want it to through tactical voting.

    Which seats he'll be doing I wonder...

    I've taken a smidgen of 5/4 about the Conservatives in St Ives. Interesting the price is that long even though the relative fortunes for the parties have been so different.

    Also will be instructive for the fortunes of Kevin Foster who I know personally in Torbay. His seat will be a key test of SW fortunes on the night.

    The assumption in the betting markets seems to be that the Lib Dem vote will hold up disproportionately well in the Con-LD marginals and that it will collapse completely in LD-Lab marginals.

    We'll get the answer to the first of these with the poll at any rate.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,730
    FPT

    GE2015 will be the LibDems' Singapore!

    :)
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,972

    FPT

    GE2015 will be the LibDems' Singapore!

    :)

    I blame the British-Indian Army for the fall of Singapore.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,565
    Interesting, I suspect that the Ashcroft poll will show a mixed picture in Con-LD seats.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,972
    Deputy Speaker Dawn Primarolo ordered Labour MP Ian Austin to "stand up", and then told him to "say sorry" after he referred to a Conservative MP as an "idiot".

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27814744
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,565
    Meanwhile whilst everyone is looking elsewhere it looks like things could be kicking off again in Ukraine

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-27815441
  • Options
    shadsyshadsy Posts: 289
    Anyone want to add to my list of top betting shocks in politics?
    http://politicalbookie.wordpress.com/2014/06/12/the-top-five-political-betting-shocks/

    I dunno if anyone has any examples of very big priced winners to become president or similar?
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited June 2014
    On Iraq, the americans have refused aid to Iraq, so Iraq's last option is to beg Iran.
    If ISIS captures Samara (they are besieging it right now) then Iran will probably give them all the military aid they like and even more.
    There are reports that ISIS is close to Baghdad International Airport, so currently the americans are preparing for this:

    pic.twitter.com/9i4zjsfrWN

    Iraq is currently too disorganised to launch any counteroffensive, they couldn't get a quorum in their parliament to declare a state of emergency, so far they are trying to defend Baghdad and break the siege of Samara.
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098

    FPT

    GE2015 will be the LibDems' Singapore!

    :)

    You mean it will emerge as a prosperous, clean (if slightly anti-septic), strictly-run but coherent party?
  • Options
    OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    AndyJS said:

    If the LDs were to win less than 10% at GE2015 it wouldn't matter about tactical voting or personal votes, they'd lose most of their MPs anyway. Those things only matter once you assume they get up to about 14-15%.

    7-8% would be about one-third of their 2010 general election vote and would equate to about 2.3 million votes nationwide.

    Tactical voting an personal votes would mean that the Lib Dems would probably hold roughly ten times as many seats as UKIP would with double the national vote share. That is they would make the conversion of votes into seats at least twenty times more efficient.

    Thirty seats at 20,000 votes per seat is 600k votes, say another thirty seats with an average 10,000 votes per seat and they would be looking at an average vote of 2,500 in the remaining 570 seats. So the Lib Dems could still hope to hold about half their current seats on a national share of less than 10%.

    Equally, if they drop down more equally to an average of 15,000 in the seats they currently hold then they could be left with less than ten seats on a national share of less than 10%.

    The fewer votes the Lib Dems take nationally the more important the distribution of those votes locally becomes.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,565

    Deputy Speaker Dawn Primarolo ordered Labour MP Ian Austin to "stand up", and then told him to "say sorry" after he referred to a Conservative MP as an "idiot".

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27814744

    It's not the first time Ian Austin has been upbraided for bad behaviour in the chamber.
  • Options
    SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,713
    Pulpstar said:

    Lord Ashcroft ‏@LordAshcroft · 12 secs
    My goodness! The early results of my polling in the Tory/Lib Dem battlefield marginals do look like......

    Such a c*** tease is the Lord..

    It's either terrible news for the Tories or dreadful stuff for the Lib Dems.

    Or the fact that Labour could probably win a couple of these seats if their supporters actually stuck with the party - I predict there will be a seat or two that goes the way the tacticals don't want it to through tactical voting.

    Which seats he'll be doing I wonder...

    I've taken a smidgen of 5/4 about the Conservatives in St Ives. Interesting the price is that long even though the relative fortunes for the parties have been so different.

    Also will be instructive for the fortunes of Kevin Foster who I know personally in Torbay. His seat will be a key test of SW fortunes on the night.

    The assumption in the betting markets seems to be that the Lib Dem vote will hold up disproportionately well in the Con-LD marginals and that it will collapse completely in LD-Lab marginals.

    We'll get the answer to the first of these with the poll at any rate.
    You have to go with terrible for the lib dems.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    ToryJim said:

    Meanwhile whilst everyone is looking elsewhere it looks like things could be kicking off again in Ukraine

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-27815441

    I'm not surprised, since the west has its hands full again with a crisis in the middle east, the russians can do what they like in their backyard.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    shadsy said:

    Anyone want to add to my list of top betting shocks in politics?
    http://politicalbookie.wordpress.com/2014/06/12/the-top-five-political-betting-shocks/

    I dunno if anyone has any examples of very big priced winners to become president or similar?

    Not sure the Pope Francis example really counts; when there are so many runners, it's not too surprising that one of the long-odds ones comes in - the hard bit is predicting which one.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    edited June 2014
    shadsy said:

    Anyone want to add to my list of top betting shocks in politics?
    http://politicalbookie.wordpress.com/2014/06/12/the-top-five-political-betting-shocks/

    I dunno if anyone has any examples of very big priced winners to become president or similar?

    There was the famous Morus tip here on Cathy Ashton to get the EU Foreign Affairs gig - from memory, it was something like 40/1. I saw the tip and thought, 'Nah, can't happen.. '
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    MikeK said:

    FPT.
    Famous last words 1.

    "We're leaving behind a SOVEREIGN, STABLE and SELF-RELIANT #IRAQ" @BarackObama 2 and a half years ago pic.twitter.com/BJRDTemUcm

    — Baghdad Invest (@baghdadinvest) June 12, 2014

    Are there any calls yet for Barry to hand back his Nobel Peace prize?
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,565

    MikeK said:

    FPT.
    Famous last words 1.

    "We're leaving behind a SOVEREIGN, STABLE and SELF-RELIANT #IRAQ" @BarackObama 2 and a half years ago pic.twitter.com/BJRDTemUcm

    — Baghdad Invest (@baghdadinvest) June 12, 2014
    Are there any calls yet for Barry to hand back his Nobel Peace prize?


    That's going to go down in history as a perfect example of jumping the gun.
  • Options
    OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Pulpstar said:

    I've taken a smidgen of 5/4 about the Conservatives in St Ives. Interesting the price is that long even though the relative fortunes for the parties have been so different.

    I think the Conservatives will probably take St Ives with a lower vote than they had when they came second in 2010. It's the sort of place where one expects UKIP will pile up a lot of votes in third place.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,565

    shadsy said:

    Anyone want to add to my list of top betting shocks in politics?
    http://politicalbookie.wordpress.com/2014/06/12/the-top-five-political-betting-shocks/

    I dunno if anyone has any examples of very big priced winners to become president or similar?

    There was the famous Morus tip here on Cathy Ashton to get the EU Foreign Affairs gig - from memory, it was something like 40/1. I saw the tip and thought, 'Nah, can't happen.. '
    Wasn't it 50/1, although I suspect that price didn't last long as pb punters waded in.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,220

    FPT

    GE2015 will be the LibDems' Singapore!

    :)

    You mean it will emerge as a prosperous, clean (if slightly anti-septic), strictly-run but coherent party?
    That would require the LibDems to come up with a beneficent dictator. I'm scouring the list of LibDem MPs, but so far....
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    Sir Roderick achieved a near miss.

    He was very secretive about his machinations but managed to get both continent and country right. Just ended up picking the wrong one of two cardinals.

    shadsy said:

    Anyone want to add to my list of top betting shocks in politics?
    http://politicalbookie.wordpress.com/2014/06/12/the-top-five-political-betting-shocks/

    I dunno if anyone has any examples of very big priced winners to become president or similar?

    Not sure the Pope Francis example really counts; when there are so many runners, it's not too surprising that one of the long-odds ones comes in - the hard bit is predicting which one.
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    I am not convinced that College travels to St. Ives to pick up votes.

    Pulpstar said:

    I've taken a smidgen of 5/4 about the Conservatives in St Ives. Interesting the price is that long even though the relative fortunes for the parties have been so different.

    I think the Conservatives will probably take St Ives with a lower vote than they had when they came second in 2010. It's the sort of place where one expects UKIP will pile up a lot of votes in third place.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100

    AndyJS said:

    If the LDs were to win less than 10% at GE2015 it wouldn't matter about tactical voting or personal votes, they'd lose most of their MPs anyway. Those things only matter once you assume they get up to about 14-15%.

    7-8% would be about one-third of their 2010 general election vote and would equate to about 2.3 million votes nationwide.

    Tactical voting an personal votes would mean that the Lib Dems would probably hold roughly ten times as many seats as UKIP would with double the national vote share. That is they would make the conversion of votes into seats at least twenty times more efficient.

    Thirty seats at 20,000 votes per seat is 600k votes, say another thirty seats with an average 10,000 votes per seat and they would be looking at an average vote of 2,500 in the remaining 570 seats. So the Lib Dems could still hope to hold about half their current seats on a national share of less than 10%.

    Equally, if they drop down more equally to an average of 15,000 in the seats they currently hold then they could be left with less than ten seats on a national share of less than 10%.

    The fewer votes the Lib Dems take nationally the more important the distribution of those votes locally becomes.
    On that theory the LD can keep 30 seats with just 2% of the vote nationally, in practice it doesn't work.
    The LD currently get 1.8 million votes on 6%, for the 20k in 30 seats, 10k in 30 seats and 2,5k in 570 you need 2.925 million votes.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,064

    shadsy said:

    Anyone want to add to my list of top betting shocks in politics?
    http://politicalbookie.wordpress.com/2014/06/12/the-top-five-political-betting-shocks/

    I dunno if anyone has any examples of very big priced winners to become president or similar?

    Not sure the Pope Francis example really counts; when there are so many runners, it's not too surprising that one of the long-odds ones comes in - the hard bit is predicting which one.
    Utter lottery. Did Betfair do a market on it or was it all Paddy.

    Lay the favourite is probably a decent strategy there.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    edited June 2014

    New Ladbrokes markets: that 25/1 CON in D&G is a total no-brainer-> fill your pockets!!!

    Dunfermline & West Fife
    Labour 1/20
    SNP 10/1
    Liberal Democrats 20/1

    Dumfries & Galloway
    Labour1/50
    SNP 25/1
    Conservatives 25/1

    Glasgow North
    Labour 1/25
    SNP 10/1
    Liberal Democrats 25/1

    That's ludicrously generous in D and G given that the Tories won the Euro vote there. Shadsy's on a giveaway day,
    It is not often we see Shadsy in charitable mood. Cograts to those lucky, early punters that climbed on CON at 25/1 (!!) in Dumfries & Galloway. Now in to 12/1. LAB now at 1/25 (from 1/50). Still PLENTY of value left there.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    shadsy said:

    Anyone want to add to my list of top betting shocks in politics?
    http://politicalbookie.wordpress.com/2014/06/12/the-top-five-political-betting-shocks/

    I dunno if anyone has any examples of very big priced winners to become president or similar?

    There was the famous Morus tip here on Cathy Ashton to get the EU Foreign Affairs gig - from memory, it was something like 40/1. I saw the tip and thought, 'Nah, can't happen.. '
    Don't forget Mr Llama's healthy profits on +Fulham and ++Canterbury
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,220
    I think the phrase his Lordship is grasping for is "blood-bath"....

    I wonder if any there are any classics scholars on here? Perhaps one of them could find a suitable example from history to suggest the impending doom facing the LibDems...?

    My own rather less historical analysis references a dock-side hooker.....
  • Options
    BobaFettBobaFett Posts: 2,789
    The Good Lord's tweet suggests Armageddon for the Liberals.

    I wonder whether a dire Ashcroft poll will be enough to shake them out of their stupor?
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    ToryJim said:

    Interesting, I suspect that the Ashcroft poll will show a mixed picture in Con-LD seats.

    Since CON have fallen 5% since last time and the LD have fallen by 16% on average, that will be about 20 CON gains from the LD, anything less and that might be trouble for the Tories since they really need those seats.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,064

    New Ladbrokes markets: that 25/1 CON in D&G is a total no-brainer-> fill your pockets!!!

    Dunfermline & West Fife
    Labour 1/20
    SNP 10/1
    Liberal Democrats 20/1

    Dumfries & Galloway
    Labour1/50
    SNP 25/1
    Conservatives 25/1

    Glasgow North
    Labour 1/25
    SNP 10/1
    Liberal Democrats 25/1

    That's ludicrously generous in D and G given that the Tories won the Euro vote there. Shadsy's on a giveaway day,
    It is not often we see Shadsy in charitable mood. Cograts to those lucky, early punters that climbed on CON at 25/1 (!!) in Dumfries & Galloway. Now in to 12/1. LAB now at 1/25 (from 1/50). Still PLENTY of value left there.
    I've had another look and can't see it in the Constituency markets.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    BobaFett said:

    The Good Lord's tweet suggests Armageddon for the Liberals.

    I wonder whether a dire Ashcroft poll will be enough to shake them out of their stupor?

    No, its ICM or bust for them.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited June 2014
    LD votes by constituency, 2010:

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0At91c3wX1Wu5dGtQck5wOU5mN1lQSjIydkZRQTNWbFE&usp=sheets_web#gid=0

    Just 22 seats where their share was less than 10%.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,064
    Gah I've found it. What a ghastly way to set out the markets, in a right hand pane.

    Here I was thinking it might be listed in actual alphabetical order.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    Speedy said:

    @Speedy - You forgot the Scottish LibDems who have gone to the SNP.

    Whether this is reversible or not, and whether the collapse will actually happen in the areas of LibDem strength, remains to be seen. Their vote in their strongest areas is holding reasonably well (in some cases very well) in local elections. I think they will end up doing quite a bit better than the polls currently suggest, but still very badly compared with recent GEs.

    Having said that, I recently heard some surprising reports of what is happening in what I'd always assumed was a rock-solid English LibDem seat, and which is not on anyone's target list. At the very least it sounded as though the majority will be slashed.

    I think they split 3 ways there too, with some going to the Tories and some to UKIP.

    Basically any LD seat is under threat at these levels.
    The Scottish Liberal Democrat vote has split 7 ways, in roughly this order:

    SNP
    SLab
    Staying SLD
    Grn
    SCon
    abstainers
    UKIP

    Obviously, the pattern of dispersal varies widely. In Orkney & Shetland (and it may be unique in this respect) the Staying SLD group may be largest. In Inverclyde it has almost all gone SLab or SNP. In Edinburgh it has gone all over the place, especially to Green.

    Richard Nabavi - "Having said that, I recently heard some surprising reports of what is happening in what I'd always assumed was a rock-solid English LibDem seat, and which is not on anyone's target list. At the very least it sounded as though the majority will be slashed."

    Ominous. UK GE 2015 could turn into a real stunner if totally "safe" LD seats start to tumble.
  • Options
    dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,291
    Tanks getting lost, crossing a border to see night life in Ukraine.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-27815441

    Someone is playing very silly buggers.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557

    Morning all
    passport gate will hurt the Tories. You can get away with Austerity as long as you don't interfere with Joe Bloggs annual lobsterisation in some god awful dive in Europe.

    Dyed Woolie election and Sindy update

    SIndy - No 51.5 Yes 48.5, race tightening.
    GE 2015
    Lab 300
    Tory 285
    Lib Dem 20
    UKIP 4
    Green 2
    NI and Nats 39 (SNP to gain a hatful)

    Ed Miliband is Primeminister of a minority government, back to the polls 2016

    YES 48.5%

    Nats 39 seats (+30 seats)

    Yikes. That punter who put 400,000 GBP on NO at 1/4 will be feeling a tad nervous ;)
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,565

    I think the phrase his Lordship is grasping for is "blood-bath"....

    I wonder if any there are any classics scholars on here? Perhaps one of them could find a suitable example from history to suggest the impending doom facing the LibDems...?

    My own rather less historical analysis references a dock-side hooker.....

    Perhaps the Battle of Changping where the state of Zhao was tricked by the state oh Qin and 400,000 Zhao troops were then buried alive in the ensuing catastrophe ;)
  • Options
    OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    It's one of the places that UKIP saved their deposit in 2010, which they didn't manage in Newark, Eastleigh, Wythenshawe, etc. They also came top in Cornwall in the Euro elections.

    It's possible to see UKIP picking up perhaps as many as 60,000 votes in Cornwall at the next GE and coming third in all six seats.
    AveryLP said:

    I am not convinced that College travels to St. Ives to pick up votes.

    Pulpstar said:

    I've taken a smidgen of 5/4 about the Conservatives in St Ives. Interesting the price is that long even though the relative fortunes for the parties have been so different.

    I think the Conservatives will probably take St Ives with a lower vote than they had when they came second in 2010. It's the sort of place where one expects UKIP will pile up a lot of votes in third place.
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited June 2014
    ὁ κλαυθμὸς καὶ ὁ βρυγμὸς τῶν ὀδόντων

    After the vote went against them there was much weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth.

    Biblical ancient Greek, as glossed by 'The King's English':

    “Weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth” is the awful fate of those consigned to “outer darkness.”

    Let’s consider the words more closely:

    Weeping/Wailing: The Greek lexicons speak of “bitter crying” and “lamentation.” There is the deep sadness of mourning (e.g. Matthew 2:18) as well as self-recrimination – think of Peter’s weeping following his denials (Matthew 26:75). It is closely connected with the lament “Alas! Alas!” (Revelation 18:15-19). It is the cry of the hopeless (Revelation 5:4) and yet, through the triumph of Jesus, His people will be brought to the place where we “weep not!” There will be no such weeping in the new heavens and new earth (Isaiah 65:19). However the “outer darkness” is a place of continual weeping and wailing. And also gnashing of teeth…

    Gnashing of teeth: This is consistently a description of anger in Scripture. The miserable comforters “gnash their teeth” at righteous Job. The wicked gnash their teeth at the righteous one of Psalm 35 (v15). They gnash their teeth at Stephen before stoning him (Acts 7:54). Outer darkness is a place of violent fury.

    Put these two terms together and you get a grotesque portrait of humanity. Hell is self-pitying, self-righteous anger, stretching on into eternity. The damned cry bitter tears and grind their teeth in fury. Sullen self-pity and furious self-righteousness grow in the outer darkness.

    I think the phrase his Lordship is grasping for is "blood-bath"....

    I wonder if any there are any classics scholars on here? Perhaps one of them could find a suitable example from history to suggest the impending doom facing the LibDems...?

    My own rather less historical analysis references a dock-side hooker.....

  • Options
    QuincelQuincel Posts: 3,994
    I hope the LD vote isn't too near the Greens in any more polls. The last thing we need is this place becoming about crossover again...
  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    In Martin's honour..."Taxi for the lib dems!"
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    Quincel said:

    I hope the LD vote isn't too near the Greens in any more polls. The last thing we need is this place becoming about crossover again...

    I'm looking forward to Shadsy's Lib Dem / Green vote share matched bet prices.

  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,641

    I think the phrase his Lordship is grasping for is "blood-bath"....

    I wonder if any there are any classics scholars on here? Perhaps one of them could find a suitable example from history to suggest the impending doom facing the LibDems...?

    My own rather less historical analysis references a dock-side hooker.....

    Personally I suspect and fear that the Lib Dems may become a classic example of the phrase "Be careful what you wish for." They wanted a Coalition for decades and getting it is in serious danger of destroying them.

    They don't deserve it. They have given the country 4 years so far of stable and necessary government allowing at least an initial recovery from the Labour car crash. But it is looking increasingly likely they are going to be hammered.

  • Options
    bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 8,179
    Mike, you were saying how you were sceptical of the IndyRef poll with a second question "if certain DC would remain PM". I can understand why. By asking a supplemental question like that, you are indicating to the respondent that you expect them to give a different answer and that whatever was in your conditional clause is what they should be focusing on.

    But don't those same criticisms apply to a second question asking the respondent to focus on their specific seat? Doesn't the question order then exaggerate the local effect?

    A better method would be to have a single question, but the single question to be worded with a focus on the local seat.
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    AveryLP said:

    [snip]

    Put these two terms together and you get a grotesque portrait of humanity. Hell is self-pitying, self-righteous anger, stretching on into eternity. The damned cry bitter tears and grind their teeth in fury. Sullen self-pity and furious self-righteousness grow in the outer darkness.

    But you can't write a head-line using that - needs to be more pithy..!

    I think the phrase his Lordship is grasping for is "blood-bath"....

    I wonder if any there are any classics scholars on here? Perhaps one of them could find a suitable example from history to suggest the impending doom facing the LibDems...?

    My own rather less historical analysis references a dock-side hooker.....

  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Well AveryLP that didn't take long for them to find pilots.

    From the guardian live feed:
    "Following on from the comments below by Ali Abu Tiba from the Al-Naqshabandiyia resistance movement in Mosul, Reuters reports that a militant parade of captured Humvee vehicles in the city also included two captured helicopters flying overhead. It was, the agency reported, the first time Isis-allied forces have seized aircraft."
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited June 2014
    UKIP's problem in Cornwall is that there is a substantial middle-class, eco-green vote in most of the constituencies which means they find it easy to get up to 20% but difficult thereafter. Most likely result is they poll 20-30% in all the seats and don't win any of them.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,064
    If you think the Good Lord's poll indicates a bloodbath for the Lib Dems then the Conservatives are 9-4 in Torbay.

    I've gone in for £25.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,972
    edited June 2014

    I think the phrase his Lordship is grasping for is "blood-bath"....

    I wonder if any there are any classics scholars on here? Perhaps one of them could find a suitable example from history to suggest the impending doom facing the LibDems...?

    My own rather less historical analysis references a dock-side hooker.....

    As PB's pre-eminent Classical History Scholar, the Lib Dems and Clegg right now must feel like Emperor Valerian, after the Battle of Edessa.

    Lost, the battle, went to negotiate peace, was betrayed by the other side, captured and used as a human foot stool for the rest of his life.

    But it could be like the Battle of Ipsus for the Lib Dems in 2015.
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,565
    Greece sues for 7bn euros over submarines it never needed. This article makes odd and convoluted reading.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/10895239/Greece-sues-for-7-billion-euros-over-German-submarines-that-have-never-sailed.html
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,641
    Well if it was Sri Lanka's morning it has been England's afternoon. Pretty even going into the final session but the mo seems to be with England at the moment. Excellent debut from Ali.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    DavidL said:

    I think the phrase his Lordship is grasping for is "blood-bath"....

    I wonder if any there are any classics scholars on here? Perhaps one of them could find a suitable example from history to suggest the impending doom facing the LibDems...?

    My own rather less historical analysis references a dock-side hooker.....

    Personally I suspect and fear that the Lib Dems may become a classic example of the phrase "Be careful what you wish for." They wanted a Coalition for decades and getting it is in serious danger of destroying them.

    They don't deserve it. They have given the country 4 years so far of stable and necessary government allowing at least an initial recovery from the Labour car crash. But it is looking increasingly likely they are going to be hammered.

    They went in for power's sake, everyone can see it that they prefer the ministerial limos than their policies, their voters or even their future existence.
    It's what they say: "You can never tell what a person's character is until you give them power"
  • Options
    AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621

    I think the phrase his Lordship is grasping for is "blood-bath"....

    I wonder if any there are any classics scholars on here? Perhaps one of them could find a suitable example from history to suggest the impending doom facing the LibDems...?

    My own rather less historical analysis references a dock-side hooker.....

    As PB's pre-eminent Classical Scholar, the Lib Dems and Clegg right now must feel like Emperor Valerian, after the Battle of Edessa.

    Lost, the battle, went to negotiate peace, was betrayed by the other side, captured and used as a human foot stool for the rest of his life.
    Then skinned alive and the skin stuffed and mounted. Nice.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    shadsy said:

    Anyone want to add to my list of top betting shocks in politics?
    http://politicalbookie.wordpress.com/2014/06/12/the-top-five-political-betting-shocks/

    I dunno if anyone has any examples of very big priced winners to become president or similar?

    If memory serves me correctly the longest priced UK GE seat winner in 2010 (going on prices the day before polling) was Naomi Long (Alliance), who defeated Peter Robinson (DUP) by 4 points in Belfast East. She was 14/1.

    One of my winning bets at the Scottish GE in 2011 was John Mason (SNP) in Glasgow Shettleston by 2 points. I got 50 quid on him at 25/1. He had been at 50/1. I wish I'd got on the SNP in Glasgow Anniesland!
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited June 2014
    O/T:

    "I'm turning into a grumpy old woman - aged just 31
    In a world where we don't switch off, we're getting more stressed out earlier than ever, says Rebecca Holman

    But what started out as a response to stress and a busy life has made me a grumpy old woman at 31. I’ve become the cynic and the pessimist you have to talk around if you want to change the evening plans. The idea of ‘playing it by ear,’ ‘just seeing what happens’ or indeed going to a crowded bar unless I know I’m going to get a seat, is not an option. Adverts on TV make me cross because I feel like I’m being conned, RAG week students on the tube leave me sour-faced and muttering under my breath, and I’m sure you can imagine how I feel about restaurants with a no-reservation policy.

    My friends think it’s a phase - I’ll chill out when my life chills out, and go back to my chilled-out old self, but I’m not so sure. I think this is just the way I am now. I’ve become just the sort of ‘grown up’ (don’t laugh) I always vowed I’d never become - inflexible and difficult, far more concerned about how everything affects me than how my behaviour affects everyone else around me. "


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-health/10864366/Im-turning-into-a-grumpy-old-woman-aged-just-31.html
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,972
    shadsy said:

    Anyone want to add to my list of top betting shocks in politics?
    http://politicalbookie.wordpress.com/2014/06/12/the-top-five-political-betting-shocks/

    I dunno if anyone has any examples of very big priced winners to become president or similar?

    Wasn't Tennessee going Republican in 2000 also a bit of a shock?
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,972
    Anorak said:

    I think the phrase his Lordship is grasping for is "blood-bath"....

    I wonder if any there are any classics scholars on here? Perhaps one of them could find a suitable example from history to suggest the impending doom facing the LibDems...?

    My own rather less historical analysis references a dock-side hooker.....

    As PB's pre-eminent Classical Scholar, the Lib Dems and Clegg right now must feel like Emperor Valerian, after the Battle of Edessa.

    Lost, the battle, went to negotiate peace, was betrayed by the other side, captured and used as a human foot stool for the rest of his life.
    Then skinned alive and the skin stuffed and mounted. Nice.
    Reminds me of Unlucky Alf from the Fast Show.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    ToryJim said:

    Greece sues for 7bn euros over submarines it never needed. This article makes odd and convoluted reading.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/10895239/Greece-sues-for-7-billion-euros-over-German-submarines-that-have-never-sailed.html

    The greek government must be behind in the opinion polls.
  • Options
    OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Speedy said:

    AndyJS said:

    If the LDs were to win less than 10% at GE2015 it wouldn't matter about tactical voting or personal votes, they'd lose most of their MPs anyway. Those things only matter once you assume they get up to about 14-15%.

    7-8% would be about one-third of their 2010 general election vote and would equate to about 2.3 million votes nationwide.

    Tactical voting an personal votes would mean that the Lib Dems would probably hold roughly ten times as many seats as UKIP would with double the national vote share. That is they would make the conversion of votes into seats at least twenty times more efficient.

    Thirty seats at 20,000 votes per seat is 600k votes, say another thirty seats with an average 10,000 votes per seat and they would be looking at an average vote of 2,500 in the remaining 570 seats. So the Lib Dems could still hope to hold about half their current seats on a national share of less than 10%.

    Equally, if they drop down more equally to an average of 15,000 in the seats they currently hold then they could be left with less than ten seats on a national share of less than 10%.

    The fewer votes the Lib Dems take nationally the more important the distribution of those votes locally becomes.
    On that theory the LD can keep 30 seats with just 2% of the vote nationally, in practice it doesn't work.
    The LD currently get 1.8 million votes on 6%, for the 20k in 30 seats, 10k in 30 seats and 2,5k in 570 you need 2.925 million votes.
    It totals to about 2.3 million votes, as I said. You've added an extra 600k in. 2.3 million votes would equate to about one-third of their vote in 2010.

    My proposition does not extend to the Lib Dems holding 30 seats on 2% of the vote, which is a very different thing to holding 30 seats on 8%. The former is absurd, whereas the latter is possible if their vote is sufficiently concentrated.. Worth remembering the 1997 general election when the Lib Dems lost votes but more than doubled the number of seats held.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,972
    Fabregas signs for Chelsea
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,641
    Speedy said:

    DavidL said:

    I think the phrase his Lordship is grasping for is "blood-bath"....

    I wonder if any there are any classics scholars on here? Perhaps one of them could find a suitable example from history to suggest the impending doom facing the LibDems...?

    My own rather less historical analysis references a dock-side hooker.....

    Personally I suspect and fear that the Lib Dems may become a classic example of the phrase "Be careful what you wish for." They wanted a Coalition for decades and getting it is in serious danger of destroying them.

    They don't deserve it. They have given the country 4 years so far of stable and necessary government allowing at least an initial recovery from the Labour car crash. But it is looking increasingly likely they are going to be hammered.

    They went in for power's sake, everyone can see it that they prefer the ministerial limos than their policies, their voters or even their future existence.
    It's what they say: "You can never tell what a person's character is until you give them power"

    I think that is harsh. I still believe that far too few people recognise just how close we were to the precipice in 2010. Darling, in fairness did, but the Captain was full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes.

    Without a stable government we could have been facing the collapse of our banking system, our currency and our economy. What the Lib Dems did they did in the national interest even if the cars and the preening was an attraction too.
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited June 2014
    "Outer darkness" would be the head-line.

    The gloss just sets its biblical and ancient Greek context. Once glossed the meaning of the 'cliché' is enriched by its allusions.

    The alternative of quoting the ancient Greek in modern media would be too much even for Boris. I suppose the "weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth" translation could substitute though.

    I still prefer "outer darkness". It is the ring of hell in which the Lib Dems will find themselves. The weeping, wailing and gnashing bit is all they will be able to get up to there.

    AveryLP said:

    [snip]

    Put these two terms together and you get a grotesque portrait of humanity. Hell is self-pitying, self-righteous anger, stretching on into eternity. The damned cry bitter tears and grind their teeth in fury. Sullen self-pity and furious self-righteousness grow in the outer darkness.

    But you can't write a head-line using that - needs to be more pithy..!

    I think the phrase his Lordship is grasping for is "blood-bath"....

    I wonder if any there are any classics scholars on here? Perhaps one of them could find a suitable example from history to suggest the impending doom facing the LibDems...?

    My own rather less historical analysis references a dock-side hooker.....

  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    edited June 2014
    Pulpstar said:

    If you think the Good Lord's poll indicates a bloodbath for the Lib Dems then the Conservatives are 9-4 in Torbay.

    I've gone in for £25.

    Torbay is, in simple percentage-majority terms, the 25th most vulnerable LibDem seat, so it wouldn't even necessarily take a bloodbath. They could easily lose it and still be on over 30 seats. So those are very respectable odds compared with Shadsy's LibDem line of 33.5.

    I'm on!
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,118

    Quincel said:

    I hope the LD vote isn't too near the Greens in any more polls. The last thing we need is this place becoming about crossover again...

    I'm looking forward to Shadsy's Lib Dem / Green vote share matched bet prices.

    UKIP 5/4 to bt the LD's must still be value with Hillbillys
  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    AndyJS said:
    Argh!
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited June 2014

    Speedy said:

    AndyJS said:

    If the LDs were to win less than 10% at GE2015 it wouldn't matter about tactical voting or personal votes, they'd lose most of their MPs anyway. Those things only matter once you assume they get up to about 14-15%.

    7-8% would be about one-third of their 2010 general election vote and would equate to about 2.3 million votes nationwide.

    Tactical voting an personal votes would mean that the Lib Dems would probably hold roughly ten times as many seats as UKIP would with double the national vote share. That is they would make the conversion of votes into seats at least twenty times more efficient.

    Thirty seats at 20,000 votes per seat is 600k votes, say another thirty seats with an average 10,000 votes per seat and they would be looking at an average vote of 2,500 in the remaining 570 seats. So the Lib Dems could still hope to hold about half their current seats on a national share of less than 10%.

    Equally, if they drop down more equally to an average of 15,000 in the seats they currently hold then they could be left with less than ten seats on a national share of less than 10%.

    The fewer votes the Lib Dems take nationally the more important the distribution of those votes locally becomes.
    On that theory the LD can keep 30 seats with just 2% of the vote nationally, in practice it doesn't work.
    The LD currently get 1.8 million votes on 6%, for the 20k in 30 seats, 10k in 30 seats and 2,5k in 570 you need 2.925 million votes.
    It totals to about 2.3 million votes, as I said. You've added an extra 600k in. 2.3 million votes would equate to about one-third of their vote in 2010.

    My proposition does not extend to the Lib Dems holding 30 seats on 2% of the vote, which is a very different thing to holding 30 seats on 8%. The former is absurd, whereas the latter is possible if their vote is sufficiently concentrated.. Worth remembering the 1997 general election when the Lib Dems lost votes but more than doubled the number of seats held.
    True I made an error on double counting those 30 seats, however that is still half a million votes more than with 6%, that's the point, they have fallen so low that even the Zulu strategy is suffering.
    On 1997 LD lost only 1% but gained plenty of Tory seats on a 5.5% swing plus tactical voting.
    This time its the LD that are losing more votes with a 5.5% swing to the Tories however tactical voting might still be there but what is the difference between the LD and CON these days?
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,060
    Good afternoon, everyone.

    EU may classify being fat as a disability:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-27809242

  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,972

    Pulpstar said:

    If you think the Good Lord's poll indicates a bloodbath for the Lib Dems then the Conservatives are 9-4 in Torbay.

    I've gone in for £25.

    Torbay is, in simple percentage-majority terms, the 25th most vulnerable LibDem seat, so it wouldn't even necessarily take a bloodbath. They could easily lose it and still be on over 30 seats. So those are very respectable odds compared with Shadsy's LibDem line of 33.5.

    I'm on!
    Me too
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,972
    I've also just backed Croatia to win tonight at 14/1
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    What time is Lord A's pollls available?
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,565

    Good afternoon, everyone.

    EU may classify being fat as a disability:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-27809242

    Mr Dancer that would be madder than a very mad thing
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    edited June 2014
    awesome time for sport. WC, Cricket, US open golf, All blacks V England Saturday, Boks V Wales, Queen's tennis....

    peachy.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100

    I've also just backed Croatia to win tonight at 14/1

    I backed nil nil on half time.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,386
    AndyJS said:

    If the LDs were to win less than 10% at GE2015 it wouldn't matter about tactical voting or personal votes, they'd lose most of their MPs anyway. Those things only matter once you assume they get up to about 14-15%.

    Yes: at 15-16%, and given the rise of UKIP, the LibDems keep the bulk (perhaps 40) of their seats.

    At 8% or below, they'll be sharing a taxi. And it won't be a people carrier one, either.

    I continue to think Charles Kennedy for next leader is the best way to play LibDemaggedon. Sub 8% means very, very few MPs (at 8%, it will be 3-to-4) , of which CK will definitely be one. Hard to see how he won't be leader under these circumstances. 50-1 is clear value.
  • Options
    OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Speedy said:

    Speedy said:

    7-8% would be about one-third of their 2010 general election vote and would equate to about 2.3 million votes nationwide.

    Tactical voting an personal votes would mean that the Lib Dems would probably hold roughly ten times as many seats as UKIP would with double the national vote share. That is they would make the conversion of votes into seats at least twenty times more efficient.

    Thirty seats at 20,000 votes per seat is 600k votes, say another thirty seats with an average 10,000 votes per seat and they would be looking at an average vote of 2,500 in the remaining 570 seats. So the Lib Dems could still hope to hold about half their current seats on a national share of less than 10%.

    Equally, if they drop down more equally to an average of 15,000 in the seats they currently hold then they could be left with less than ten seats on a national share of less than 10%.

    The fewer votes the Lib Dems take nationally the more important the distribution of those votes locally becomes.

    On that theory the LD can keep 30 seats with just 2% of the vote nationally, in practice it doesn't work.
    The LD currently get 1.8 million votes on 6%, for the 20k in 30 seats, 10k in 30 seats and 2,5k in 570 you need 2.925 million votes.
    It totals to about 2.3 million votes, as I said. You've added an extra 600k in. 2.3 million votes would equate to about one-third of their vote in 2010.

    My proposition does not extend to the Lib Dems holding 30 seats on 2% of the vote, which is a very different thing to holding 30 seats on 8%. The former is absurd, whereas the latter is possible if their vote is sufficiently concentrated.. Worth remembering the 1997 general election when the Lib Dems lost votes but more than doubled the number of seats held.
    True I made an error on double counting those 30 seats, however that is still half a million votes more than with 6%, that's the point, they have fallen so low that even the Zulu strategy is suffering.
    On 1997 LD lost only 1% but gained plenty of Tory seats on a 5.5% swing plus tactical voting.
    This time its the LD that are losing more votes with a 5.5% swing to the Tories however tactical voting might still be there but what is the difference between the LD and CON these days?
    I never mentioned the 6% figure. In my post I also pointed out that if their vote is just a bit more spread out they could end up with less than ten seats.

    My point being that at that vote level - just below 10% - it is only local concentration of the Lib Dem vote, due to tactical voting and personal votes, that matters at all. It matters a lot more than when they are on ~20% of the vote.
  • Options
    GrandioseGrandiose Posts: 2,323
    ToryJim said:

    Good afternoon, everyone.

    EU may classify being fat as a disability:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-27809242

    Mr Dancer that would be madder than a very mad thing
    As mad as it would be, I do not think it likely that the ECJ will so hold. In the case of Sonia Chacón Navas, they rejected illness as a ground of discrimination covered by the Framework Directive; in other words, that it did not fall within the meaning of the term "disability".
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,064
    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    If the LDs were to win less than 10% at GE2015 it wouldn't matter about tactical voting or personal votes, they'd lose most of their MPs anyway. Those things only matter once you assume they get up to about 14-15%.

    Yes: at 15-16%, and given the rise of UKIP, the LibDems keep the bulk (perhaps 40) of their seats.

    At 8% or below, they'll be sharing a taxi. And it won't be a people carrier one, either.

    I continue to think Charles Kennedy for next leader is the best way to play LibDemaggedon. Sub 8% means very, very few MPs (at 8%, it will be 3-to-4) , of which CK will definitely be one. Hard to see how he won't be leader under these circumstances. 50-1 is clear value.
    Farron & Carmichael will be two of the others I think.

    Made up the £25 to £50 on the back of Nabavi & TSE following me in, £50 on for my Dad too !
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Ali goes for 48.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 21,034
    edited June 2014
    Speedy said:

    BobaFett said:

    The Good Lord's tweet suggests Armageddon for the Liberals.

    I wonder whether a dire Ashcroft poll will be enough to shake them out of their stupor?

    No, its ICM or bust for them.
    Yeah, ICM did Ming in - When the October 2007 poll took Lib-Dem's down to 14%, that was curtains for Ming;

    http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/voting-intention-2/icm

    What the Lib's would give to polling 14% now of course... :^O

  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    If the LDs were to win less than 10% at GE2015 it wouldn't matter about tactical voting or personal votes, they'd lose most of their MPs anyway. Those things only matter once you assume they get up to about 14-15%.

    Yes: at 15-16%, and given the rise of UKIP, the LibDems keep the bulk (perhaps 40) of their seats.

    At 8% or below, they'll be sharing a taxi. And it won't be a people carrier one, either.

    I continue to think Charles Kennedy for next leader is the best way to play LibDemaggedon. Sub 8% means very, very few MPs (at 8%, it will be 3-to-4) , of which CK will definitely be one. Hard to see how he won't be leader under these circumstances. 50-1 is clear value.
    Charlie Kennedy to be next LD leader was 85/1 on Betfair this morning. Now 47/1. Somebody clearly thinks that LibDemaggedon is a distinct possibility.

    Mind you, Kennedy would also require a No result in September, and he has hardly lifted a finger to help Darling's BeTory Together outfit.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,060
    Mr. Jim, good job the EU has such a great track record on common sense and not piling up needless regulation.
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    What should really alarm the Lib Dems more than anything else is the results in the South West in the Euro elections. There is a huge cluster of seats there where the Lib Dems have slim majorities over the Tories. I had previously been assuming they would hold onto a huge number of those seats (partly because I thought LD voters would be sticky there due to it being their heartland, and because I thought Tory voters there would be particularly susceptible to UKIP) ... in actual fact, the LD->Tory swing there was one of the biggest of any region.

    If that is borne out next year, the Lib Dems being reduced to <20 seats is a very realistic possibility.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,118
    AndyJS said:

    Ali goes for 48.

    Eurgh I just put up £50 @EVS to lay ENG and didnt get matched.. 20 odd for 5 on this pitch isnt good, Lanka look biig at 7/2
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,565
    Mr Dancer, well quite.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited June 2014
    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    If the LDs were to win less than 10% at GE2015 it wouldn't matter about tactical voting or personal votes, they'd lose most of their MPs anyway. Those things only matter once you assume they get up to about 14-15%.

    Yes: at 15-16%, and given the rise of UKIP, the LibDems keep the bulk (perhaps 40) of their seats.

    At 8% or below, they'll be sharing a taxi. And it won't be a people carrier one, either.

    I continue to think Charles Kennedy for next leader is the best way to play LibDemaggedon. Sub 8% means very, very few MPs (at 8%, it will be 3-to-4) , of which CK will definitely be one. Hard to see how he won't be leader under these circumstances. 50-1 is clear value.
    True, Charles Kennedy might be the only LD heavyweight left.
    He will probably keep his seat since he was ousted 9 years ago for the ridiculous charge of binge drinking not for policy, he is a lefty and not in the coalition and helds the title of the most popular LD leader.

    After the car crash of the coalition, he will probably take over.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Prior in trouble first ball with an LBW review.
This discussion has been closed.