Skip to content

The challenge for the… Green parties – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,677
edited September 8 in General
The challenge for the… Green parties – politicalbetting.com

This is the penultimate in a series looking at the 7 main Great Britain parties. The main focus will be on the Green Party of England and Wales, but we’ll also look at the separate Scottish Greens.

Read the full story here

«1345

Comments

  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 44,968
    First
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 44,968
    FPT
    Stereodog said:

    » show previous quotes
    I really don't think the public care that Starmer has no outward charisma. His massive problem is that he can't inspire any loyalty or even fear amongst his cabinet and MPs. I think that Starmer's resemblance to Ted Heath grows each day he is in office but at least Heath inspired fierce loyalty among his lieutenants and fear on the back benches.

    He is like a wet blanket , no -one would want to be stuck with him. Like a grey cardboard cutout of a less able John Major.
    I reckon he models himself on Roy from Corrie , minus the shopping bag.
  • A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 44,968
    Take 2 seconds on Scottish Greens, just needs "bunch of Fcuk witted useless loonies".
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 11,814
    edited September 8

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    "Just asking questions". Will be interesting to see Farage's response - he's been remarkably astute as to where the line is for bampottery on other issues.

    (I think he has already backtracked to an extent but if it becomes a meme among the Reform faithful he's going to have some trouble. Anti-vaxxers are not malleable).
  • eekeek Posts: 31,231

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    It's also worth saying that the opposite of that was true - if Farage had kept the lunatic element away from public view he would be walking the next election as the "lets give this lot a try" option..
  • DopermeanDopermean Posts: 1,553

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    Importantly though not death for the older, vaccinated people, death for young people whose parents/guardians don't get them vaccinated.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 16,085

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    They don’t need to win the election to have that effect. Simply by giving this nonsense the airtime they will already be doing so. Though US social media will continue to bear the greatest blame.
  • Anti-migrant protester who ‘wanted to protect kids’ is a paedophile

    The YouTuber Anthony Styles is a child sex offender who was sentenced to four and half years in jail after indecently assaulting a schoolgirl


    https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/anti-migrant-protester-convicted-paedophile-dxl03wnjg
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,054
    Another fine article from GOTV.

    And a mischievous sense of humour: ..If the Scottish Greens aspire to greatness..
  • A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    I mentioned on here a few weeks ago as my father's ex-colleagues will tell you the most aggresive antivaxxers they meet are the sort of people you'd expect to vote Reform/WWC.

    It'll start showing up in the stats soon as they destroy herd immunity.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 44,968
    Dopermean said:

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    Importantly though not death for the older, vaccinated people, death for young people whose parents/guardians don't get them vaccinated.
    Always some bitter and twisted halfwitted spotty youth who hates "old people", get a life loser.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,054
    This is interesting.

    Huge AI tech deal in Europe:

    > Semiconductor machine maker ASML (Netherlands) is Europe’s 2nd largest company at $307B (behind SAP at $313B)

    > France’s Mistral is raising $2B at at $14B valuation and is Europe’s top AI startup

    > ASML is chipping in $1.5B of the $2B and is now the top shareholder in Mistral (which is building its own foundation mode and has chatbot Le Chat)

    https://x.com/bearlyai/status/1964747167631024173

    Is euro-tech waking up ?

  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 45,455
    Nigelb said:

    Another fine article from GOTV.

    And a mischievous sense of humour: ..If the Scottish Greens aspire to greatness..

    It's not an unreasonable comment. At the moment they can only hope to influence within a consortium or an otherwise hung parliament.

    But when things get worse environmentally, and Reform are still spouting their anti-climate change agenda?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 56,358
    Just the Conservatives to go, so that is all the major parties covered then?
  • malcolmg said:

    Take 2 seconds on Scottish Greens, just needs "bunch of Fcuk witted useless loonies".

    Well do support Scottish independence, so I agree with your analysis.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,054

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    I mentioned on here a few weeks ago as my father's ex-colleagues will tell you the most aggresive antivaxxers they meet are the sort of people you'd expect to vote Reform/WWC.

    It'll start showing up in the stats soon as they destroy herd immunity.
    It can take quite a while to really show through in numbers of cases.
    Measles will be the quickest, thanks to its extreme infectiousness.

    But the virtual elimination of some childhood diseases - including, as we're seeing in the US, polio - is under threat.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 45,455
    malcolmg said:

    Dopermean said:

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    Importantly though not death for the older, vaccinated people, death for young people whose parents/guardians don't get them vaccinated.
    Always some bitter and twisted halfwitted spotty youth who hates "old people", get a life loser.
    Hello Malcy! I read the comment as being critical of Reform voters/antivaxxers not oldies in general.

    I'd also add, perhaps even worse, complications from viruses - measles can infect old folk still as well as young people and children and cause some very nasty complications such as blindness and encephalitis.

    What I don't know is how much even previously vaccinated oldies are at risk once herd immunity is gone thanks to those idiots.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 56,358
    edited September 8
    Carnyx said:

    Nigelb said:

    Another fine article from GOTV.

    And a mischievous sense of humour: ..If the Scottish Greens aspire to greatness..

    It's not an unreasonable comment. At the moment they can only hope to influence within a consortium or an otherwise hung parliament.

    But when things get worse environmentally, and Reform are still spouting their anti-climate change agenda?
    The catastrophic recycling plan which is going to cost Scottish taxpayers millions in damages, the dead of the undualled A9 and A96, the self destructive policies on not exploiting our remaining resources in the North Sea, it is really hard to think of anything positive about the Green's contribution to the Scottish government. And that is before we even go near the Trans fiasco.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 9,232
    Nigelb said:

    This is interesting.

    Huge AI tech deal in Europe:

    > Semiconductor machine maker ASML (Netherlands) is Europe’s 2nd largest company at $307B (behind SAP at $313B)

    > France’s Mistral is raising $2B at at $14B valuation and is Europe’s top AI startup

    > ASML is chipping in $1.5B of the $2B and is now the top shareholder in Mistral (which is building its own foundation mode and has chatbot Le Chat)

    https://x.com/bearlyai/status/1964747167631024173

    Is euro-tech waking up ?

    ASML, the European tech giant you've never heard of. Son in Barcelona was just given the heave-ho by HP after 20 years (and a US software patent to his name), is now taking up a job in an ASML joint venture spinout with Barcelona University

  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,054
    Carnyx said:

    Nigelb said:

    Another fine article from GOTV.

    And a mischievous sense of humour: ..If the Scottish Greens aspire to greatness..

    It's not an unreasonable comment. At the moment they can only hope to influence within a consortium or an otherwise hung parliament.

    But when things get worse environmentally, and Reform are still spouting their anti-climate change agenda?
    Haven't they yet to crack 10% of the vote ?
    And as Gareth points out, the other parties not on the right tick some of the green boxes too.
  • eekeek Posts: 31,231
    Carnyx said:

    malcolmg said:

    Dopermean said:

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    Importantly though not death for the older, vaccinated people, death for young people whose parents/guardians don't get them vaccinated.
    Always some bitter and twisted halfwitted spotty youth who hates "old people", get a life loser.
    Hello Malcy! I read the comment as being critical of Reform voters/antivaxxers not oldies in general.

    I'd also add, perhaps even worse, complications from viruses - measles can infect old folk still as well as young people and children and cause some very nasty complications such as blindness and encephalitis.

    What I don't know is how much even previously vaccinated oldies are at risk once herd immunity is gone thanks to those idiots.
    Google's AI tells me if you were born between 1957 and 1968 you have a problem (prior to 57 you will have survived it, post 68 the vaccines offered immunity).
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,054
    edited September 8
    Carnyx said:

    malcolmg said:

    Dopermean said:

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    Importantly though not death for the older, vaccinated people, death for young people whose parents/guardians don't get them vaccinated.
    Always some bitter and twisted halfwitted spotty youth who hates "old people", get a life loser.
    Hello Malcy! I read the comment as being critical of Reform voters/antivaxxers not oldies in general.

    I'd also add, perhaps even worse, complications from viruses - measles can infect old folk still as well as young people and children and cause some very nasty complications such as blindness and encephalitis.

    What I don't know is how much even previously vaccinated oldies are at risk once herd immunity is gone thanks to those idiots.
    Measles is particularly nasty as it attacks immune memory, so can remove existing immunity against other diseases.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,054
    edited September 8
    geoffw said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is interesting.

    Huge AI tech deal in Europe:

    > Semiconductor machine maker ASML (Netherlands) is Europe’s 2nd largest company at $307B (behind SAP at $313B)

    > France’s Mistral is raising $2B at at $14B valuation and is Europe’s top AI startup

    > ASML is chipping in $1.5B of the $2B and is now the top shareholder in Mistral (which is building its own foundation mode and has chatbot Le Chat)

    https://x.com/bearlyai/status/1964747167631024173

    Is euro-tech waking up ?

    ASML, the European tech giant you've never heard of. Son in Barcelona was just given the heave-ho by HP after 20 years (and a US software patent to his name), is now taking up a job in an ASML joint venture spinout with Barcelona University

    Isn't it really US/European, as the X-ray technology came from Cymer ?

    Also, no love for my subtle visual pun ?
  • DeclanFDeclanF Posts: 73
    The Greens are full of loons who talk the most unscientific nonsense on everything bar, occasionally, climate issues and their influence in Scottish politics has been utterly worthless and dangerous.

    The main challenge for them is finding some sensible grown ups to run and represent their party.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 56,358
    Nigelb said:

    Carnyx said:

    malcolmg said:

    Dopermean said:

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    Importantly though not death for the older, vaccinated people, death for young people whose parents/guardians don't get them vaccinated.
    Always some bitter and twisted halfwitted spotty youth who hates "old people", get a life loser.
    Hello Malcy! I read the comment as being critical of Reform voters/antivaxxers not oldies in general.

    I'd also add, perhaps even worse, complications from viruses - measles can infect old folk still as well as young people and children and cause some very nasty complications such as blindness and encephalitis.

    What I don't know is how much even previously vaccinated oldies are at risk once herd immunity is gone thanks to those idiots.
    Measles is particularly nasty as it attacks immune memory, so can remove existing immunity against other diseases.
    Really? I have never heard of that. That is fascinating.
  • Nigelb said:

    geoffw said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is interesting.

    Huge AI tech deal in Europe:

    > Semiconductor machine maker ASML (Netherlands) is Europe’s 2nd largest company at $307B (behind SAP at $313B)

    > France’s Mistral is raising $2B at at $14B valuation and is Europe’s top AI startup

    > ASML is chipping in $1.5B of the $2B and is now the top shareholder in Mistral (which is building its own foundation mode and has chatbot Le Chat)

    https://x.com/bearlyai/status/1964747167631024173

    Is euro-tech waking up ?

    ASML, the European tech giant you've never heard of. Son in Barcelona was just given the heave-ho by HP after 20 years (and a US software patent to his name), is now taking up a job in an ASML joint venture spinout with Barcelona University

    Isn't it really US/European, as the X-ray technology came from Cymer ?

    Also, no love for my subtle visual pun ?
    I was about to ask, is that your cat?
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 9,232
    Nigelb said:

    geoffw said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is interesting.

    Huge AI tech deal in Europe:

    > Semiconductor machine maker ASML (Netherlands) is Europe’s 2nd largest company at $307B (behind SAP at $313B)

    > France’s Mistral is raising $2B at at $14B valuation and is Europe’s top AI startup

    > ASML is chipping in $1.5B of the $2B and is now the top shareholder in Mistral (which is building its own foundation mode and has chatbot Le Chat)

    https://x.com/bearlyai/status/1964747167631024173

    Is euro-tech waking up ?

    ASML, the European tech giant you've never heard of. Son in Barcelona was just given the heave-ho by HP after 20 years (and a US software patent to his name), is now taking up a job in an ASML joint venture spinout with Barcelona University

    Isn't it really US/European, as the X-ray technology came from Cymer ?
    Dunno, I was surprised to find out that such a crucial bit of global tech was right here on our dorstep in the Netherlands. Certainly some of their tech originates in the US because it is subject to export controls in selling stuff to China

  • DeclanF said:

    The Greens are full of loons who talk the most unscientific nonsense on everything bar, occasionally, climate issues and their influence in Scottish politics has been utterly worthless and dangerous.

    The main challenge for them is finding some sensible grown ups to run and represent their party.

    The Greens kind of tried that and didn't enjoy it.

    Hence hypnoboobs.

    Same dynamic as most other political parties.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 10,841
    Carnyx said:

    malcolmg said:

    Dopermean said:

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    Importantly though not death for the older, vaccinated people, death for young people whose parents/guardians don't get them vaccinated.
    Always some bitter and twisted halfwitted spotty youth who hates "old people", get a life loser.
    Hello Malcy! I read the comment as being critical of Reform voters/antivaxxers not oldies in general.

    I'd also add, perhaps even worse, complications from viruses - measles can infect old folk still as well as young people and children and cause some very nasty complications such as blindness and encephalitis.

    What I don't know is how much even previously vaccinated oldies are at risk once herd immunity is gone thanks to those idiots.
    Presumably the increased incidence of live virus in the community means the vaccinated oldies are challenged more. Given the vaccine isn’t 100% effective that means more infections
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 45,455

    Carnyx said:

    malcolmg said:

    Dopermean said:

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    Importantly though not death for the older, vaccinated people, death for young people whose parents/guardians don't get them vaccinated.
    Always some bitter and twisted halfwitted spotty youth who hates "old people", get a life loser.
    Hello Malcy! I read the comment as being critical of Reform voters/antivaxxers not oldies in general.

    I'd also add, perhaps even worse, complications from viruses - measles can infect old folk still as well as young people and children and cause some very nasty complications such as blindness and encephalitis.

    What I don't know is how much even previously vaccinated oldies are at risk once herd immunity is gone thanks to those idiots.
    Presumably the increased incidence of live virus in the community means the vaccinated oldies are challenged more. Given the vaccine isn’t 100% effective that means more infections
    Just so.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 45,455
    edited September 8
    Nigelb said:

    geoffw said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is interesting.

    Huge AI tech deal in Europe:

    > Semiconductor machine maker ASML (Netherlands) is Europe’s 2nd largest company at $307B (behind SAP at $313B)

    > France’s Mistral is raising $2B at at $14B valuation and is Europe’s top AI startup

    > ASML is chipping in $1.5B of the $2B and is now the top shareholder in Mistral (which is building its own foundation mode and has chatbot Le Chat)

    https://x.com/bearlyai/status/1964747167631024173

    Is euro-tech waking up ?

    ASML, the European tech giant you've never heard of. Son in Barcelona was just given the heave-ho by HP after 20 years (and a US software patent to his name), is now taking up a job in an ASML joint venture spinout with Barcelona University

    Isn't it really US/European, as the X-ray technology came from Cymer ?

    Also, no love for my subtle visual pun ?
    Tigerish. I did spot it, honest.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 29,761
    edited September 8
    Let me start with a question. Since 2010, the Green Party of England and Wales has had 7 leaders or co-leaders, how many can you name?

    That's a good question. Let me try off the top of my head.

    Zack Polanski.
    Caroline Lucas.
    Natalie Bennett, who I knew from Britblog Roundup, who crashed a little in the media.
    Jonathon Bartley, who was co-chair of the Ekklesia thinktank.
    Adrian Ramsey, who I too easily get confused with Adam Ramsey who used to edit Bright Green Scotland, and who came from a castle, and who's dad released beavers onto his huge estate (30k acres iirc, which is ~30 sqiare miles) in Scotland.
    And two others.

    Was one of the others the woman who stood for London Mayor, and had been involved in activism against "Plonkers in Tonkas" (my phrase) ?
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 30,630

    Anti-migrant protester who ‘wanted to protect kids’ is a paedophile

    The YouTuber Anthony Styles is a child sex offender who was sentenced to four and half years in jail after indecently assaulting a schoolgirl


    https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/anti-migrant-protester-convicted-paedophile-dxl03wnjg

    Well.
    It was all projection.
    Whoever would have thought it?
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 30,630
    eek said:

    Carnyx said:

    malcolmg said:

    Dopermean said:

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    Importantly though not death for the older, vaccinated people, death for young people whose parents/guardians don't get them vaccinated.
    Always some bitter and twisted halfwitted spotty youth who hates "old people", get a life loser.
    Hello Malcy! I read the comment as being critical of Reform voters/antivaxxers not oldies in general.

    I'd also add, perhaps even worse, complications from viruses - measles can infect old folk still as well as young people and children and cause some very nasty complications such as blindness and encephalitis.

    What I don't know is how much even previously vaccinated oldies are at risk once herd immunity is gone thanks to those idiots.
    Google's AI tells me if you were born between 1957 and 1968 you have a problem (prior to 57 you will have survived it, post 68 the vaccines offered immunity).
    As one born in 1966, the vast majority of my school year group survived it.
  • isamisam Posts: 42,576
    edited September 8
    Nigelb said:

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    I mentioned on here a few weeks ago as my father's ex-colleagues will tell you the most aggresive antivaxxers they meet are the sort of people you'd expect to vote Reform/WWC.

    It'll start showing up in the stats soon as they destroy herd immunity.
    It can take quite a while to really show through in numbers of cases.
    Measles will be the quickest, thanks to its extreme infectiousness.

    But the virtual elimination of some childhood diseases - including, as we're seeing in the US, polio - is under threat.
    Most of my friends were anti-vaxxers when it came to covid, and they were/are quite vocal about it, but I’ve never heard any of them say they wouldn’t/didn’t vaccinate their kids from measles etc

    Maybe associating Reform with anti vax quackery will encourage the ethnic minorities, who are the major group of vaccine refuseniks, to give them a go

    Could be that WWC types have to have their elders/religious gurus make leaflets for them to tell them not to be scared soon, a la the Muslim Council of Britain

    https://mcb.org.uk/resources/opvac/


  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 45,455
    edited September 8
    DeclanF said:

    The Greens are full of loons who talk the most unscientific nonsense on everything bar, occasionally, climate issues and their influence in Scottish politics has been utterly worthless and dangerous.

    The main challenge for them is finding some sensible grown ups to run and represent their party.

    Not entirely true. For instance, Andy Wightman has done valuable work on land ownership and access, and related issues such as Common Good (so he got right up the nose of the Tory Landowners but also of the Labour urban mafias). But eventually they got rid of him ...
  • MattWMattW Posts: 29,761

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    Perhaps those left in the Tories will on average be politically saner *?

    Reform does seem to be hoovering up the Tory failures and the BNP retreads.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 8,022
    I think there is a tipping point with Reform where if enough people become aware of the crazy, it will hit support. Despite all the comparisons the UK is not quite the states yet where everything is excused dependant on one’s overall worldview (though it is skating perilously close to the edge).

    But I’d just let these things feed into general public discourse through osmosis: I wouldn’t, as a political party, go particularly hard on it. Just highlight it and leave it there for people to realise the nuttiness.
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 6,251

    I think there is a tipping point with Reform where if enough people become aware of the crazy, it will hit support. Despite all the comparisons the UK is not quite the states yet where everything is excused dependant on one’s overall worldview (though it is skating perilously close to the edge).

    But I’d just let these things feed into general public discourse through osmosis: I wouldn’t, as a political party, go particularly hard on it. Just highlight it and leave it there for people to realise the nuttiness.

    I think it needs to be hammered now by the other parties. They need to peel away the softer Reform support before that becomes more entrenched .
  • isamisam Posts: 42,576
    edited September 8
    People criticise the BBC etc for giving Reform too much airtime, but here we are, twenty comments into a thread about the Green Party, and everyone’s talking about Reform. Why would the media be any different?

    Actually a study published in yesterdays independent/i paper showed Farage wasn’t on mainstream tv more than other politicians. He wasn’t even the top Reformer

    Nigel Farage is not given more airtime on TV than other politicians, an academic study has found

    https://x.com/theipaper/status/1964723531616284787?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 8,022
    nico67 said:

    I think there is a tipping point with Reform where if enough people become aware of the crazy, it will hit support. Despite all the comparisons the UK is not quite the states yet where everything is excused dependant on one’s overall worldview (though it is skating perilously close to the edge).

    But I’d just let these things feed into general public discourse through osmosis: I wouldn’t, as a political party, go particularly hard on it. Just highlight it and leave it there for people to realise the nuttiness.

    I think it needs to be hammered now by the other parties. They need to peel away the softer Reform support before that becomes more entrenched .
    I think hammering it will have the opposite effect. We have seen elsewhere that attempts to combat right wing populism are cast as the establishment trying to entrench its position etc, they are masters at playing to this narrative.

    Far better to highlight it, and then let people create their own doubt, than to go too hard on it.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 29,761
    On Zack Polanski, he is impressively well presented but becomes questionable once the surface is scratched. Imo he's less questionable than the Reformista bigwigs, because he at least has principles rather than nihilism.

    On Hypnoboobs (which is a good quip) I not sure whether to look down for on him or his customers more. He was 30, and Harley Street is an epicentre of both quackery and the enablement of criminality - did not Mohammed Al Fayed have his victims pre-inspected there?

    Perhaps he should have used blue pyramids?
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 45,455
    isam said:

    People criticise the BBC etc for giving Reform too much airtime, but here we are, twenty comments into a thread about the Green Party, and everyone’s talking about Reform. Why would the media be any different?

    Actually a study published in yesterdays independent/i paper showed Farage wasn’t on mainstream tv more than other politicians. He wasn’t even the top Reformer

    Nigel Farage is not given more airtime on TV than other politicians, an academic study has found

    https://x.com/theipaper/status/1964723531616284787?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    Paywalled. But what time does it cover? Pre-Reform or Reform? And does it weight for numbers of MP/MSP/MS/MLA or voters?
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,198
    edited September 8
    isam said:

    People criticise the BBC etc for giving Reform too much airtime, but here we are, twenty comments into a thread about the Green Party, and everyone’s talking about Reform. Why would the media be any different?

    Actually a study published in yesterdays independent/i paper showed Farage wasn’t on mainstream tv more than other politicians. He wasn’t even the top Reformer

    Nigel Farage is not given more airtime on TV than other politicians, an academic study has found

    https://x.com/theipaper/status/1964723531616284787?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    All depends on the narrative of that airtime. Labour had loads of airtime on Friday and it was ALL bad ( justifiably so). On Saturday there was lots of airtime for Reform and it was for the most part a fawning love in, not only by GeeBeebies but especially by the BBC too.

    In opposition Labour had their feet held to the fire "this isn't costed", " that will mean tax rises", " why will you stop work from 6pm Friday until 8.30 on a Monday if you become PM?"

    With Farage his every word is taken at face value.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 45,455
    edited September 8
    MattW said:

    On Zack Polanski, he is impressively well presented but becomes questionable once the surface is scratched. Imo he's less questionable than the Reformista bigwigs, because he at least has principles rather than nihilism.

    On Hypnoboobs (which is a good quip) I not sure whether to look down for on him or his customers more. He was 30, and Harley Street is an epicentre of both quackery and the enablement of criminality - did not Mohammed Al Fayed have his victims pre-inspected there?

    Perhaps he should have used blue pyramids?

    At least, like the original 19th century homoeopathy in an era of massive adulteration and over-prescribing of dangerous "drugs", his, erm, cosmetic surgery would have avoided actually doing harm of the kind seen in the sort that uses the scalpel (other than, of course, the general issue of confirming and reinforcing dissatisfaction with body image etc. which is universal to the field).
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,054
    DavidL said:

    Nigelb said:

    Carnyx said:

    malcolmg said:

    Dopermean said:

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    Importantly though not death for the older, vaccinated people, death for young people whose parents/guardians don't get them vaccinated.
    Always some bitter and twisted halfwitted spotty youth who hates "old people", get a life loser.
    Hello Malcy! I read the comment as being critical of Reform voters/antivaxxers not oldies in general.

    I'd also add, perhaps even worse, complications from viruses - measles can infect old folk still as well as young people and children and cause some very nasty complications such as blindness and encephalitis.

    What I don't know is how much even previously vaccinated oldies are at risk once herd immunity is gone thanks to those idiots.
    Measles is particularly nasty as it attacks immune memory, so can remove existing immunity against other diseases.
    Really? I have never heard of that. That is fascinating.
    Discovered in the last decade.

    Measles erases immune ‘memory’ for other diseases
    Results from tests of unvaccinated children and monkeys come as measles cases spike around the world.
    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03324-7
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,178

    isam said:

    People criticise the BBC etc for giving Reform too much airtime, but here we are, twenty comments into a thread about the Green Party, and everyone’s talking about Reform. Why would the media be any different?

    Actually a study published in yesterdays independent/i paper showed Farage wasn’t on mainstream tv more than other politicians. He wasn’t even the top Reformer

    Nigel Farage is not given more airtime on TV than other politicians, an academic study has found

    https://x.com/theipaper/status/1964723531616284787?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    All depends on the narrative of that airtime. Labour had loads of airtime on Friday and it was ALL bad ( justifiably so). On Saturday there was lots of airtime for Reform and it was for the most part a fawning love in, not only by GeeBeebies but especially by the BBC too.
    Eye of the beholder and all that.

    Still expecting Starmer in the dock at the Hague?
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 46,994
    MattW said:

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    Perhaps those left in the Tories will on average be politically saner *?

    Reform does seem to be hoovering up the Tory failures and the BNP retreads.
    It's worse than that: the Farage Party are turning Tory failures into BNP types.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 16,050
    MattW said:

    On Zack Polanski, he is impressively well presented but becomes questionable once the surface is scratched. Imo he's less questionable than the Reformista bigwigs, because he at least has principles rather than nihilism.

    On Hypnoboobs (which is a good quip) I not sure whether to look down for on him or his customers more. He was 30, and Harley Street is an epicentre of both quackery and the enablement of criminality - did not Mohammed Al Fayed have his victims pre-inspected there?

    Perhaps he should have used blue pyramids?

    I'm excited by the reference to blue pyramids, which I'm choosing to infer is a reference to the Great Pyramid of Stockport - which is where ZP went to school - but I don't fully understand it. So I expect my inference is wrong...?
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 11,814
    edited September 8
    isam said:

    Nigelb said:

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    These asshats are going to further reduce vaccination rates of all sorts in this country, and lead to lots of disease and deaths as a result.

    Vote Farage Party, vote death!
    I mentioned on here a few weeks ago as my father's ex-colleagues will tell you the most aggresive antivaxxers they meet are the sort of people you'd expect to vote Reform/WWC.

    It'll start showing up in the stats soon as they destroy herd immunity.
    It can take quite a while to really show through in numbers of cases.
    Measles will be the quickest, thanks to its extreme infectiousness.

    But the virtual elimination of some childhood diseases - including, as we're seeing in the US, polio - is under threat.
    Most of my friends were anti-vaxxers when it came to covid, and they were/are quite vocal about it, but I’ve never heard any of them say they wouldn’t/didn’t vaccinate their kids from measles etc

    Maybe associating Reform with anti vax quackery will encourage the ethnic minorities, who are the major group of vaccine refuseniks, to give them a go

    Could be that WWC types have to have their elders/religious gurus make leaflets for them to tell them not to be scared soon, a la the Muslim Council of Britain

    https://mcb.org.uk/resources/opvac/


    I think you're on to something - there are other startling similarities between Reform and Islamic fundamentalism, and we've already had a policy that sees a Reform government send billions to the Taliban.

    (In Scotland our jag rates are pretty consistent across ethnicity; a small drop off for African & Caribbean/Black).
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,054
    geoffw said:

    Nigelb said:

    geoffw said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is interesting.

    Huge AI tech deal in Europe:

    > Semiconductor machine maker ASML (Netherlands) is Europe’s 2nd largest company at $307B (behind SAP at $313B)

    > France’s Mistral is raising $2B at at $14B valuation and is Europe’s top AI startup

    > ASML is chipping in $1.5B of the $2B and is now the top shareholder in Mistral (which is building its own foundation mode and has chatbot Le Chat)

    https://x.com/bearlyai/status/1964747167631024173

    Is euro-tech waking up ?

    ASML, the European tech giant you've never heard of. Son in Barcelona was just given the heave-ho by HP after 20 years (and a US software patent to his name), is now taking up a job in an ASML joint venture spinout with Barcelona University

    Isn't it really US/European, as the X-ray technology came from Cymer ?
    Dunno, I was surprised to find out that such a crucial bit of global tech was right here on our dorstep in the Netherlands. Certainly some of their tech originates in the US because it is subject to export controls in selling stuff to China

    Back in 2013.
    https://www.asml.com/en/news/press-releases/2013/asml-completes-acquisition-of-cymer

    The optics and engineering are European, I think. Cymer developed the technology to blast minute droplets of molten tin with a laser, 50,000 times every second.
    https://www.asml.com/en/technology/lithography-principles/light-and-lasers
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 35,688
    edited September 8
    isam said:

    People criticise the BBC etc for giving Reform too much airtime, but here we are, twenty comments into a thread about the Green Party, and everyone’s talking about Reform. Why would the media be any different?

    Actually a study published in yesterdays independent/i paper showed Farage wasn’t on mainstream tv more than other politicians. He wasn’t even the top Reformer

    Nigel Farage is not given more airtime on TV than other politicians, an academic study has found

    https://x.com/theipaper/status/1964723531616284787?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    A quote from the Journal of Irreproducible Results?
  • MattWMattW Posts: 29,761
    Carnyx said:

    isam said:

    People criticise the BBC etc for giving Reform too much airtime, but here we are, twenty comments into a thread about the Green Party, and everyone’s talking about Reform. Why would the media be any different?

    Actually a study published in yesterdays independent/i paper showed Farage wasn’t on mainstream tv more than other politicians. He wasn’t even the top Reformer

    Nigel Farage is not given more airtime on TV than other politicians, an academic study has found

    https://x.com/theipaper/status/1964723531616284787?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    Paywalled. But what time does it cover? Pre-Reform or Reform? And does it weight for numbers of MP/MSP/MS/MLA or voters?
    I can read it, and I am not a subscriber.

    However analysis of party representation across flagship TV political programmes by Cardiff University’s School of Journalism, Media and Culture, found Farage appeared less frequently on flagship political shows last year, “contrary to long-standing claims that Nigel Farage is allocated more frequent appearances than other politicians on programmes such as Question Time”.

    The study is here; it's political TV not news:
    https://www.enhancingimpartiality.com/blog/interpreting-impartiality

    We conducted an analysis of guests selected across five of the UK’s most prominent political discussion programmes, including Any Questions (BBC Radio 4), Peston (ITV), Question Time (BBC), Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg (BBC) and Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips (Sky News).
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 67,891

    A few months ago I met up with a political strategist who knows a thing or two about winning general elections and they said the best way to stop Reform winning a general election was for the public to see them as a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists mostly, things like this and lauding Lucy Connolly will seal the deal.

    NEW: Linden Kemkaran, the Reform UK leader of Kent County Council, tells @TimesRadio the party should consider an inquiry into a possible link between the Covid vaccine and cancer.

    Comes after Dr Aseem Malhotra told the Reform conference the jab gave the Royal Family cancer.


    https://x.com/KevinASchofield/status/1964733148434182451

    Labour also need to prepare a blitz on economics nearer the election. The public need to be warned that Farage and co will follow all sorts of bonkers Trump 2.0 ideas on economics. For example, bank of england back under the PM's control for interest rate setting.

    Inflation control will be out of the window.

    We will all be a lot poorer.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 40,173
    MattW said:

    Reform does seem to be hoovering up the Tory failures and the BNP retreads.

    Yup, RETREAD would be a more appropriate name for them
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 15,448
    isam said:

    People criticise the BBC etc for giving Reform too much airtime, but here we are, twenty comments into a thread about the Green Party, and everyone’s talking about Reform. Why would the media be any different?

    Actually a study published in yesterdays independent/i paper showed Farage wasn’t on mainstream tv more than other politicians. He wasn’t even the top Reformer

    Nigel Farage is not given more airtime on TV than other politicians, an academic study has found

    https://x.com/theipaper/status/1964723531616284787?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    The Green Party isn't going to run the country so the interest must be elsewhere. It fails to generate interest in two ways.

    Some of its policies aren't going to happen anyway, they are both extreme and lack popular support, so it's only for anoraks.

    And there is a complex, boring and long term green agenda going ahead about electricity, insulation, housing standards, farming, landscape transport, boilers. It is necessary, complicated and dull. The sense that some Greens want us to reurn to the good old days of the ninth century isn't needed or wanted.

    There is also the fact that outside specifically 'Green' issues its politics is unrealistic leftism, attractive only to a few, and its seats and target seats are full of single issue fanatics who don't agree with each other let alone the rest of us. And I suspect a large proportion of activists believe in MMT economics.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,054

    Nigelb said:

    geoffw said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is interesting.

    Huge AI tech deal in Europe:

    > Semiconductor machine maker ASML (Netherlands) is Europe’s 2nd largest company at $307B (behind SAP at $313B)

    > France’s Mistral is raising $2B at at $14B valuation and is Europe’s top AI startup

    > ASML is chipping in $1.5B of the $2B and is now the top shareholder in Mistral (which is building its own foundation mode and has chatbot Le Chat)

    https://x.com/bearlyai/status/1964747167631024173

    Is euro-tech waking up ?

    ASML, the European tech giant you've never heard of. Son in Barcelona was just given the heave-ho by HP after 20 years (and a US software patent to his name), is now taking up a job in an ASML joint venture spinout with Barcelona University

    Isn't it really US/European, as the X-ray technology came from Cymer ?

    Also, no love for my subtle visual pun ?
    I was about to ask, is that your cat?
    Le Chat ?
    Mais oui.
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 6,640
    DavidL said:

    Carnyx said:

    Nigelb said:

    Another fine article from GOTV.

    And a mischievous sense of humour: ..If the Scottish Greens aspire to greatness..

    It's not an unreasonable comment. At the moment they can only hope to influence within a consortium or an otherwise hung parliament.

    But when things get worse environmentally, and Reform are still spouting their anti-climate change agenda?
    The catastrophic recycling plan which is going to cost Scottish taxpayers millions in damages, the dead of the undualled A9 and A96, the self destructive policies on not exploiting our remaining resources in the North Sea, it is really hard to think of anything positive about the Green's contribution to the Scottish government. And that is before we even go near the Trans fiasco.
    Having seen the damage the Greens caused when they were influencing government, I’m not sure whether Reform could be even worse. I fear we may find out in due course.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 67,891
    edited September 8
    Thanks @GarethoftheVale2 - useful header summary of the Greens.

    Huddersfield is an interesting example as I think I'm in saying it represents a really good example of what Ramsey has been saying about electoral strategy: the Greens win seats in areas where they have spent years building a reputation on local government. Kirklees was one of the first councils anywhere with Greens on it I think. It's slow steady work. And involves very tightly focusing limited resources. It's a model of course the Liberals have used for years.

    Polanski has argued - it seems successfully in the leader poll - that this is all far too slow.

    It will be interesting in 2028/9 but me thinks Ramsey will be proved the better strategist.


  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,198
    edited September 8

    isam said:

    People criticise the BBC etc for giving Reform too much airtime, but here we are, twenty comments into a thread about the Green Party, and everyone’s talking about Reform. Why would the media be any different?

    Actually a study published in yesterdays independent/i paper showed Farage wasn’t on mainstream tv more than other politicians. He wasn’t even the top Reformer

    Nigel Farage is not given more airtime on TV than other politicians, an academic study has found

    https://x.com/theipaper/status/1964723531616284787?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    All depends on the narrative of that airtime. Labour had loads of airtime on Friday and it was ALL bad ( justifiably so). On Saturday there was lots of airtime for Reform and it was for the most part a fawning love in, not only by GeeBeebies but especially by the BBC too.
    Eye of the beholder and all that.

    Still expecting Starmer in the dock at the Hague?
    Watch Chris Mason's analysis of the Conference. It's not "eye of the beholder" stuff. And have you ever seen TalkTV or GBNews?

    I don't suppose Starmer will make it to the Hague. I was merely repeating the thoughts of Your Party, and for once I don't wholly disagree with them, specifically Starmer's tacit role over the imposed famine on the population of Gaza. Now you are going to come back to me with a "but what about Hamas...?"
  • isamisam Posts: 42,576
    Carnyx said:

    isam said:

    People criticise the BBC etc for giving Reform too much airtime, but here we are, twenty comments into a thread about the Green Party, and everyone’s talking about Reform. Why would the media be any different?

    Actually a study published in yesterdays independent/i paper showed Farage wasn’t on mainstream tv more than other politicians. He wasn’t even the top Reformer

    Nigel Farage is not given more airtime on TV than other politicians, an academic study has found

    https://x.com/theipaper/status/1964723531616284787?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    Paywalled. But what time does it cover? Pre-Reform or Reform? And does it weight for numbers of MP/MSP/MS/MLA or voters?
    You can read it if you accept ads
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 6,251
    edited September 8
    MattW said:

    Carnyx said:

    isam said:

    People criticise the BBC etc for giving Reform too much airtime, but here we are, twenty comments into a thread about the Green Party, and everyone’s talking about Reform. Why would the media be any different?

    Actually a study published in yesterdays independent/i paper showed Farage wasn’t on mainstream tv more than other politicians. He wasn’t even the top Reformer

    Nigel Farage is not given more airtime on TV than other politicians, an academic study has found

    https://x.com/theipaper/status/1964723531616284787?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    Paywalled. But what time does it cover? Pre-Reform or Reform? And does it weight for numbers of MP/MSP/MS/MLA or voters?
    I can read it, and I am not a subscriber.

    However analysis of party representation across flagship TV political programmes by Cardiff University’s School of Journalism, Media and Culture, found Farage appeared less frequently on flagship political shows last year, “contrary to long-standing claims that Nigel Farage is allocated more frequent appearances than other politicians on programmes such as Question Time”.

    The study is here; it's political TV not news:
    https://www.enhancingimpartiality.com/blog/interpreting-impartiality

    We conducted an analysis of guests selected across five of the UK’s most prominent political discussion programmes, including Any Questions (BBC Radio 4), Peston (ITV), Question Time (BBC), Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg (BBC) and Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips (Sky News).
    That doesn’t include news items, interviews on the news and print media so I think it’s missing a lot .
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,054

    Thanks @GarethoftheVale2 - useful header summary of the Greens.

    Huddersfield is an interesting example as I think I'm in saying it represents a really good example of what Ramsey has been saying about electoral strategy: the Greens win seats in areas where they have spent years building a reputation on local government. Kirklees was one of the first councils anywhere with Greens on it I think. It's slow steady work. And involves very tightly focusing limited resources. It's a model of course the Liberals have used for years.

    Polanski has argued - it seems successfully in the leader poll - that this is all far too slow.

    It will be interesting in 2028/9 but me thinks Ramsey will be proved the better strategist.

    I think that's right. The Labour council in Kirklees are pretty poor (something that tends to happen when a party has been in control for too long), and some of the Green councillors sensible pragmatists.

    The national party is far less convincing.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 15,448

    I think there is a tipping point with Reform where if enough people become aware of the crazy, it will hit support. Despite all the comparisons the UK is not quite the states yet where everything is excused dependant on one’s overall worldview (though it is skating perilously close to the edge).

    But I’d just let these things feed into general public discourse through osmosis: I wouldn’t, as a political party, go particularly hard on it. Just highlight it and leave it there for people to realise the nuttiness.

    There multiple ways in which Reform don't form/lead the next government. The 60-65% who really don't want this need to work on them.

    Being found out as nasty natured charlatans and chancers who have policies that are both contradictory and crazy, with huge silences over every really hard questions and little talent would be a start.

    The next would be for other parties (the Tories have a big choice here, and look like making the wrong one) to get a lot better at centrist politics and for government to start getting better at doing its job so that tactical voting by the 60% who don't want Reform can be credible and effective.

    The Tory choice? Is to say that they would rather be in coalition with Labour than with Reform.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 29,761
    edited September 8
    Cookie said:

    MattW said:

    On Zack Polanski, he is impressively well presented but becomes questionable once the surface is scratched. Imo he's less questionable than the Reformista bigwigs, because he at least has principles rather than nihilism.

    On Hypnoboobs (which is a good quip) I not sure whether to look down for on him or his customers more. He was 30, and Harley Street is an epicentre of both quackery and the enablement of criminality - did not Mohammed Al Fayed have his victims pre-inspected there?

    Perhaps he should have used blue pyramids?

    I'm excited by the reference to blue pyramids, which I'm choosing to infer is a reference to the Great Pyramid of Stockport - which is where ZP went to school - but I don't fully understand it. So I expect my inference is wrong...?
    I got onto the Stockport one last time.

    This one is Sarah Ferguson in the early 1990s and a clairvoyant called Madame Vasso, where SF sat under a Blue Pyramid to be cleansed. Same sort of edgy stuff that highly intelligent or rich people swallow, to meet some sort of need.

    A strange character, who betrayed Sarah Ferguson's confidences in a book - Isobel Oakeshott style.

    My photo quota:



    Short interview:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UG0bIEX4qUI

    Obit (may not be paywalled):
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1493102/Madame-Vasso.html
  • You forgot the Green Party of Northern Ireland :lol:
  • StereodogStereodog Posts: 1,150
    Nigelb said:

    Thanks @GarethoftheVale2 - useful header summary of the Greens.

    Huddersfield is an interesting example as I think I'm in saying it represents a really good example of what Ramsey has been saying about electoral strategy: the Greens win seats in areas where they have spent years building a reputation on local government. Kirklees was one of the first councils anywhere with Greens on it I think. It's slow steady work. And involves very tightly focusing limited resources. It's a model of course the Liberals have used for years.

    Polanski has argued - it seems successfully in the leader poll - that this is all far too slow.

    It will be interesting in 2028/9 but me thinks Ramsey will be proved the better strategist.

    I think that's right. The Labour council in Kirklees are pretty poor (something that tends to happen when a party has been in control for too long), and some of the Green councillors sensible pragmatists.

    The national party is far less convincing.
    The Greens were starting to build the priceless skill of being all things to all people that the Lib Dems had prior to the coalition. They could win concerned NIMBY votes in the leafy suburbs as well as radical student types in urban seats. Polanski risks throwing this away without the consolation of having been in power for a bit
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 30,630
    algarkirk said:

    I think there is a tipping point with Reform where if enough people become aware of the crazy, it will hit support. Despite all the comparisons the UK is not quite the states yet where everything is excused dependant on one’s overall worldview (though it is skating perilously close to the edge).

    But I’d just let these things feed into general public discourse through osmosis: I wouldn’t, as a political party, go particularly hard on it. Just highlight it and leave it there for people to realise the nuttiness.

    There multiple ways in which Reform don't form/lead the next government. The 60-65% who really don't want this need to work on them.

    Being found out as nasty natured charlatans and chancers who have policies that are both contradictory and crazy, with huge silences over every really hard questions and little talent would be a start.

    The next would be for other parties (the Tories have a big choice here, and look like making the wrong one) to get a lot better at centrist politics and for government to start getting better at doing its job so that tactical voting by the 60% who don't want Reform can be credible and effective.

    The Tory choice? Is to say that they would rather be in coalition with Labour than with Reform.
    But they wouldn't, would they?
    Really? Deep down?
    And anyways. That would lead to a peeling off of half of their current support.
    Leaving them in single figures.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 87,475
    edited September 8
    Dr Foxy was wondering if the economy / job market was picking up after their children had secured employment over the past few months. It certainly didn't match what I have been told by people on both sides of the equation. And now we get some new data,

    The number of people seeking work has jumped at its fastest pace in five years as company bosses brace for Rachel Reeves to impose more tax rises at the next Budget.

    In August, the supply of jobseekers rose by the largest amount since November 2020 as businesses laid people off and nervous managers cut back on hiring.

    Recruiters blamed “weak confidence around the economic outlook and concerns over costs”, according to the survey by KPMG and the Recruitment & Employment Confederation (REC).

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/09/08/jobseeker-numbers-surge-fastest-pace-five-years/
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 130,209
    The problem for the Greens is that as they move left under Polanski they will lose ex Tory seats they won in Herefordshire and like Waveney and lose the chance of taking Isle of Wight East next time. Whereas originally the Greens were solely focused on the environment and mildly Eurosceptic, even Farage voted for them in the 1989 EU Parliament elections on that basis
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 130,209
    dixiedean said:

    algarkirk said:

    I think there is a tipping point with Reform where if enough people become aware of the crazy, it will hit support. Despite all the comparisons the UK is not quite the states yet where everything is excused dependant on one’s overall worldview (though it is skating perilously close to the edge).

    But I’d just let these things feed into general public discourse through osmosis: I wouldn’t, as a political party, go particularly hard on it. Just highlight it and leave it there for people to realise the nuttiness.

    There multiple ways in which Reform don't form/lead the next government. The 60-65% who really don't want this need to work on them.

    Being found out as nasty natured charlatans and chancers who have policies that are both contradictory and crazy, with huge silences over every really hard questions and little talent would be a start.

    The next would be for other parties (the Tories have a big choice here, and look like making the wrong one) to get a lot better at centrist politics and for government to start getting better at doing its job so that tactical voting by the 60% who don't want Reform can be credible and effective.

    The Tory choice? Is to say that they would rather be in coalition with Labour than with Reform.
    But they wouldn't, would they?
    Really? Deep down?
    And anyways. That would lead to a peeling off of half of their current support.
    Leaving them in single figures.
    Yes if the Tories said they would prop up a Labour government but not Reform most of their remaining vote would go Reform and the rest LD ultimately. Far better for them to vote bill by bill in a hung parliament
  • MattWMattW Posts: 29,761
    edited September 8
    Thanks for the header, @GarethoftheVale2 . A good piece, and this is what I would like in the next one.

    I would like to see some analysis of where the Greens have grown their Council seat base, and how well they hold areas they have won.

    It seems to be both rural (eg High Peaks in Derbyshire - 2 seats) but also Red Wall (eg Darlington - 6 seats). I've had some contact with both of those two wrt active travel, which is why I mention them. The Greens in my experience are the only party who are reliable on the principles on this - all of the others, including the Lib Dems, will trim on these and regard accessibility as part of a political negotiation to at least some extent.

    There's a threshold in 2019, when they had 179 Council seats in England, and today they have 859.

    I want to know where they have gone from effectively nothing to a decent sized group, and why.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 67,891
    Stereodog said:

    Nigelb said:

    Thanks @GarethoftheVale2 - useful header summary of the Greens.

    Huddersfield is an interesting example as I think I'm in saying it represents a really good example of what Ramsey has been saying about electoral strategy: the Greens win seats in areas where they have spent years building a reputation on local government. Kirklees was one of the first councils anywhere with Greens on it I think. It's slow steady work. And involves very tightly focusing limited resources. It's a model of course the Liberals have used for years.

    Polanski has argued - it seems successfully in the leader poll - that this is all far too slow.

    It will be interesting in 2028/9 but me thinks Ramsey will be proved the better strategist.

    I think that's right. The Labour council in Kirklees are pretty poor (something that tends to happen when a party has been in control for too long), and some of the Green councillors sensible pragmatists.

    The national party is far less convincing.
    The Greens were starting to build the priceless skill of being all things to all people that the Lib Dems had prior to the coalition. They could win concerned NIMBY votes in the leafy suburbs as well as radical student types in urban seats. Polanski risks throwing this away without the consolation of having been in power for a bit
    Yep.

    The Ramsey strategy, if we can call it that, was working and he's been toiling away on it for years. Must be pretty galling to have an ex-LibDem whose only been in the party about five minutes come along and say 'I have a better way', claiming they can win dozens of seats, and win a leadership landslide. But I guess that's democracy for you.

    Or maybe it is just entryism?

  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 30,630
    MattW said:

    Cookie said:

    MattW said:

    On Zack Polanski, he is impressively well presented but becomes questionable once the surface is scratched. Imo he's less questionable than the Reformista bigwigs, because he at least has principles rather than nihilism.

    On Hypnoboobs (which is a good quip) I not sure whether to look down for on him or his customers more. He was 30, and Harley Street is an epicentre of both quackery and the enablement of criminality - did not Mohammed Al Fayed have his victims pre-inspected there?

    Perhaps he should have used blue pyramids?

    I'm excited by the reference to blue pyramids, which I'm choosing to infer is a reference to the Great Pyramid of Stockport - which is where ZP went to school - but I don't fully understand it. So I expect my inference is wrong...?
    I got onto the Stockport one last time.

    This one is Sarah Ferguson in the early 1990s and a clairvoyant called Madame Vasso, where SF sat under a Blue Pyramid to be cleansed. Same sort of edgy stuff that highly intelligent or rich people swallow, to meet some sort of need.

    A strange character, who betrayed Sarah Ferguson's confidences in a book - Isobel Oakeshott style.

    My photo quota:



    Short interview:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UG0bIEX4qUI

    Obit (may not be paywalled):
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1493102/Madame-Vasso.html
    Looks like a shonky Primary school science experiment. One where the kids won't stay on the carpet long.
  • nico67 said:

    MattW said:

    Carnyx said:

    isam said:

    People criticise the BBC etc for giving Reform too much airtime, but here we are, twenty comments into a thread about the Green Party, and everyone’s talking about Reform. Why would the media be any different?

    Actually a study published in yesterdays independent/i paper showed Farage wasn’t on mainstream tv more than other politicians. He wasn’t even the top Reformer

    Nigel Farage is not given more airtime on TV than other politicians, an academic study has found

    https://x.com/theipaper/status/1964723531616284787?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    Paywalled. But what time does it cover? Pre-Reform or Reform? And does it weight for numbers of MP/MSP/MS/MLA or voters?
    I can read it, and I am not a subscriber.

    However analysis of party representation across flagship TV political programmes by Cardiff University’s School of Journalism, Media and Culture, found Farage appeared less frequently on flagship political shows last year, “contrary to long-standing claims that Nigel Farage is allocated more frequent appearances than other politicians on programmes such as Question Time”.

    The study is here; it's political TV not news:
    https://www.enhancingimpartiality.com/blog/interpreting-impartiality

    We conducted an analysis of guests selected across five of the UK’s most prominent political discussion programmes, including Any Questions (BBC Radio 4), Peston (ITV), Question Time (BBC), Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg (BBC) and Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips (Sky News).
    That doesn’t include news items, interviews on the news and print media so I think it’s missing a lot .
    Here is an alternative chart showing the visibility of politicians. Top is Angela Rayner, then Starmer, then Farage.

    Westminster Spotlight League Table
    Ranking every MPs media visibility across the UK's top publications over the last week with multipliers for articles specifically about the MP.
    https://www.mp.govspendbase.uk/
  • Labour deputy leadership timetable:

    I hear plans are in the works for a hustings with MPs Wednesday, before MP nominations close at 5 p.m. this Thursday (candidates will need 80 each).

    https://x.com/danbloom1/status/1964933179820974505

    Those going for this role have to get their arse in gear fast.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 130,209
    malcolmg said:

    FPT
    Stereodog said:

    » show previous quotes
    I really don't think the public care that Starmer has no outward charisma. His massive problem is that he can't inspire any loyalty or even fear amongst his cabinet and MPs. I think that Starmer's resemblance to Ted Heath grows each day he is in office but at least Heath inspired fierce loyalty among his lieutenants and fear on the back benches.

    He is like a wet blanket , no -one would want to be stuck with him. Like a grey cardboard cutout of a less able John Major.
    I reckon he models himself on Roy from Corrie , minus the shopping bag.

    Roy from Corrie is a respected character
  • TimSTimS Posts: 16,085
    HYUFD said:

    The problem for the Greens is that as they move left under Polanski they will lose ex Tory seats they won in Herefordshire and like Waveney and lose the chance of taking Isle of Wight East next time. Whereas originally the Greens were solely focused on the environment and mildly Eurosceptic, even Farage voted for them in the 1989 EU Parliament elections on that basis

    Are we making the usual mistake of assuming massive political engagement by the electorate? How many concerned rural eco voters will be aware or particularly bothered about the fact Polanski is a Trot?

    Especially with the Greens, who get very little national exposure. Remember most voters can’t even name the main party leaders let alone know what their views on Gaza are.

    (And contrary to assumptions about yokels, I expect a fair proportion of Green voters in Herefordshire or Suffolk probably do share some of Polanski’s politics, if they know what they are.)
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 30,630
    MattW said:

    Thanks for the header, @GarethoftheVale2 . A good piece, and this is what I would like in the next one.

    I would like to see some analysis of where the Greens have grown their Council seat base, and how well they hold areas they have won.

    It seems to be both rural (eg High Peaks in Derbyshire - 2 seats) but also Red Wall (eg Darlington - 6 seats). I've had some contact with both of those two wrt active travel, which is why I mention them. The Greens in my experience are the only party who are reliable on the principles on this - all of the others, including the Lib Dems, will trim on these and regard accessibility as part of a political negotiation to at least some extent.

    There's a threshold in 2019, when they had 179 Council seats in England, and today they have 859.

    I want to know where they have gone from effectively nothing to a decent sized group, and why.

    I'd like to see some analysis of why and how they won Waveney and North Herefordshire.
    Abject Tory government is obviously a large part of it. But why there and not elsewhere?
    It seems all too easy to simply say that they'll lose them if they go left. When we don't have a got handle on why they won them in the first place.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 30,630
    HYUFD said:

    malcolmg said:

    FPT
    Stereodog said:

    » show previous quotes
    I really don't think the public care that Starmer has no outward charisma. His massive problem is that he can't inspire any loyalty or even fear amongst his cabinet and MPs. I think that Starmer's resemblance to Ted Heath grows each day he is in office but at least Heath inspired fierce loyalty among his lieutenants and fear on the back benches.

    He is like a wet blanket , no -one would want to be stuck with him. Like a grey cardboard cutout of a less able John Major.
    I reckon he models himself on Roy from Corrie , minus the shopping bag.

    Roy from Corrie is a respected character
    Very woke on trans matters too.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 16,085
    edited September 8
    dixiedean said:

    MattW said:

    Thanks for the header, @GarethoftheVale2 . A good piece, and this is what I would like in the next one.

    I would like to see some analysis of where the Greens have grown their Council seat base, and how well they hold areas they have won.

    It seems to be both rural (eg High Peaks in Derbyshire - 2 seats) but also Red Wall (eg Darlington - 6 seats). I've had some contact with both of those two wrt active travel, which is why I mention them. The Greens in my experience are the only party who are reliable on the principles on this - all of the others, including the Lib Dems, will trim on these and regard accessibility as part of a political negotiation to at least some extent.

    There's a threshold in 2019, when they had 179 Council seats in England, and today they have 859.

    I want to know where they have gone from effectively nothing to a decent sized group, and why.

    I'd like to see some analysis of why and how they won Waveney and North Herefordshire.
    Abject Tory government is obviously a large part of it. But why there and not elsewhere?
    It seems all too easy to simply say that they'll lose them if they go left. When we don't have a got handle on why they won them in the first place.
    North Herefordshire was very much about a single issue: the death of the middle sections of the Wye due to phosphate pollution from massive chicken farms.

    What used to be a sparkling, salmon filled watercourse that was a pleasure to swim in has turned into a turbid brown pond with regular algal blooms and no salmon.

    Years have passed, politicians have said they’d do something about it but didn’t.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 14,028
    HYUFD said:

    The problem for the Greens is that as they move left under Polanski they will lose ex Tory seats they won in Herefordshire and like Waveney and lose the chance of taking Isle of Wight East next time. Whereas originally the Greens were solely focused on the environment and mildly Eurosceptic, even Farage voted for them in the 1989 EU Parliament elections on that basis

    Morning all.
    On this, I have my doubts Ramsay will be able to stomach staying in a harder left Green party and it will be interesting to see if and how long he stays after his return from compassionate leave.
    Id not be entirely surprised regardless of his movements to see a Green mk 2/Ecology Party emerge to try and sweep up that rural ex Tory, environmental vote.
    Of course they'd be tiny like the original Ecology Party but there is obviously a space for that in politics.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 15,448
    dixiedean said:

    algarkirk said:

    I think there is a tipping point with Reform where if enough people become aware of the crazy, it will hit support. Despite all the comparisons the UK is not quite the states yet where everything is excused dependant on one’s overall worldview (though it is skating perilously close to the edge).

    But I’d just let these things feed into general public discourse through osmosis: I wouldn’t, as a political party, go particularly hard on it. Just highlight it and leave it there for people to realise the nuttiness.

    There multiple ways in which Reform don't form/lead the next government. The 60-65% who really don't want this need to work on them.

    Being found out as nasty natured charlatans and chancers who have policies that are both contradictory and crazy, with huge silences over every really hard questions and little talent would be a start.

    The next would be for other parties (the Tories have a big choice here, and look like making the wrong one) to get a lot better at centrist politics and for government to start getting better at doing its job so that tactical voting by the 60% who don't want Reform can be credible and effective.

    The Tory choice? Is to say that they would rather be in coalition with Labour than with Reform.
    But they wouldn't, would they?
    Really? Deep down?
    And anyways. That would lead to a peeling off of half of their current support.
    Leaving them in single figures.
    That all depends on what sort of Tory party they want to be. Of course they would lose support of they went 'we are not Reform, we are One Nation Tories, we are not unpleasant English nationalists'. But that's because they have already lost their centrist One Nation heartland voters. Look at 2024, look at the polls.

    No-one wants to vote Tory at the moment because they are useless, unprincipled, incoherent and Reformlite.

    The way back is not populism, Farage will always beat them there, but articulating in principle and policy what Toryism stands for and how it works, here and now.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 8,022
    algarkirk said:

    I think there is a tipping point with Reform where if enough people become aware of the crazy, it will hit support. Despite all the comparisons the UK is not quite the states yet where everything is excused dependant on one’s overall worldview (though it is skating perilously close to the edge).

    But I’d just let these things feed into general public discourse through osmosis: I wouldn’t, as a political party, go particularly hard on it. Just highlight it and leave it there for people to realise the nuttiness.

    There multiple ways in which Reform don't form/lead the next government. The 60-65% who really don't want this need to work on them.

    Being found out as nasty natured charlatans and chancers who have policies that are both contradictory and crazy, with huge silences over every really hard questions and little talent would be a start.

    The next would be for other parties (the Tories have a big choice here, and look like making the wrong one) to get a lot better at centrist politics and for government to start getting better at doing its job so that tactical voting by the 60% who don't want Reform can be credible and effective.

    The Tory choice? Is to say that they would rather be in coalition with Labour than with Reform.
    In all honesty, the Tories aren’t much in charge of their own destiny right now. They’ll either recover or decline based on the relative performance of Reform, in all likelihood, and there’s not a tremendous amount they can do up until that point other than reminding people they exist and trying to talk some vague sense.

    Labour are the ones with their hands on the machinery of government. They are the ones who can deliver results. But a note on “centrism” per your post - if we are taking centrism to mean the broad consensus politics that we’ve been used to in recent years, that isn’t going to deliver the results - so there needs to be a type of “radical centrism” for want of a much better term; that acknowledges that departure from the precedent is the only way we are going to get society working for people. Some politicians are slowly starting to get this, but I doubt they have the political will to really try and do anything about it. We shall see.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 16,085
    dixiedean said:

    MattW said:

    Thanks for the header, @GarethoftheVale2 . A good piece, and this is what I would like in the next one.

    I would like to see some analysis of where the Greens have grown their Council seat base, and how well they hold areas they have won.

    It seems to be both rural (eg High Peaks in Derbyshire - 2 seats) but also Red Wall (eg Darlington - 6 seats). I've had some contact with both of those two wrt active travel, which is why I mention them. The Greens in my experience are the only party who are reliable on the principles on this - all of the others, including the Lib Dems, will trim on these and regard accessibility as part of a political negotiation to at least some extent.

    There's a threshold in 2019, when they had 179 Council seats in England, and today they have 859.

    I want to know where they have gone from effectively nothing to a decent sized group, and why.

    I'd like to see some analysis of why and how they won Waveney and North Herefordshire.
    Abject Tory government is obviously a large part of it. But why there and not elsewhere?
    It seems all too easy to simply say that they'll lose them if they go left. When we don't have a got handle on why they won them in the first place.
    Waveney is part of a fascinating tract of political terroir. Starting in North London it’s possible to drive for a couple of hours in a roughly straight line and take in seats won by independents (Corbyn), Labour, Conservative, Green (Waveney), Reform (Great Yarmouth) and ending in North Norfolk with the Lib Dems. No Plaid or SNP in East Anglia but give them time.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 29,761

    Labour deputy leadership timetable:

    I hear plans are in the works for a hustings with MPs Wednesday, before MP nominations close at 5 p.m. this Thursday (candidates will need 80 each).

    https://x.com/danbloom1/status/1964933179820974505

    Those going for this role have to get their arse in gear fast.

    Picking this up, the thread from last week, and Ash Sarkar's very interesting interview with the Daily T, housing in London is a huge problem bubbling under.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KbsdWilgPU

    We talked about it on a national basis, but building stopping in London can hole Labour below the waterline.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 27,210
    dixiedean said:

    algarkirk said:

    I think there is a tipping point with Reform where if enough people become aware of the crazy, it will hit support. Despite all the comparisons the UK is not quite the states yet where everything is excused dependant on one’s overall worldview (though it is skating perilously close to the edge).

    But I’d just let these things feed into general public discourse through osmosis: I wouldn’t, as a political party, go particularly hard on it. Just highlight it and leave it there for people to realise the nuttiness.

    There multiple ways in which Reform don't form/lead the next government. The 60-65% who really don't want this need to work on them.

    Being found out as nasty natured charlatans and chancers who have policies that are both contradictory and crazy, with huge silences over every really hard questions and little talent would be a start.

    The next would be for other parties (the Tories have a big choice here, and look like making the wrong one) to get a lot better at centrist politics and for government to start getting better at doing its job so that tactical voting by the 60% who don't want Reform can be credible and effective.

    The Tory choice? Is to say that they would rather be in coalition with Labour than with Reform.
    But they wouldn't, would they?
    Really? Deep down?
    And anyways. That would lead to a peeling off of half of their current support.
    Leaving them in single figures.
    You reckon Labour would say they'd go in with the Tories to keep Reform out?
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 30,630
    tlg86 said:

    dixiedean said:

    algarkirk said:

    I think there is a tipping point with Reform where if enough people become aware of the crazy, it will hit support. Despite all the comparisons the UK is not quite the states yet where everything is excused dependant on one’s overall worldview (though it is skating perilously close to the edge).

    But I’d just let these things feed into general public discourse through osmosis: I wouldn’t, as a political party, go particularly hard on it. Just highlight it and leave it there for people to realise the nuttiness.

    There multiple ways in which Reform don't form/lead the next government. The 60-65% who really don't want this need to work on them.

    Being found out as nasty natured charlatans and chancers who have policies that are both contradictory and crazy, with huge silences over every really hard questions and little talent would be a start.

    The next would be for other parties (the Tories have a big choice here, and look like making the wrong one) to get a lot better at centrist politics and for government to start getting better at doing its job so that tactical voting by the 60% who don't want Reform can be credible and effective.

    The Tory choice? Is to say that they would rather be in coalition with Labour than with Reform.
    But they wouldn't, would they?
    Really? Deep down?
    And anyways. That would lead to a peeling off of half of their current support.
    Leaving them in single figures.
    You reckon Labour would say they'd go in with the Tories to keep Reform out?
    That's a different question entirely.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 29,761

    nico67 said:

    MattW said:

    Carnyx said:

    isam said:

    People criticise the BBC etc for giving Reform too much airtime, but here we are, twenty comments into a thread about the Green Party, and everyone’s talking about Reform. Why would the media be any different?

    Actually a study published in yesterdays independent/i paper showed Farage wasn’t on mainstream tv more than other politicians. He wasn’t even the top Reformer

    Nigel Farage is not given more airtime on TV than other politicians, an academic study has found

    https://x.com/theipaper/status/1964723531616284787?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q

    Paywalled. But what time does it cover? Pre-Reform or Reform? And does it weight for numbers of MP/MSP/MS/MLA or voters?
    I can read it, and I am not a subscriber.

    However analysis of party representation across flagship TV political programmes by Cardiff University’s School of Journalism, Media and Culture, found Farage appeared less frequently on flagship political shows last year, “contrary to long-standing claims that Nigel Farage is allocated more frequent appearances than other politicians on programmes such as Question Time”.

    The study is here; it's political TV not news:
    https://www.enhancingimpartiality.com/blog/interpreting-impartiality

    We conducted an analysis of guests selected across five of the UK’s most prominent political discussion programmes, including Any Questions (BBC Radio 4), Peston (ITV), Question Time (BBC), Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg (BBC) and Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips (Sky News).
    That doesn’t include news items, interviews on the news and print media so I think it’s missing a lot .
    Here is an alternative chart showing the visibility of politicians. Top is Angela Rayner, then Starmer, then Farage.

    Westminster Spotlight League Table
    Ranking every MPs media visibility across the UK's top publications over the last week with multipliers for articles specifically about the MP.
    https://www.mp.govspendbase.uk/
    What is the basis of that survey? Their top 10 "most positive" for "Media Sentiment" are below. What does it mean? The common feature to me is "out on the edge".

    Nigel Farage - Ref UK
    Jeremy Corbyn - Ind
    Zarah Sultana - Ind
    Ellie Reeves - Lab
    Ellie Chowns - Grn
    James Murray - Lab
    Carla Denyer - Grn
    Adrian Ramsey - Grn
    Alex Norris - Lab
    Sarah Jones - Lab
  • stodgestodge Posts: 15,283
    Morning all :)

    Mrs Stodge (of the Kiwi persuasion) has been following the Tom Phillips story for some time. As she told me, it's probably how many thought it would end though there were fears the children wouldn't survive.

    That part of the western Waikato is well off the tourist trail and the beaten track - it's not far from the back of beyond. Phillips had friends and supporters in the local community, at least initially, and was able to use them to evade the authorities but with time he became mosre brazen and desperate and in the end a confrontation with the Police was inevitable but as Mrs Stodge has told me, it's a complex and sad tale of family break down.

    In East London, the normal occasional passage of underground trains, visible and occasionally audible (if the wind is in the right direction) from Stodge Towers is both invisible and inevitably muted this morning. The RMT dispute has had the effect desired or expected with almost no underground service in the capital. With home working now a largely accepted (except on parts of PB it seems) part of working life, the effects are not what they would have been though I suspect tomorrow will be more difficult with the DLR taken out by a separate dispute.

    On topic, the Greens are a political force in my part of East London though the coming of the pro-Palestine Newham Independents has reduced their influence especailly in the more Muslim areas. Two councillors on Newham are entrenched in Stratford & New Town and the third (gained by defection from Labour) is in a Ward where the Greens have done well in the past.

    Nonetheless, in a crowded anti-Labour field, it will be interesting to see if any kind of electoral pact (informal or otherwise) is in place next year so for example the Newham Independents will only stand in the Muslim Wards, the Greens in others and perhaps candidates from the Corbyn/Sultana grouping will fill the gaps. Labour will prevail and easily if the forces against them are fragmented but a single slate of anti-Labour candidates from the "left" could do very well as could a single Mayoral candidate.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 27,210
    dixiedean said:

    tlg86 said:

    dixiedean said:

    algarkirk said:

    I think there is a tipping point with Reform where if enough people become aware of the crazy, it will hit support. Despite all the comparisons the UK is not quite the states yet where everything is excused dependant on one’s overall worldview (though it is skating perilously close to the edge).

    But I’d just let these things feed into general public discourse through osmosis: I wouldn’t, as a political party, go particularly hard on it. Just highlight it and leave it there for people to realise the nuttiness.

    There multiple ways in which Reform don't form/lead the next government. The 60-65% who really don't want this need to work on them.

    Being found out as nasty natured charlatans and chancers who have policies that are both contradictory and crazy, with huge silences over every really hard questions and little talent would be a start.

    The next would be for other parties (the Tories have a big choice here, and look like making the wrong one) to get a lot better at centrist politics and for government to start getting better at doing its job so that tactical voting by the 60% who don't want Reform can be credible and effective.

    The Tory choice? Is to say that they would rather be in coalition with Labour than with Reform.
    But they wouldn't, would they?
    Really? Deep down?
    And anyways. That would lead to a peeling off of half of their current support.
    Leaving them in single figures.
    You reckon Labour would say they'd go in with the Tories to keep Reform out?
    That's a different question entirely.
    Is it? It's a bit weird to use grand coalition as a stick with which to beat the Tories but not do the same to Labour or anyone else for that matter.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 8,022
    The looming political crisis in France will surely have some lessons for politicians on this side of the channel too. The French economy suffers from much of the same structural weaknesses as ours, save that they are a few years ahead of us. How they navigate this will be instructive. The only way forwards appears to be painful restructuring, but the Parliament won’t accept it, and politicians are still trying to persuade people that cakeism is an option. There’s also the risk (because, France) of this all descending into a general strike and street protest.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,773
    Stereodog said:

    Nigelb said:

    Thanks @GarethoftheVale2 - useful header summary of the Greens.

    Huddersfield is an interesting example as I think I'm in saying it represents a really good example of what Ramsey has been saying about electoral strategy: the Greens win seats in areas where they have spent years building a reputation on local government. Kirklees was one of the first councils anywhere with Greens on it I think. It's slow steady work. And involves very tightly focusing limited resources. It's a model of course the Liberals have used for years.

    Polanski has argued - it seems successfully in the leader poll - that this is all far too slow.

    It will be interesting in 2028/9 but me thinks Ramsey will be proved the better strategist.

    I think that's right. The Labour council in Kirklees are pretty poor (something that tends to happen when a party has been in control for too long), and some of the Green councillors sensible pragmatists.

    The national party is far less convincing.
    The Greens were starting to build the priceless skill of being all things to all people that the Lib Dems had prior to the coalition. They could win concerned NIMBY votes in the leafy suburbs as well as radical student types in urban seats. Polanski risks throwing this away without the consolation of having been in power for a bit
    Firstly, I don't think the impression of single party control is quite right, Kirklees is not a Tameside, Oldham, Wakefield one party state scenario - checking on Wikipedia it has had majority control, Labour, for just 4 years this century, the rest of the time being NOC. It's right that recent years have been Labour led in the main but there was a good many years of LD minority administrations up to the coalition and, iirc, I think even the Cons may have had a go briefly at minority control in the late 10s. That said Labour has had all the trouble of Corbynism, Gaza losses and the like whittle at it over the years.

    The Green contingent on Kirklees has for many years amounted to 3 councillors in one ward, my ward of Newsome, they haven't lost here since, I think, 1996 and typical now poll in the 55-70% range in the ward. They often just call out from the sidelines, but they are excellent locally and their votes have counted in some of those NOC situations. I've voted for them locally since Corbyn.

    In 2024 they expanded out in a second ward (Crossland...) and narrowly missed out on a third (Greenhead) due to a Gaza candidate splitting the vote. At the GE they got the Gaza vote here in the full absence of a dedicated Independent, and had an excellent campaign with the 25+ year time served councillor who is the core of their ward success as the parliamentary candidate. They will be hopeful of getting into double figures in councillors in next year's all ups.

    The challenges for them are the national ones though - Reform are competitive in the constituency and that could lead to "stick to nurse" tactical voting, the Future Left (pre-YP) held a one day conference with Corbyn in Huddersfield, which was definitely a tanks on the lawn type move, Cllr Cooper is not a young man and could a generic Green campaign as well as him, could their council bloc get mired in what is almost certainly going to be a massively split and messy election result next year, awareness of Green competitiveness is not that widespread or assumed and the national party may favour Bristol where word is out - needs a broad Winning Here across all wards.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 56,855
    Stereodog said:

    Nigelb said:

    Thanks @GarethoftheVale2 - useful header summary of the Greens.

    Huddersfield is an interesting example as I think I'm in saying it represents a really good example of what Ramsey has been saying about electoral strategy: the Greens win seats in areas where they have spent years building a reputation on local government. Kirklees was one of the first councils anywhere with Greens on it I think. It's slow steady work. And involves very tightly focusing limited resources. It's a model of course the Liberals have used for years.

    Polanski has argued - it seems successfully in the leader poll - that this is all far too slow.

    It will be interesting in 2028/9 but me thinks Ramsey will be proved the better strategist.

    I think that's right. The Labour council in Kirklees are pretty poor (something that tends to happen when a party has been in control for too long), and some of the Green councillors sensible pragmatists.

    The national party is far less convincing.
    The Greens were starting to build the priceless skill of being all things to all people that the Lib Dems had prior to the coalition. They could win concerned NIMBY votes in the leafy suburbs as well as radical student types in urban seats. Polanski risks throwing this away without the consolation of having been in power for a bit
    I recall a previous Green "boom" - I think it was under Brown. Did quite well in some council elections. It collapsed when their new voters found out about the Red policies
  • MattWMattW Posts: 29,761
    MattW said:

    Labour deputy leadership timetable:

    I hear plans are in the works for a hustings with MPs Wednesday, before MP nominations close at 5 p.m. this Thursday (candidates will need 80 each).

    https://x.com/danbloom1/status/1964933179820974505

    Those going for this role have to get their arse in gear fast.

    Picking this up, the thread from last week, and Ash Sarkar's very interesting interview with the Daily T, housing in London is a huge problem bubbling under.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KbsdWilgPU

    We talked about it on a national basis, but building stopping in London can hole Labour below the waterline.
    Let me double down that recommendation. Ash Sarkar has just got married, and the exchange with Tim Stanley is fascinating.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 15,448

    algarkirk said:

    I think there is a tipping point with Reform where if enough people become aware of the crazy, it will hit support. Despite all the comparisons the UK is not quite the states yet where everything is excused dependant on one’s overall worldview (though it is skating perilously close to the edge).

    But I’d just let these things feed into general public discourse through osmosis: I wouldn’t, as a political party, go particularly hard on it. Just highlight it and leave it there for people to realise the nuttiness.

    There multiple ways in which Reform don't form/lead the next government. The 60-65% who really don't want this need to work on them.

    Being found out as nasty natured charlatans and chancers who have policies that are both contradictory and crazy, with huge silences over every really hard questions and little talent would be a start.

    The next would be for other parties (the Tories have a big choice here, and look like making the wrong one) to get a lot better at centrist politics and for government to start getting better at doing its job so that tactical voting by the 60% who don't want Reform can be credible and effective.

    The Tory choice? Is to say that they would rather be in coalition with Labour than with Reform.
    In all honesty, the Tories aren’t much in charge of their own destiny right now. They’ll either recover or decline based on the relative performance of Reform, in all likelihood, and there’s not a tremendous amount they can do up until that point other than reminding people they exist and trying to talk some vague sense.

    Labour are the ones with their hands on the machinery of government. They are the ones who can deliver results. But a note on “centrism” per your post - if we are taking centrism to mean the broad consensus politics that we’ve been used to in recent years, that isn’t going to deliver the results - so there needs to be a type of “radical centrism” for want of a much better term; that acknowledges that departure from the precedent is the only way we are going to get society working for people. Some politicians are slowly starting to get this, but I doubt they have the political will to really try and do anything about it. We shall see.
    Thanks. Yes. Centrism comes in flavours and is more than consensus but has a common core. Trump, Corbyn, Farage (probably), Putin, Xi, Polanski, Galloway are not centrists. Centrism, as I see it, is serious about avoiding populism (simple answers to complex questions), accepting the democratic process, avoiding authoritarianism, upholding the rule of law and separation of powers, working with an international order, accepts the world is complicated and imperfect, upholds private enterprise and a substantial welfare state, doesn't demonise minorities, prefers Adam Smith and David Ricardo to Marx, is fiscally responsible.

    Within those constraints any amount of radicalism is possible. As Attlee, Thatcher and Blair illustrate.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 16,137
    I remember Jonathan Bartley. He's a friend of a friend! He's also in a rock band. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ma38YnS4cI

    I remember Siân Berry, because we've met several times and she never remembers who I am!
Sign In or Register to comment.