Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Why May’s Euro elections could be more challenging for UKIP

SystemSystem Posts: 12,214
edited March 2014 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Why May’s Euro elections could be more challenging for UKIP than 2004 or 2009

Expect to see more attacks on UKIP like this in the 11 weeks remaining
pic.twitter.com/4AyroUsc1S

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • unspoofable

    Ed Miliband‏@Ed_Miliband·2 hrs
    I welcome the support David Owen is giving Labour. We are reaching out to become a truly One Nation party.
  • compouter2compouter2 Posts: 2,371
    edited March 2014
    Anymore from Team Boris today?

    I hope we see more of this between now and the election

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hRwnXmdRCo
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    unspoofable

    Ed Miliband‏@Ed_Miliband·2 hrs
    I welcome the support David Owen is giving Labour. We are reaching out to become a truly One Nation party.

    ?? Don't get your point.

    The Owen support for Labour is a big development which makes the ill-thought out Red Ed rhetoric even less potent.

  • compouter2compouter2 Posts: 2,371
    edited March 2014

    unspoofable

    Ed Miliband‏@Ed_Miliband·2 hrs
    I welcome the support David Owen is giving Labour. We are reaching out to become a truly One Nation party.

    ?? Don't get your point.

    The Owen support for Labour is a big development which makes the ill-thought out Red Ed rhetoric even less potent.

    Mike, I think you pointing that out will get through to certain posters on here just as quick as what you have been pointing out to them about the Lib Dem to Labour switchers.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    edited March 2014

    unspoofable

    Ed Miliband‏@Ed_Miliband·2 hrs
    I welcome the support David Owen is giving Labour. We are reaching out to become a truly One Nation party.

    ?? Don't get your point.

    The Owen support for Labour is a big development which makes the ill-thought out Red Ed rhetoric even less potent.

    Labour reaching out to an ex-Labour MP. Owen's return is symbolic of your 2010 LibDems going 'home' to Labour. To me it's confirming the 35% strategy.

    It's a definite positive for Ed but it's hardly one nation, it's trying to get the left-leaning LibDems or Social Democrats back and safely ignore the Orange booker side and everyone else.
  • Just to set the record straight Trevor Coleman is still a UKIP MEP, although he is not attached to the EFD group.
  • QuincelQuincel Posts: 4,042

    unspoofable

    Ed Miliband‏@Ed_Miliband·2 hrs
    I welcome the support David Owen is giving Labour. We are reaching out to become a truly One Nation party.

    ?? Don't get your point.

    The Owen support for Labour is a big development which makes the ill-thought out Red Ed rhetoric even less potent.

    Labour reaching out to an ex-Labour MP. Owen's return is symbolic of your 2010 LibDems going 'home' to Labour. To me it's confirming the 35% strategy.

    It's a definite positive for Ed but it's hardly one nation, it's trying to get the left-leaning LibDems or Social Democrats back and safely ignore the Orange booker side and everyone else.
    So you think a politician claiming a big victory about something which is a small victory is 'unspoofably' ridiculous? It's politics, this sort of thing happens the whole time, and frankly this is far from the worst example.
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    Russian propaganda, no doubt, but is this the shape of the Ukrainian split that Moscow desires?

    Protesters raised Russian flags over govt buildings in various #Ukraine's cities http://t.co/zVoeVLFtLL pic.twitter.com/v087oYMtvu

    — RT (@RT_com) March 2, 2014
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    Christ, I wish Ed would stop with this painfully lame "One Nation Labour" strapline.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited March 2014
    Is 7500 a lot in three days?

    ukipwebmaster ‏@ukipwebmaster 15m

    @Nigel_Farage 's conference speech gets over 7,500 views in a couple of days. Other political leaders are envious: http://youtu.be/e0aYvwzhELw
    View media
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    edited March 2014
    Quincel said:

    unspoofable

    Ed Miliband‏@Ed_Miliband·2 hrs
    I welcome the support David Owen is giving Labour. We are reaching out to become a truly One Nation party.

    ?? Don't get your point.

    The Owen support for Labour is a big development which makes the ill-thought out Red Ed rhetoric even less potent.

    Labour reaching out to an ex-Labour MP. Owen's return is symbolic of your 2010 LibDems going 'home' to Labour. To me it's confirming the 35% strategy.

    It's a definite positive for Ed but it's hardly one nation, it's trying to get the left-leaning LibDems or Social Democrats back and safely ignore the Orange booker side and everyone else.
    So you think a politician claiming a big victory about something which is a small victory is 'unspoofably' ridiculous? It's politics, this sort of thing happens the whole time, and frankly this is far from the worst example.
    I fail to see how one nation = an ex Labour MP going back to the fold. It's just slightly over-reaching....nay hyperbole.
  • GrandioseGrandiose Posts: 2,323
    isam said:

    Is 7500 a lot in three days?

    ukipwebmaster ‏@ukipwebmaster 15m

    @Nigel_Farage 's conference speech gets over 7,500 views in a couple of days. Other political leaders are envious: http://youtu.be/e0aYvwzhELw
    View media

    In any other walk of life, definitely not. Politicians' speeches to their party? Don't know. Doubt it.
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    edited March 2014
    AJAM Live ‏@ajamlive 1h

    British Foreign Secretary Hague says sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine has been violated-@Reuters

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbOwfeoDX2o
    Steve Clark ‏@steveclarkuk 17h

    Dear world, please don't let Middle East "peace" envoy TONY BLAIR anywhere near #Ukraine...

    All it needs is for the NeoCon chickenhawks to start foaming at the mouth for war again.
    Just like they did over Syria.
  • If Scotland does go independent are we 3/4 a nation?
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Here is someone who defected from the Tories to UKIp... and she was fantastic on Fridays Daily Politics

    Nigel Farage ‏@Nigel_Farage 2h

    Watch our new communities spokesman @SuzanneEvans1 on the @daily_politics from Friday: http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03wvfwb/Daily_Politics_28_02_2014/ … (15 minutes in
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    Mike, the UKIP Spring Conference was a big success. No amount of you saying that UKIP are failing will bring any succour to your L/Dems. Yes UKIP will have to bear greater scrutiny by the media and even greater lies and misinformation. So what! Don't make a difference: the wave is with UKIP.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,147
    isam said:

    Is 7500 a lot in three days?

    ukipwebmaster ‏@ukipwebmaster 15m

    @Nigel_Farage 's conference speech gets over 7,500 views in a couple of days. Other political leaders are envious:
    View media

    Not sure if Sheridan still counts as a pol, but 84k views in 4 weeks.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6GsEKrCvgw
  • SMukeshSMukesh Posts: 1,759

    unspoofable

    Ed Miliband‏@Ed_Miliband·2 hrs
    I welcome the support David Owen is giving Labour. We are reaching out to become a truly One Nation party.

    ?? Don't get your point.

    The Owen support for Labour is a big development which makes the ill-thought out Red Ed rhetoric even less potent.

    David Owen`s return is significant but this `One Nation` rhetoric is clearly not catching on.Maybe Ed should call his party `Social Democratic Labour` to denote the SDP return to the party.
  • MonikerDiCanioMonikerDiCanio Posts: 5,792
    edited March 2014

    unspoofable

    Ed Miliband‏@Ed_Miliband·2 hrs
    I welcome the support David Owen is giving Labour. We are reaching out to become a truly One Nation party.

    ?? Don't get your point.

    The Owen support for Labour is a big development which makes the ill-thought out Red Ed rhetoric even less potent.

    I thought Lord Owen was your bête noire. I remember you quoting this story approvingly;

    "Lord Healey reportedly calls him 'Lord Owen of Split' and has previously likened him to the 'upas tree, in whose shade nothing grows'. Though great hopes are now invested in him, he has been possibly the most hated man in the recent history of the House of Commons. 'The good fairy gave the young doctor almost everything: thick dark locks, matinee idol features, a lightning intellect,' Denis Healey once said. 'Unfortunately, the bad fairy also made him a shit.'".

    Birds of a feather flock together.
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    edited March 2014
    MikeK said:

    Mike, the UKIP Spring Conference was a big success. No amount of you saying that UKIP are failing will bring any succour to your L/Dems. Yes UKIP will have to bear greater scrutiny by the media and even greater lies and misinformation. So what! Don't make a difference: the wave is with UKIP.

    Farage is still handling the media badly because he was given yet another in a long line of absolute gifts from the incompetent fop with yet another of Cameron's Cast Iron Pledges blowing up in his face. It was even over the kipper core issue of immigration.

    Channel 4 News ‏@Channel4News

    Government's migration pledge "in tatters", as figures reveal net immigration of 200,000 - @C4Ciaran reports http://bit.ly/1cbHBty #c4news


    He's just been handed yet more ammunition as it's not just Boris calling Osbrowne a Liar but now Liam Fox is wading in and mocking the inept chumocracy.


    Anne M ‏@meganne121 2h

    Liam Fox says Cameron is underestimating UKIP and that his immigration pledge is 'statistical nonsense' - http://www.channel4.com/news/liam-fox-immigration-david-cameron-ukip-farage-election … #UKIP
  • TomTom Posts: 273
    The Sheridan video has so many hits because they thought it was of him at Cupids.
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    George Aylett ‏@georgeayl 23h

    OMOV debate over. Now Labour need to focus on winning G-election. Socialists and Blairites need to unite to defeat the greater evil: Tories.

    LOL

    Not a hope in hell.
    For some reason the Blairites are being laughed at very hard indeed these days. :)
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,682
    edited March 2014
    Fubarroso said:

    Just to set the record straight Trevor Coleman is still a UKIP MEP, although he is not attached to the EFD group.

    And of course in this Parliament they have also gained Roger Helmer from the Tories.

    Personally I think that given the voting system used to elect MEPs, any defection by an MEP should result in that seat being given to the party's next candidate. So (for all I like him) Helmer should no longer be an MEP and neither should Bannerman or any other MEP who has defected from the party that they were elected for.

  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    edited March 2014
    Mick_Pork said:

    MikeK said:

    Mike, the UKIP Spring Conference was a big success. No amount of you saying that UKIP are failing will bring any succour to your L/Dems. Yes UKIP will have to bear greater scrutiny by the media and even greater lies and misinformation. So what! Don't make a difference: the wave is with UKIP.

    Farage is still handling the media badly because he was given yet another in a long line of absolute gifts from the incompetent fop with yet another of Cameron's Cast Iron Pledges blowing up in his face. It was even over the kipper core issue of immigration.

    Channel 4 News ‏@Channel4News

    Government's migration pledge "in tatters", as figures reveal net immigration of 200,000 - @C4Ciaran reports http://bit.ly/1cbHBty #c4news


    He's just been handed yet more ammunition as it's not just Boris calling Osbrowne a Liar but now Liam Fox is wading in and mocking the inept chumocracy.


    Anne M ‏@meganne121 2h

    Liam Fox says Cameron is underestimating UKIP and that his immigration pledge is 'statistical nonsense' - http://www.channel4.com/news/liam-fox-immigration-david-cameron-ukip-farage-election … #UKIP
    I've been saying for some time that Farage is taking too much on himself this last year, and he does at times look a bit tired and tends to get edgy with off line questioning by the media. Be that as it may, he has managed - in the past few months - with the help of one or two others, in building up a team to take some of the burden from off his shoulders.

    He was in sparkling form on Marr this morning.
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    edited March 2014
    MikeK said:

    Mick_Pork said:

    MikeK said:

    Mike, the UKIP Spring Conference was a big success. No amount of you saying that UKIP are failing will bring any succour to your L/Dems. Yes UKIP will have to bear greater scrutiny by the media and even greater lies and misinformation. So what! Don't make a difference: the wave is with UKIP.

    Farage is still handling the media badly because he was given yet another in a long line of absolute gifts from the incompetent fop with yet another of Cameron's Cast Iron Pledges blowing up in his face. It was even over the kipper core issue of immigration.

    Channel 4 News ‏@Channel4News

    Government's migration pledge "in tatters", as figures reveal net immigration of 200,000 - @C4Ciaran reports http://bit.ly/1cbHBty #c4news


    He's just been handed yet more ammunition as it's not just Boris calling Osbrowne a Liar but now Liam Fox is wading in and mocking the inept chumocracy.


    Anne M ‏@meganne121 2h

    Liam Fox says Cameron is underestimating UKIP and that his immigration pledge is 'statistical nonsense' - http://www.channel4.com/news/liam-fox-immigration-david-cameron-ukip-farage-election … #UKIP
    I've been saying for some time that Farage is taking too much on himself this last year, and he does at times look a bit tired and tends to get edgy with off line questioning by the media. Be that as it may, he has managed - in the past few months - with the help of one or two others, in building up a team to take some of the burden from off his shoulders.

    He was in sparkling form on Marr this morning.
    He'll need to be from now on because there's not all that many weeks to go till the May EU elections and the kipper VI still isn't showing the solid upswing it did for last May's local elections. It's going to go up but the sooner it does and the greater that upswing, the less Farage will have to worry about liabilities like the Hamiltons, and the more the media will have to pay attention. That was the pattern for last May after all.

    If Cammie's Cast Iron Immigration Pledge in tatters doesn't help Farage (and it absolutely should have) then he's going to have to rely on calamity Clegg's debate publicity.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,054
    I think the Tories would do well to attack UKIP's record in the EU. Vote UKIP for more EU interference in Britain. Less representation means more stupid EU laws.
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    Terra de Vents ‏@koshka71 4h

    NEWSNIGHT: Neo-Nazi threat in new #Ukraine speaking loud&clear about Russian and Jews http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SBo0akeDMY
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    isam said:

    Is 7500 a lot in three days?

    ukipwebmaster ‏@ukipwebmaster 15m

    @Nigel_Farage 's conference speech gets over 7,500 views in a couple of days. Other political leaders are envious:
    View media

    Not sure if Sheridan still counts as a pol, but 84k views in 4 weeks.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6GsEKrCvgw
    Fair measuring stick I would have thought

    I made a mistake is 7500 views in 2 days
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    With grim news from the Ukraine, a fun Downfall parody that ties together the Costa Living Crisis and Harman's humble PIE:

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=72B6r6l5Igs
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    MaxPB said:

    I think the Tories would do well to attack UKIP's record in the EU. Vote UKIP for more EU interference in Britain. Less representation means more stupid EU laws.

    The Conservatives intend to pass power over justice and home affairs to the EU after the Euro elections. They want more EU laws, not fewer.

    "...the date being pencilled in for a Commons vote is at the very end of the session on the eve of the Commons rising for the summer recess on July 22. "

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/benedictbrogan/100260182/the-next-tory-plot-to-embarrass-david-cameron-on-europe-is-already-taking-shape/
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited March 2014
    What is it abour our foreign policy ? And, the US ?

    We appear to be on the same side as Al-Qaeda in Syria. Now, in Ukraine, we again appear to be on the same side as the SS types.

    I would like to make it clear, in neither case, are we their allies but, accidentally or otherwise, we appear to be on the same side.

    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    What is Putin supposed to do ? Let Ukraine be taken over by the SS mob. They even control the Defence ministry now, for God's sake. ! They are openly displaying SS and HH symbols.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited March 2014
    How should we pronounce the UKIP leader's name ? The way English is spoken or follow the continental types. Farage as in "garage" or like the French talk ?
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    surbiton said:


    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    What is Putin supposed to do ? Let Ukraine be taken over by the SS mob. They even control the Defence ministry now, for God's sake. ! They are openly displaying SS and HH symbols.

    The Falklands was British sovereign territory, that was invaded by the Argentine armed forces.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821
    edited March 2014
    I can't help feeling that Neil Hamilton saying he wants to 'see the colour' of Paul Sykes' money has rather unfortunate echoes.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    surbiton said:

    How should we pronounce the UKIP leader's name ? The way English is spoken or follow the continental types. Farage as in "garage" or like the French talk ?

    I've seen Farage being asked this in interview. His response? That he didn't really care and suggested people say it however rhymes with "garage" in their own accent.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    surbiton said:

    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    In the Falklands we were defending our own sovereign territory. In Crimea, Russia is invading a neighbour. It's not the same thing. It's not the same ball park. It's not even the same fucking sport. The left is pathetic in how it sides with the West's enemies even when they are utterly, utterly in the wrong.

  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    In the Falklands we were defending our own sovereign territory. In Crimea, Russia is invading a neighbour. It's not the same thing. It's not the same ball park. It's not even the same fucking sport. The left is pathetic in how it sides with the West's enemies even when they are utterly, utterly in the wrong.

    Fuck off, you SOB !
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    surbiton said:


    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    What is Putin supposed to do ? Let Ukraine be taken over by the SS mob. They even control the Defence ministry now, for God's sake. ! They are openly displaying SS and HH symbols.

    The Falklands was British sovereign territory, that was invaded by the Argentine armed forces.
    Is Ukraine really a country ? I am rather touched by your adherence to Stalin's policies.

  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,682
    MaxPB said:

    I think the Tories would do well to attack UKIP's record in the EU. Vote UKIP for more EU interference in Britain. Less representation means more stupid EU laws.

    Nope it makes no difference as there are still far too many Europhile Tory, Labour and Lib Dem MEPs there ready to back anything the EU says no matter what the cost for the UK.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014

    With grim news from the Ukraine, a fun Downfall parody that ties together the Costa Living Crisis and Harman's humble PIE:

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=72B6r6l5Igs


    I am sure I am just being unbelievably precious and demonstrating why that site that Mike linked to the other day had me down as 88% Lib Dem as well as 90% tory but Downfall parodies for a member of a Jewish family that fled to the UK to avoid the death camps? Really? I mean, really?

    I really don't think so.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    surbiton said:

    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    In the Falklands we were defending our own sovereign territory. In Crimea, Russia is invading a neighbour. It's not the same thing. It's not the same ball park. It's not even the same fucking sport. The left is pathetic in how it sides with the West's enemies even when they are utterly, utterly in the wrong.

    Fuck off, you SOB !
    And the mask slips...
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    surbiton said:


    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    What is Putin supposed to do ? Let Ukraine be taken over by the SS mob. They even control the Defence ministry now, for God's sake. ! They are openly displaying SS and HH symbols.

    The Falklands was British sovereign territory, that was invaded by the Argentine armed forces.
    Was Iraq sovereign territory ? Did Iraq attack Britain or the US ? Did Syria attack Britain or the US ? We were going to bomb them until our Parliament stopped us.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    In the Falklands we were defending our own sovereign territory. In Crimea, Russia is invading a neighbour. It's not the same thing. It's not the same ball park. It's not even the same fucking sport. The left is pathetic in how it sides with the West's enemies even when they are utterly, utterly in the wrong.

    Fuck off, you SOB !
    And the mask slips...
    Huh ?
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    As with the Roman Empire, eastern Ukraine is showing the danger of large scale immigration of people with no loyalty to your country. In a lot of these cities putting up Russian flags, Russians aren't anywhere near a majority, yet could still be split off. And at that point I'm sure Ukrainians will be kicked out of Russia's new puppet state.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668
    Has there ever been a time when the West might seriously have considered intervening militarily against Russia in Ukraine? They were left to get on with it in Georgia a few years back, weren't they?
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @stackee: So... you shouldn't vote *against* independence just b/c you hate Salmond, but should vote *for* if you hate Tories? http://t.co/QyQH5nxMbP
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    DavidL said:

    With grim news from the Ukraine, a fun Downfall parody that ties together the Costa Living Crisis and Harman's humble PIE:

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=72B6r6l5Igs


    I am sure I am just being unbelievably precious and demonstrating why that site that Mike linked to the other day had me down as 88% Lib Dem as well as 90% tory but Downfall parodies for a member of a Jewish family that fled to the UK to avoid the death camps? Really? I mean, really?

    I really don't think so.
    Beyond precious. You're in Harman territory.

  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    edited March 2014

    Has there ever been a time when the West might seriously have considered intervening militarily against Russia in Ukraine? They were left to get on with it in Georgia a few years back, weren't they?

    Georgia was a slightly more complicated case, as Georgia did invade autonomous regions of the country. All Ukraine has done is change to a Western-aligned government.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    DavidL said:

    With grim news from the Ukraine, a fun Downfall parody that ties together the Costa Living Crisis and Harman's humble PIE:

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=72B6r6l5Igs


    I am sure I am just being unbelievably precious and demonstrating why that site that Mike linked to the other day had me down as 88% Lib Dem as well as 90% tory but Downfall parodies for a member of a Jewish family that fled to the UK to avoid the death camps? Really? I mean, really?

    I really don't think so.
    This attack on Miliband's antecedents have a similarity on the Bush campaign's "swiftboat" attack on Kerry !

    The idea being you undermine an opponent well before the election and deliberately muddy the waters.

    The hint is they are not as "patriotic" as they make themselves out to be. Where Miliband has played the patriotic card, I am not sure but the attacks are typically vile neo-right wing types

  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Socrates said:

    Has there ever been a time when the West might seriously have considered intervening militarily against Russia in Ukraine? They were left to get on with it in Georgia a few years back, weren't they?

    Georgia was a slightly more complicated case, as Georgia did invade autonomous regions of the country. All Ukraine has done is change to a Western-aligned government.
    "a Western-aligned government" carrying swastika arm-bands and SS symbols !
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,461

    Has there ever been a time when the West might seriously have considered intervening militarily against Russia in Ukraine? They were left to get on with it in Georgia a few years back, weren't they?

    Georgia was a very different kettle of fish for Europe, tucked away as it is on the eastern side of the Black Sea. Ukraine is in a very different position geographically and geopolitically. For instance, Poland and Romania might be a little concerned about a Russian take over of all of Ukraine, if one was on the cards.

    But Putin's canny, and he'll probably have set aims that may make it very hard for the west to do anything.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014
    The savage displacement of peoples by Stalin and other soviet mass killers along with some fairly arbitrary map drawing after WW II has left a difficult legacy which makes simplistic solutions to the Ukraine very difficult. We have to be realistic about what we can do.

    Without revisiting Czechoslovakia in 1938 are we really going to go to war with the second largest nuclear power on the planet to protect the integrity of Ukraine? Absolutely no chance whatsoever. Therefore we should never have made such silly promises in the first place.

    Can the Ukraine hold together as a single unit? Possible but increasingly difficult and impossible if there is major bloodshed. Avoiding that is therefore the priority. We must emphasise this to both the Ukrainians and the Russians.

    How can it hold together? Clearly significant levels of devolution to the Russian speaking areas is required and recognition must be given to the realities of Russia's interests in the Crimea. At this stage almost any compromise short of independence is worth considering.

    Do we really want such an unstable country in the EU? Err, no, I really don't think so. We must therefore be wary of making yet more promises we cannot keep.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:


    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    What is Putin supposed to do ? Let Ukraine be taken over by the SS mob. They even control the Defence ministry now, for God's sake. ! They are openly displaying SS and HH symbols.

    The Falklands was British sovereign territory, that was invaded by the Argentine armed forces.
    Is Ukraine really a country ? I am rather touched by your adherence to Stalin's policies.

    The only one being Stalin-like is you, by denying the nationhood of a country with a far older history than Russia, in order to justify the illegal invasion and occupation of the place. But I suppose it's more preferable to support the KGB-run, Orthodox-backed kleptocrats in the Kremlin than the evil Americans right...
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Has there ever been a time when the West might seriously have considered intervening militarily against Russia in Ukraine? They were left to get on with it in Georgia a few years back, weren't they?

    Georgia was a very different kettle of fish for Europe, tucked away as it is on the eastern side of the Black Sea. Ukraine is in a very different position geographically and geopolitically. For instance, Poland and Romania might be a little concerned about a Russian take over of all of Ukraine, if one was on the cards.

    But Putin's canny, and he'll probably have set aims that may make it very hard for the west to do anything.
    JJ and Socrates and the Right in general would like us to help the Ukranians who would give their right and left arm to join the EU. Whereas, they would like to leave the EU....
  • MonikerDiCanioMonikerDiCanio Posts: 5,792
    Scott_P said:

    @stackee: So... you shouldn't vote *against* independence just b/c you hate Salmond, but should vote *for* if you hate Tories? http://t.co/QyQH5nxMbP

    Sickening and diseased image. Only a childless fanatic like Salmond could have OK'd that poster.

  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    edited March 2014
    DavidL said:

    Without revisiting Czechoslovakia in 1938 are we really going to go to war with the second largest nuclear power on the planet to protect the integrity of Ukraine? Absolutely no chance whatsoever. Therefore we should never have made such silly promises in the first place.

    If we used your logic we would have never intervened to protect Belgium or Poland in the last two major conflicts Europe has seen. Why are Ukrainians lesser people in their need to be protected? Yours is the most terrible circular argument: "We weren't going to protect Ukraine. Therefore we shouldn't have agreed to protect Ukraine. Therefore we shouldn't protect Ukraine."

    There were several days where Russia gradually amped up rhetoric to see how the West would react. When we didn't stand by Ukraine, they pushed it further in Crimea. When we barely reacted there, they are now pushing further in Eastern Ukraine. Their aims creep up a bit more the more they sense weakness. I wouldn't be surprised if the Baltic states expelled their Russian populations at this point. Just the presence of Russians in your country makes you very vulnerable to invasion. It's this limp hand-wringing response of people that express sadness but aren't willing to stand up for what is right that will see the collapse of a democratic world order. I'm sure China will be watching closely as it thinks if the future of Taiwan and the south Pacific...

  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,682
    Socrates said:

    As with the Roman Empire, eastern Ukraine is showing the danger of large scale immigration of people with no loyalty to your country. In a lot of these cities putting up Russian flags, Russians aren't anywhere near a majority, yet could still be split off. And at that point I'm sure Ukrainians will be kicked out of Russia's new puppet state.

    Rubbish. That implies there was a Ukrainian polis in existence prior to Russian arrivals. This is simply not the case. The 'natives' if you wish to use such terms are the same of the same Rus origins as those in Moscow. Nor was Eastern Ukraine ever part of either the Lithuanian or Polish kingdoms that included Western Ukraine. The country itself has no historical cohesion beyond Soviet internal borders and the idea that the ethnic Russians in the East are any less 'native' than the Polish descendants in th West is simply wrong.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,147
    edited March 2014
    surbiton said:

    Socrates said:

    Has there ever been a time when the West might seriously have considered intervening militarily against Russia in Ukraine? They were left to get on with it in Georgia a few years back, weren't they?

    Georgia was a slightly more complicated case, as Georgia did invade autonomous regions of the country. All Ukraine has done is change to a Western-aligned government.
    "a Western-aligned government" carrying swastika arm-bands and SS symbols !
    They're just a bit out date about which West to which they want to be aligned.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:


    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    What is Putin supposed to do ? Let Ukraine be taken over by the SS mob. They even control the Defence ministry now, for God's sake. ! They are openly displaying SS and HH symbols.

    The Falklands was British sovereign territory, that was invaded by the Argentine armed forces.
    Is Ukraine really a country ? I am rather touched by your adherence to Stalin's policies.

    The only one being Stalin-like is you, by denying the nationhood of a country with a far older history than Russia, in order to justify the illegal invasion and occupation of the place. But I suppose it's more preferable to support the KGB-run, Orthodox-backed kleptocrats in the Kremlin than the evil Americans right...
    The Western Ukranian's were part of Poland ! The east of Ukraine was always associated with Russia. Khruschev is from that part of the world. He may have been born just across the present day border but they are the same people. Khruschev's wife was definitely from Eastern Ukraine.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014
    surbiton said:

    DavidL said:

    With grim news from the Ukraine, a fun Downfall parody that ties together the Costa Living Crisis and Harman's humble PIE:

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=72B6r6l5Igs


    I am sure I am just being unbelievably precious and demonstrating why that site that Mike linked to the other day had me down as 88% Lib Dem as well as 90% tory but Downfall parodies for a member of a Jewish family that fled to the UK to avoid the death camps? Really? I mean, really?

    I really don't think so.
    This attack on Miliband's antecedents have a similarity on the Bush campaign's "swiftboat" attack on Kerry !

    The idea being you undermine an opponent well before the election and deliberately muddy the waters.

    The hint is they are not as "patriotic" as they make themselves out to be. Where Miliband has played the patriotic card, I am not sure but the attacks are typically vile neo-right wing types

    For the avoidance of doubt I think that Miliband deserves all the mockery he gets. He is opportunistic, shallow, deceitful and, at least in some respects, dangerous. Our only hope if he becomes PM is that he will be too incompetent to get anything done.

    But Hitler parodies for a jew who lost family in the holocaust seems in very doubtful taste to me.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,461
    surbiton said:

    Has there ever been a time when the West might seriously have considered intervening militarily against Russia in Ukraine? They were left to get on with it in Georgia a few years back, weren't they?

    Georgia was a very different kettle of fish for Europe, tucked away as it is on the eastern side of the Black Sea. Ukraine is in a very different position geographically and geopolitically. For instance, Poland and Romania might be a little concerned about a Russian take over of all of Ukraine, if one was on the cards.

    But Putin's canny, and he'll probably have set aims that may make it very hard for the west to do anything.
    JJ and Socrates and the Right in general would like us to help the Ukranians who would give their right and left arm to join the EU. Whereas, they would like to leave the EU....
    I have often said that I am on the fence about the EU; I have not made up my mind whether I would like to stay in or leave. But don't let reality get in the way of your hate-fest.

    Besides, the two are not incompatible. Someone might believe that Ukraine would be better served by being under the EU banner than under Russia's, whilst believing the UK is better off out. Different countries, different problems, and different solutions.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Socrates said:

    As with the Roman Empire, eastern Ukraine is showing the danger of large scale immigration of people with no loyalty to your country. In a lot of these cities putting up Russian flags, Russians aren't anywhere near a majority, yet could still be split off. And at that point I'm sure Ukrainians will be kicked out of Russia's new puppet state.

    Rubbish. That implies there was a Ukrainian polis in existence prior to Russian arrivals. This is simply not the case. The 'natives' if you wish to use such terms are the same of the same Rus origins as those in Moscow. Nor was Eastern Ukraine ever part of either the Lithuanian or Polish kingdoms that included Western Ukraine. The country itself has no historical cohesion beyond Soviet internal borders and the idea that the ethnic Russians in the East are any less 'native' than the Polish descendants in th West is simply wrong.
    Well put. Socrates has a tendency to re-write history. I wonder which type of the Right he learned that from ?
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    surbiton said:

    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:


    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    What is Putin supposed to do ? Let Ukraine be taken over by the SS mob. They even control the Defence ministry now, for God's sake. ! They are openly displaying SS and HH symbols.

    The Falklands was British sovereign territory, that was invaded by the Argentine armed forces.
    Is Ukraine really a country ? I am rather touched by your adherence to Stalin's policies.

    The only one being Stalin-like is you, by denying the nationhood of a country with a far older history than Russia, in order to justify the illegal invasion and occupation of the place. But I suppose it's more preferable to support the KGB-run, Orthodox-backed kleptocrats in the Kremlin than the evil Americans right...
    The Western Ukranian's were part of Poland ! The east of Ukraine was always associated with Russia. Khruschev is from that part of the world. He may have been born just across the present day border but they are the same people. Khruschev's wife was definitely from Eastern Ukraine.
    Unbelievable ignorance. That's like saying the western part of Poland was part of Germany, and the eastern part was associated with Russia, so the Poles aren't really a nation. As for "always" associated, that's just showing your lack of knowledge. Kievan civilization was once the forefront of Europe's constitutionalism and equality, when no one had even heard of the Duchy of Moscow. It was only because the Mongols invaded the place and Moscow sold out its fellow Europeans to collaborate with the barbarians that Ukraine has been under Russia's yoke.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    surbiton said:

    Socrates said:

    Has there ever been a time when the West might seriously have considered intervening militarily against Russia in Ukraine? They were left to get on with it in Georgia a few years back, weren't they?

    Georgia was a slightly more complicated case, as Georgia did invade autonomous regions of the country. All Ukraine has done is change to a Western-aligned government.
    "a Western-aligned government" carrying swastika arm-bands and SS symbols !
    Can you please link me to the government ministers wearing SS symbols? Or are you just talking about random Ukrainians? This is a pure smear on Ukraine so as to justify your apologism for the tyrant Putin.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014
    Socrates said:

    DavidL said:

    Without revisiting Czechoslovakia in 1938 are we really going to go to war with the second largest nuclear power on the planet to protect the integrity of Ukraine? Absolutely no chance whatsoever. Therefore we should never have made such silly promises in the first place.

    If we used your logic we would have never intervened to protect Belgium or Poland in the last two major conflicts Europe has seen. Why are Ukrainians lesser people in their need to be protected? Yours is the most terrible circular argument: "We weren't going to protect Ukraine. Therefore we shouldn't have agreed to protect Ukraine. Therefore we shouldn't protect Ukraine."

    There were several days where Russia gradually amped up rhetoric to see how the West would react. When we didn't stand by Ukraine, they pushed it further in Crimea. When we barely reacted there, they are now pushing further in Eastern Ukraine. Their aims creep up a bit more the more they sense weakness. I wouldn't be surprised if the Baltic states expelled their Russian populations at this point. Just the presence of Russians in your country makes you very vulnerable to invasion. It's this limp hand-wringing response of people that express sadness but aren't willing to stand up for what is right that will see the collapse of a democratic world order. I'm sure China will be watching closely as it thinks if the future of Taiwan and the south Pacific...

    What can I say? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsTRxXvQY0s

    I just hope our leaders are more realistic.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,282
    Socrates said:


    All Ukraine has done is change to a Western-aligned government.

    By a process which can legitimately be questioned. Nuland et al were very naive in encouraging a situation which gave Russia the opportunity to do this.
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    Good article by John Rentoul, not known for his love of EdM, on the significance of Labour's reforms.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/ed-milibands-labour-party-reforms-are-good-news-for-all-9162681.html

  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,498
    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    In the Falklands we were defending our own sovereign territory. In Crimea, Russia is invading a neighbour. It's not the same thing. It's not the same ball park. It's not even the same fucking sport. The left is pathetic in how it sides with the West's enemies even when they are utterly, utterly in the wrong.

    No chance of Cameron coming out from behind the sofa, and who would be scared by Wee Willie Winky. Putin must have a great laugh listening to those two losers.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,682
    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:


    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    What is Putin supposed to do ? Let Ukraine be taken over by the SS mob. They even control the Defence ministry now, for God's sake. ! They are openly displaying SS and HH symbols.

    The Falklands was British sovereign territory, that was invaded by the Argentine armed forces.
    Is Ukraine really a country ? I am rather touched by your adherence to Stalin's policies.

    The only one being Stalin-like is you, by denying the nationhood of a country with a far older history than Russia, in order to justify the illegal invasion and occupation of the place. But I suppose it's more preferable to support the KGB-run, Orthodox-backed kleptocrats in the Kremlin than the evil Americans right...
    The Western Ukranian's were part of Poland ! The east of Ukraine was always associated with Russia. Khruschev is from that part of the world. He may have been born just across the present day border but they are the same people. Khruschev's wife was definitely from Eastern Ukraine.
    Unbelievable ignorance. That's like saying the western part of Poland was part of Germany, and the eastern part was associated with Russia, so the Poles aren't really a nation. As for "always" associated, that's just showing your lack of knowledge. Kievan civilization was once the forefront of Europe's constitutionalism and equality, when no one had even heard of the Duchy of Moscow. It was only because the Mongols invaded the place and Moscow sold out its fellow Europeans to collaborate with the barbarians that Ukraine has been under Russia's yoke.
    Er no. Whilst Poland existed as a separate kingdom for hundreds of years, The Ukraine has only existed as a state since 1917 and apart from a few years was even then only a republic with the Soviet Union. The Eastern part of the country has been under the hegemony of or directly part of Russia since 1654.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,498

    Scott_P said:

    @stackee: So... you shouldn't vote *against* independence just b/c you hate Salmond, but should vote *for* if you hate Tories? http://t.co/QyQH5nxMbP

    Sickening and diseased image. Only a childless fanatic like Salmond could have OK'd that poster.

    Only sick halfwits like you and Toom Tabard could try to pretend it is real.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,033
    The head of the Ukrainian navy has apparently defected. Makes you wonder how loyal the armed services are to Kiev.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:


    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    What is Putin supposed to do ? Let Ukraine be taken over by the SS mob. They even control the Defence ministry now, for God's sake. ! They are openly displaying SS and HH symbols.

    The Falklands was British sovereign territory, that was invaded by the Argentine armed forces.
    Is Ukraine really a country ? I am rather touched by your adherence to Stalin's policies.

    The only one being Stalin-like is you, by denying the nationhood of a country with a far older history than Russia, in order to justify the illegal invasion and occupation of the place. But I suppose it's more preferable to support the KGB-run, Orthodox-backed kleptocrats in the Kremlin than the evil Americans right...
    The Western Ukranian's were part of Poland ! The east of Ukraine was always associated with Russia. Khruschev is from that part of the world. He may have been born just across the present day border but they are the same people. Khruschev's wife was definitely from Eastern Ukraine.
    Unbelievable ignorance. That's like saying the western part of Poland was part of Germany, and the eastern part was associated with Russia, so the Poles aren't really a nation. As for "always" associated, that's just showing your lack of knowledge. Kievan civilization was once the forefront of Europe's constitutionalism and equality, when no one had even heard of the Duchy of Moscow. It was only because the Mongols invaded the place and Moscow sold out its fellow Europeans to collaborate with the barbarians that Ukraine has been under Russia's yoke.
    Er no. Whilst Poland existed as a separate kingdom for hundreds of years, The Ukraine has only existed as a state since 1917 and apart from a few years was even then only a republic with the Soviet Union. The Eastern part of the country has been under the hegemony of or directly part of Russia since 1654.
    So only states that derive their sovereignty for hundreds of years are valid. What of the Baltic States, the Republic of Ireland and dozens of others?

    The indisputable fact is that Putin has authorised the invasion of a sovereign state with a view to annexing the Crimea and likely large swathes of Eastern Ukraine. This despite the fact that the Russian Federation has signed numerous treaties guaranteeing the borders of Ukraine. The fact that it is a young state is irrelevant.



  • GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    It's all very grumpy on here today.

    The cricket, on the other hand, is going rather well so far despite the fact that the talentless goon Bopara gets another undeserved cap.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    DavidL said:

    Socrates said:

    DavidL said:

    Without revisiting Czechoslovakia in 1938 are we really going to go to war with the second largest nuclear power on the planet to protect the integrity of Ukraine? Absolutely no chance whatsoever. Therefore we should never have made such silly promises in the first place.

    If we used your logic we would have never intervened to protect Belgium or Poland in the last two major conflicts Europe has seen. Why are Ukrainians lesser people in their need to be protected? Yours is the most terrible circular argument: "We weren't going to protect Ukraine. Therefore we shouldn't have agreed to protect Ukraine. Therefore we shouldn't protect Ukraine."

    There were several days where Russia gradually amped up rhetoric to see how the West would react. When we didn't stand by Ukraine, they pushed it further in Crimea. When we barely reacted there, they are now pushing further in Eastern Ukraine. Their aims creep up a bit more the more they sense weakness. I wouldn't be surprised if the Baltic states expelled their Russian populations at this point. Just the presence of Russians in your country makes you very vulnerable to invasion. It's this limp hand-wringing response of people that express sadness but aren't willing to stand up for what is right that will see the collapse of a democratic world order. I'm sure China will be watching closely as it thinks if the future of Taiwan and the south Pacific...

    What can I say? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsTRxXvQY0s

    I just hope our leaders are more realistic.

    I don't think we need to worry on that score. Hague and Kerry are in Kiev to do a bit of flag waving. They will do a bit of jaw-jaw, get on their planes and come home having done their bit.

    Who is going to war to support the neo-fascists ?
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053

    Socrates said:

    As with the Roman Empire, eastern Ukraine is showing the danger of large scale immigration of people with no loyalty to your country. In a lot of these cities putting up Russian flags, Russians aren't anywhere near a majority, yet could still be split off. And at that point I'm sure Ukrainians will be kicked out of Russia's new puppet state.

    Rubbish. That implies there was a Ukrainian polis in existence prior to Russian arrivals. This is simply not the case. The 'natives' if you wish to use such terms are the same of the same Rus origins as those in Moscow. Nor was Eastern Ukraine ever part of either the Lithuanian or Polish kingdoms that included Western Ukraine. The country itself has no historical cohesion beyond Soviet internal borders and the idea that the ethnic Russians in the East are any less 'native' than the Polish descendants in th West is simply wrong.
    Socrates, Britain now has a very large immigrant population with dubious loyalty to our country. Will you concur that by welcoming these people the last decade, our elites have put this country in danger, in times of crisis?
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    I can't help but think that some of the abuse that some PBers are directing at each other is completely outwith the MODERATORS recent strictures.

    In their likely temporary absence might I ask for some temperance of the abuse.

    Thank you.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Even the arms factories are in Kharkiv. Wasn't the T-34's made in Kharkiv ? Or, was it in the Urals ?
  • Ishmael_XIshmael_X Posts: 3,664
    DavidL said:

    With grim news from the Ukraine, a fun Downfall parody that ties together the Costa Living Crisis and Harman's humble PIE:

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=72B6r6l5Igs


    I am sure I am just being unbelievably precious and demonstrating why that site that Mike linked to the other day had me down as 88% Lib Dem as well as 90% tory but Downfall parodies for a member of a Jewish family that fled to the UK to avoid the death camps? Really? I mean, really?

    I really don't think so.
    Lots of gentiles were quite seriously discommoded by Hitler's activities, you know - there are worse things than immigrating to the UK. And Downfall has nothing whatever to do with the Jews or the death camps. So, yes, "unbelievably precious" is about right.

  • Life_ina_market_townLife_ina_market_town Posts: 2,319
    edited March 2014
    JackW said:

    So only states that derive their sovereignty for hundreds of years are valid. What of the Baltic States, the Republic of Ireland and dozens of others?

    The indisputable fact is that Putin has authorised the invasion of a sovereign state with a view to annexing the Crimea and likely large swathes of Eastern Ukraine. This despite the fact that the Russian Federation has signed numerous treaties guaranteeing the borders of Ukraine. The fact that it is a young state is irrelevant.

    We are in no position to judge, having invaded the sovereign state of Iraq in 2003, and having more recently advocated military intervention in a civil war in Syria. It is, of course, highly ironic that the Crown prosecutes British nationals (other than Crown agents and servants) who provide financial or military assistance to the Syrian opposition for supporting terrorism. The Irish Republic denied the right to self-determination of the people of Northern Ireland for most of its existence, consistently intent on annexing sovereign British territory against the wishes of its inhabitants.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,147
    edited March 2014
    surbiton said:

    Even the arms factories are in Kharkiv. Wasn't the T-34's made in Kharkiv ? Or, was it in the Urals ?

    Both, and other places including Stalingrad.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:


    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    What is Putin supposed to do ? Let Ukraine be taken over by the SS mob. They even control the Defence ministry now, for God's sake. ! They are openly displaying SS and HH symbols.

    The Falklands was British sovereign territory, that was invaded by the Argentine armed forces.
    Is Ukraine really a country ? I am rather touched by your adherence to Stalin's policies.

    The only one being Stalin-like is you, by denying the nationhood of a country with a far older history than Russia, in order to justify the illegal invasion and occupation of the place. But I suppose it's more preferable to support the KGB-run, Orthodox-backed kleptocrats in the Kremlin than the evil Americans right...
    The Western Ukranian's were part of Poland ! The east of Ukraine was always associated with Russia. Khruschev is from that part of the world. He may have been born just across the present day border but they are the same people. Khruschev's wife was definitely from Eastern Ukraine.
    Unbelievable ignorance. That's like saying the western part of Poland was part of Germany, and the eastern part was associated with Russia, so the Poles aren't really a nation. As for "always" associated, that's just showing your lack of knowledge. Kievan civilization was once the forefront of Europe's constitutionalism and equality, when no one had even heard of the Duchy of Moscow. It was only because the Mongols invaded the place and Moscow sold out its fellow Europeans to collaborate with the barbarians that Ukraine has been under Russia's yoke.
    Er no. Whilst Poland existed as a separate kingdom for hundreds of years, The Ukraine has only existed as a state since 1917 and apart from a few years was even then only a republic with the Soviet Union. The Eastern part of the country has been under the hegemony of or directly part of Russia since 1654.
    Ukraine traces its history to the Kievan Rus, and then after that's fragmentation to the Principality of Kiev. They have centuries of independence between them. Just because they have been brutally subjugated under a foreign empire for centuries since then does not make them any less of a nation.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    JackW said:

    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    Socrates said:

    surbiton said:

    surbiton said:


    Is Putin really doing anything different in the Crimea than what Britain did in the Falklands ? He is intervening on the side of kith and kin. Whether you like it or not that is what we did in the Falklands.

    What is Putin supposed to do ? Let Ukraine be taken over by the SS mob. They even control the Defence ministry now, for God's sake. ! They are openly displaying SS and HH symbols.

    The Falklands was British sovereign territory, that was invaded by the Argentine armed forces.
    Is Ukraine really a country ? I am rather touched by your adherence to Stalin's policies.

    ...
    The Western Ukranian's were part of Poland ! The east of Ukraine was always associated with Russia. Khruschev is from that part of the world. He may have been born just across the present day border but they are the same people. Khruschev's wife was definitely from Eastern Ukraine.
    Unbelievable ignorance. That's like saying the western part of Poland was part of Germany, and the eastern part was associated with Russia, so the Poles aren't really a nation. As for "always" associated, that's just showing your lack of knowledge. Kievan civilization was once the forefront of Europe's constitutionalism and equality, when no one had even heard of the Duchy of Moscow. It was only because the Mongols invaded the place and Moscow sold out its fellow Europeans to collaborate with the barbarians that Ukraine has been under Russia's yoke.
    Er no. Whilst Poland existed as a separate kingdom for hundreds of years, The Ukraine has only existed as a state since 1917 and apart from a few years was even then only a republic with the Soviet Union. The Eastern part of the country has been under the hegemony of or directly part of Russia since 1654.
    So only states that derive their sovereignty for hundreds of years are valid. What of the Baltic States, the Republic of Ireland and dozens of others?

    The indisputable fact is that Putin has authorised the invasion of a sovereign state with a view to annexing the Crimea and likely large swathes of Eastern Ukraine. This despite the fact that the Russian Federation has signed numerous treaties guaranteeing the borders of Ukraine. The fact that it is a young state is irrelevant.

    All very well Jack ! What was your position on the West attacking the sovereign state of Iraq ? Did the attack the US or UK ?

    Oops, sorry ! If we do it, then it is OK.


  • Y0kelY0kel Posts: 2,307
    edited March 2014
    Ukraine: No choices

    The plan to call up reserves is the clearest statement that the Ukrainians know no one is going to honour any treaties. Its also a sharp reverse of the 'we will not be provoked' line trotted out by Kiev. At this point, a failure to mobilise is effectively inviting Russia in when it feels like it. Moscow isn't answering the phone so it's time to prepare to defend itself. They will fight when it comes to it.

    The difficulty for the Ukrainians is this:

    In doing this mobilisation Russia can self justify it as a new threat.

    What exactly are they mobilising? There will be forces, they will be available, there is kit in stores, but what forces and how well organised? The problem then is how well sustained will they be? The next days will tell but some omens are not good, the navy in particular is deeply fractured and resignations abound...more of them today.

    So far the signs are are that the self defense troops who formed up in the civic disturbances are not waiting to see, they are mobilising themselves. This in itself is the development of a potential second force of militias, when the Ukrainians need one military, despite the statements that these will work with the defence ministry


  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    Socrates said:


    All Ukraine has done is change to a Western-aligned government.

    By a process which can legitimately be questioned. Nuland et al were very naive in encouraging a situation which gave Russia the opportunity to do this.
    Being able to "question" something does not give free reign for a foreign invasion. This is a clear and umabiguous abrogation of international law and illegal invasion.
  • Socrates said:

    Ukraine traces its history to the Kievan Rus, and then after that's fragmentation to the Principality of Kiev. They have centuries of independence between them. Just because they have been brutally subjugated under a foreign empire for centuries since then does not make them any less of a nation.

    For all its many flaws, you would do well to read E.J.E. Hobsbawm's Nations and Nationalism since 1780, (Cambridge, 1990).
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    MikeK said:

    Socrates said:

    As with the Roman Empire, eastern Ukraine is showing the danger of large scale immigration of people with no loyalty to your country. In a lot of these cities putting up Russian flags, Russians aren't anywhere near a majority, yet could still be split off. And at that point I'm sure Ukrainians will be kicked out of Russia's new puppet state.

    Rubbish. That implies there was a Ukrainian polis in existence prior to Russian arrivals. This is simply not the case. The 'natives' if you wish to use such terms are the same of the same Rus origins as those in Moscow. Nor was Eastern Ukraine ever part of either the Lithuanian or Polish kingdoms that included Western Ukraine. The country itself has no historical cohesion beyond Soviet internal borders and the idea that the ethnic Russians in the East are any less 'native' than the Polish descendants in th West is simply wrong.
    Socrates, Britain now has a very large immigrant population with dubious loyalty to our country. Will you concur that by welcoming these people the last decade, our elites have put this country in danger, in times of crisis?
    What a disgraceful comment.

    A notable number of immigrants serve in the armed forces and their forebears served and died for our nation in two world wars and before and since. One of our most recent holders of the VC, Johnson Beharry, is an immigrant.

    Shame on you.

  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322

    Socrates said:

    As with the Roman Empire, eastern Ukraine is showing the danger of large scale immigration of people with no loyalty to your country. In a lot of these cities putting up Russian flags, Russians aren't anywhere near a majority, yet could still be split off. And at that point I'm sure Ukrainians will be kicked out of Russia's new puppet state.

    Rubbish. That implies there was a Ukrainian polis in existence prior to Russian arrivals. This is simply not the case. The 'natives' if you wish to use such terms are the same of the same Rus origins as those in Moscow. Nor was Eastern Ukraine ever part of either the Lithuanian or Polish kingdoms that included Western Ukraine. The country itself has no historical cohesion beyond Soviet internal borders and the idea that the ethnic Russians in the East are any less 'native' than the Polish descendants in th West is simply wrong.
    This denial of Ukrainian nationhood is stunning to me. Tell that to the dozens of protesters who have been shot dead after standing up for their independence through unarmed protests under sniper fire. Ukrainians have had a separate identity to Russians for centuries, and the Russians that now inhabit Eastern Ukraine were moved in under Soviet rule. In the decades after a forced famine on ethnic Ukrainians.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    GeoffM said:

    It's all very grumpy on here today.

    The cricket, on the other hand, is going rather well so far despite the fact that the talentless goon Bopara gets another undeserved cap.

    Bopara wasn't part of the Coward's XV in Australia ! Swann, on the other hand, is raking it in, sitting as an "expert" after deserting in mid series. When is a contract not a contract ?
  • Edin_RokzEdin_Rokz Posts: 516
    JackW said:

    I can't help but think that some of the abuse that some PBers are directing at each other is completely outwith the MODERATORS recent strictures.v

    In their likely temporary absence might I ask for some temperance of the abuse.

    Thank you.

    Have to agree with JackW, I have only just come back to the site today, and I am horrified by some of the vitriol spouted by some of the commentators that I have mostly respected, today.

    I can only think that people are a little scared of the potential of a war that we may be sucked into by accident.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    malcolmg said:

    Scott_P said:

    @stackee: So... you shouldn't vote *against* independence just b/c you hate Salmond, but should vote *for* if you hate Tories? http://t.co/QyQH5nxMbP

    Sickening and diseased image. Only a childless fanatic like Salmond could have OK'd that poster.

    Only sick halfwits like you and Toom Tabard could try to pretend it is real.
    Do you not find the juxtaposition of a baby's nose with rusty scissors unsettling?

    Its certainly impactful, whether its wise may be another matter......

    Salmond for cute babies, Unionists for botched operations with unsterile equipment may be a step too far.......
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Socrates said:

    Socrates said:

    As with the Roman Empire, eastern Ukraine is showing the danger of large scale immigration of people with no loyalty to your country. In a lot of these cities putting up Russian flags, Russians aren't anywhere near a majority, yet could still be split off. And at that point I'm sure Ukrainians will be kicked out of Russia's new puppet state.

    Rubbish. That implies there was a Ukrainian polis in existence prior to Russian arrivals. This is simply not the case. The 'natives' if you wish to use such terms are the same of the same Rus origins as those in Moscow. Nor was Eastern Ukraine ever part of either the Lithuanian or Polish kingdoms that included Western Ukraine. The country itself has no historical cohesion beyond Soviet internal borders and the idea that the ethnic Russians in the East are any less 'native' than the Polish descendants in th West is simply wrong.
    This denial of Ukrainian nationhood is stunning to me. Tell that to the dozens of protesters who have been shot dead after standing up for their independence through unarmed protests under sniper fire. Ukrainians have had a separate identity to Russians for centuries, and the Russians that now inhabit Eastern Ukraine were moved in under Soviet rule. In the decades after a forced famine on ethnic Ukrainians.
    You are confusing the East Ukranians with many in the Crimea. Many in the East are Russians, just like Muscovites, obviously, with different accents etc.

    Many Crimeans were Muslims who were transported to Uzbekistan by Stalin. I am sure you would not be worrying about them.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,682
    Socrates said:



    Ukraine traces its history to the Kievan Rus, and then after that's fragmentation to the Principality of Kiev. They have centuries of independence between them. Just because they have been brutally subjugated under a foreign empire for centuries since then does not make them any less of a nation.

    Yep I was waiting for that argument. I look forward to your proposal that the Assyrian Empire should be reformed in central Turkey (after all it still existed in some form around Lake Van up until 1918*) and that we should support them in their fight for their ancestral homelands. They would have more claim to their lands than the Kievien Rus have for the Crimea.

    No one is saying that Kiev cannot have its happy little fascist state under EU protection. They are just saying that the right to that state does not extend to the East and South which weer never even part of the Kievan Rus Kingdom (if you really think that we should base modern borders on long lost ancient kingdoms with no continuity of existence).

    I am waiting for the Dalraidians to press their claim for independence in western Scotland. That would make the whole SNP debate far more interesting.

    *When we helped evacuate them in advance of the Turks and then betrayed them in camps in Mesopotamia
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    edited March 2014
    Edin_Rokz said:

    JackW said:

    I can't help but think that some of the abuse that some PBers are directing at each other is completely outwith the MODERATORS recent strictures.v

    In their likely temporary absence might I ask for some temperance of the abuse.

    Thank you.

    Have to agree with JackW, I have only just come back to the site today, and I am horrified by some of the vitriol spouted by some of the commentators that I have mostly respected, today.

    I can only think that people are a little scared of the potential of a war that we may be sucked into by accident.
    Actually, on this thread I have been told to "fuck off", called a son of a bitch, and been told I have taken a tendency to rewrite history from the far right. I feel I have remained remarkably restrained considering this. As always on this board, if you don't respond, the nasty party is allowed to continue. If you do respond, it gets treated like you are both equally responsible.
  • BobaFettBobaFett Posts: 2,789
    DavidL said:

    The savage displacement of peoples by Stalin and other soviet mass killers along with some fairly arbitrary map drawing after WW II has left a difficult legacy which makes simplistic solutions to the Ukraine very difficult. We have to be realistic about what we can do.

    Without revisiting Czechoslovakia in 1938 are we really going to go to war with the second largest nuclear power on the planet to protect the integrity of Ukraine? Absolutely no chance whatsoever. Therefore we should never have made such silly promises in the first place.

    Can the Ukraine hold together as a single unit? Possible but increasingly difficult and impossible if there is major bloodshed. Avoiding that is therefore the priority. We must emphasise this to both the Ukrainians and the Russians.

    How can it hold together? Clearly significant levels of devolution to the Russian speaking areas is required and recognition must be given to the realities of Russia's interests in the Crimea. At this stage almost any compromise short of independence is worth considering.

    Do we really want such an unstable country in the EU? Err, no, I really don't think so. We must therefore be wary of making yet more promises we cannot keep.

    Interesting post, David.

    I think one of the great problems with the former soviet countries is they were, pretty much, broken up along internal SSR boundaries, some of which were arbitrary and counter intuitive. The Crimea, for example, is, for all intents and purposes, Russian. It is more Russia than some areas which actually in Russia. Yet, because it was in the Ukrainian SSR, it is now in the state of Ukraine.
  • BobaFettBobaFett Posts: 2,789
    I think one of the great problems with the former soviet countries is they were, pretty much, broken up along internal SSR boundaries, some of which were arbitrary and counter intuitive. The Crimea, for example, is, for all intents and purposes, Russian. It is more Russian than some areas which are actually in Russia. Yet, because it was in the Ukrainian SSR, it is now in the state of Ukraine.
  • SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    BobaFett said:

    I think one of the great problems with the former soviet countries is they were, pretty much, broken up along internal SSR boundaries, some of which were arbitrary and counter intuitive. The Crimea, for example, is, for all intents and purposes, Russian. It is more Russian than some areas which are actually in Russia. Yet, because it was in the Ukrainian SSR, it is now in the state of Ukraine.

    The only reason it is ethnically Russian majority is because the original population of Crimean Tatars were ethnically cleansed back in the 1940s. The minority Tatar population today strongly supports remaining in Ukraine. Should ethnic cleansing be rewarded? Particularly under a process of illegal invasion?
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    edited March 2014
    @surbiton and @Life_ina_market_town

    I supported the first Gulf War but not the second.

    The fact that the UK has made mistakes in the past shouldn't preclude the present government from taking action in the future.

    Surely we know the consequences of indulging Putin and accepting his probable "I have no more territorial claims in Europe" gambit.

    Perhaps next he'd like to take a slice out of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia and establish a corridor to Kaliningrad. How about a chunk of Belarus and Moldova ? .... and while he's at it if he absorbs Crimea and Eastern Ukraine why not annex the rest of Ukraine too .... just to keeps matters simple you understand.

    And then there's a whole swathe of bits and bobs in Asia to consume ....
  • BobaFettBobaFett Posts: 2,789
    @JackW

    Just playing Devil's Advocate, if the majority of people East of the Dneiper wanted to become part of Russia, would you advocate its annexation?
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    The major lesson from this Ukraine biz is..You cannot trust the Russians..in business or in International agreements...
This discussion has been closed.