Categories
Betting on Lee Anderson to defect – politicalbetting.com
Betting on Lee Anderson to defect – politicalbetting.com
The news will fuel speculation that Lee Anderson is about to join Reform UK. Full story on @GBNEWS website.https://t.co/zhKR949WD7
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Thought I'd share so we can set up a therapy group, sharing is caring after all.
@BritainElects
📊 Labour lead at 18pts
Westminster voting intention:
LAB: 44% (+2)
CON: 26% (-2)
LDEM: 10% (-)
REF: 10% (+2)
GRN: 4% (-)
via @Savanta_UK, 23 - 25 Feb"
I'm not talking about her attitudes towards private schooling but to her attitudes towards RTB.
Can you show me where she has attacked RTB as a policy?
If you cannot, I will assume that you are talking utter garbage.
Next you'll be saying that post-damascene investment bankers who keep all their hard-earned cash but preach redistribution are good socialists.
Galloway may well still win but I don't see value at the current odds.
I've backed Gorgeous too though - so I'd advise punters to avoid.
And if a non-wealthy person preaches redistribution then it is the "politics of envy".
For ye Fowle and Un-natural Crimes, ye are guilte…
Ye shall be taken from this Place to A Place of Incarceration… Con Home.. Piers Corbyn, Piers Morgan… Pineapple Pizza….
He might be using Reform talks as a bit of leverage.
My niece (and now nephew-in-law) had two wedding ceremonies. Firstly, a Sikh ceremony and, the following week, a humanist ceremony.
Later we discovered that neither of these was their actual wedding - they'd been to the registry office the week before it all kicked off with parents and siblings to do the official stuff.
However he may justifiably feel he has more chance of holding Ashfield as a Reform candidate than a Tory, Ashfield had never elected a Tory MP at a general election until 2019 when he won it and even then only for Boris to get Brexit done
If they had had more notice and got their fingers out then LDs would have been in with a shout with nobody wanting anyone else, but they don't appear to have done so (on the basis that there has been zippo from the LDs on the by election).
Is anyone campaigning there? Galloway I assume.
Where and when has she been hypocritical?
'Traditionally' also includes hanging and flogging, but also sound money, an effective defence, functioning courts, etc. etc. so it doesn't mean much with the current C&UP, and as for Reform I'm not familiar with them except they like the same sort of things.
Not the same as a humanist wedding.
My son's wedding was a civil wedding, in a hotel.
Scotland has the sensible rule that a wedding can take place anywhere, so long as the person conducting the wedding is authorised, whether a registrar, a humanist celebrant or a religious person.
https://www.lgcplus.com/services/housing/shadow-housing-minister-we-need-to-turn-the-tap-off-on-right-to-buy-20-10-2022/
But now it supports and is profiteering from it. The houses were built using public funds as social housing. Tenants have been offered a discount to buy those houses, effectively receiving a transfer from the public purse. The Left excoriated Fatcha when she introduced it.
And now Rayner is making a few quid off the poorest in society from it.
Where's a mural painter when you need one.
CNN - Supreme Court questions Florida and Texas social media laws on First Amendment grounds
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/26/tech/supreme-court-social-media/index.html
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/68411597
DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY
Joseph R. Biden Jr.
618,426 81.1% = 109 delegates
Uncommitted
101,100 13.3%
Marianne Williamson
22,706 3.0%
Dean Phillips
20,465 2.7%
Total votes reported
762,697
REPUBLICAN PRIMARY
Donald J. Trump
756,851 68.2% = 12 delegates
Nikki Haley
294,884 26.6% = 4 delegates
Uncommitted
33,404 3.0%
Ron DeSantis
13,368 1.2%
Chris Christie
4,762 0.4%0.4
Vivek Ramaswamy
3,705 0.3%0.3
Ryan Binkley
2,356 0.2%0.2
Asa Hutchinson
1,084 0.1%0.1
Total votes reported
1,110,414
But 40 years of suppression destroyed so much productive capacity that the number of new starts is still way below where it needs to be.
Seriously, f**** off
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/voices-i-live-in-a-no-go-area-of-london-this-is-what-it-s-really-like/ar-BB1iY3OS?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=b4fca1599a684e429b2d4f70de4e00c7&ei=13
Ahem.
But we're talking about Angela Rayner, who doesn't oppose RTB and who is in a party whose policy is not to oppose RTB. Ergo, no hypocrisy.
No smoke without fire etc.
Air France is setting a new pace for European airlines
Your Gazette Travel Correspondent in A Mild Tramadol and Margaux Haze
It probably doesn't make much difference as, on the whole, the decent buys will have gone long before the rule change, and nobody in their right mind would buy the unsold leftovers. (Interesting question how many, if at all, of the leftovers are even worth buying in gentrifying areas as opposed to being scheduled for demolition.)
So, we should indeed be thankful for these reports from people on the inside.
Over the last few years I've run nearly every road and path within a large area surrounding my home (exc. motorways, obvs...) I've never once felt fearful from people I've seen or met. The runs are often at night or in the dark.
But some female friends *are* fearful of being on the streets at night, even within my town which is not exactly crime central. And the worst thing is, I cannot say they're wrong to feel fear. As a six-foot-two man, my experience of an area might be very different to that of a woman. A somewhat elderly male acquaintances also has some fears.
Fear may be rational or irrational; but the rationality is often very dependent on viewpoint and experience.
Exactly the sort of behaviour that good Lab types should indulge in. I wouldn't be surprised if the only reason they support the policy is to shore up her flank as she knew she was otherwise exposed.
But, yes, Tower Hamlets has some of the most desirable areas to live in the country. Still not seeing much evidence for them - or any other part of the borough - being no-go areas.
I have the same view (in most cases) of identifying your sex when these days it is irrelevant for most purposes. I think it is bizarre that you are asked for your sex on a multitude of forms where it simply is irrelevant and that for instance letters get addressed to Mr/Mrs/Ms but not to the Fat, Old White Person at 3 Acacia Ave. Why is one more relevant than the other descriptions?
"In 2023, around four million houses were occupied by households socially renting. The largest shares of social rented households in England during the period under observation were 2000 and 2001, when a total of almost 20 percent of all households were recorded as socially rented"
https://www.statista.com/statistics/286509/england-number-of-social-rented-households/
You do know that register offices have existed since 1837?
Because, when is it ever a bad time to hear @RochdalePioneers’s 30p Lee Anderson Lament?
Answer: never
So here it is again
https://app.suno.ai/song/91270dcb-ef95-45f7-b6d2-acc5c3bb8a12
Indeed my son who is in education and has 3 children supports the concept
You looked to see if the rear turret on the milk float was a Rose turret or the Frazer Nash crap.
Come on, who was it? @TheScreamingEagles? @bondegazou? @OnlyLivingBoy?
Quite unbelievable that anyone in this day and age would have banned people from getting married unless they were "religious".