Sunak next CON leader? I’m not convinced – politicalbetting.com
Sunak has been favourite for the Conservative leadership for so long now that it is almost becoming an established fact that this will eventually happen. But does he have the backing of enough MPs and is the betting price wrong?
There seems to be a lot of rumours of the supposed Ukrainian offensive against the breakaway republics starting tonight. This of course ignores the fact the Ukrainians have had some years to do this and haven't, and probably wouldn't anyway. As it is, yet another mark in the column of excuses for Russia to justify an attack.
Perhaps more concerning, plenty of pictures of Russian military vehicles sporting IFF motifs. For the uninitiated, these markings help make sure you can identify your forces from the enemy. Especially useful when you have a lot of kit in common.
Finally, the stories are that the US has prepped to support some kind of Ukrainian insurgency. This assumes a) an attack which Russia clearly has in the options and is certainly positioned to do and b) that any attack is a Day-1 full scale invasion of all of Ukraine, which as yet I wouldn't quite be so confident will necessarily be the case, even though all the tools are in place.
And remember, as I mentioned nearly couple of weeks ago, Sundays are always days to watch.
Also worth remembering Russia is running out of time before the frozen ground becomes mud.
Also natural gas demand is quite seasonal. As we get into March, European demand for gas falls quite quickly.
Sunak is in charge of the most tax greedy Exchequer of all time. The right (ie tories who decide who their leader is )dont like this and as for voters ,well even if you buy the argument that taxes need to rise , then raising National insurance was the most unfair tax to rise - The tories were right when they said NI was a tax on jobs (and labour) ,its a pity Sunak has ignored that message 15 years on. Also the level of fraud on furlough schemes, eat out to help out , SEISS grants is literally criminal
There seems to be a lot of rumours of the supposed Ukrainian offensive against the breakaway republics starting tonight. This of course ignores the fact the Ukrainians have had some years to do this and haven't, and probably wouldn't anyway. As it is, yet another mark in the column of excuses for Russia to justify an attack.
Perhaps more concerning, plenty of pictures of Russian military vehicles sporting IFF motifs. For the uninitiated, these markings help make sure you can identify your forces from the enemy. Especially useful when you have a lot of kit in common.
Finally, the stories are that the US has prepped to support some kind of Ukrainian insurgency. This assumes a) an attack which Russia clearly has in the options and is certainly positioned to do and b) that any attack is a Day-1 full scale invasion of all of Ukraine, which as yet I wouldn't quite be so confident will necessarily be the case, even though all the tools are in place.
And remember, as I mentioned nearly couple of weeks ago, Sundays are always days to watch.
Also worth remembering Russia is running out of time before the frozen ground becomes mud.
Also natural gas demand is quite seasonal. As we get into March, European demand for gas falls quite quickly.
He may just be waiting for his mates winter olympic party to finish . look out on Monday. He would quite like China on side I would think
But seriously on Russia/Ukraine I've tried following Mary Dejevsky on twitter. She's a former foreign correspondent for the Times after all. It is frankly bizarre. She states that the deployment of troops on the Ukraine border could equally be a defensive move rather than an offensive one, that we should stop trying to read Putin's mind and instead just believe what he tells us (he's a straightforward fellow!) and that he really is just concerned about the expansion of Nato to Russia's borders.
There is the interesting point as to why Biden/Zelensky seem to differ so much on Russia's probability of attacking but the rest just seems barking mad.
Meanwhile, the other day I suggested that those British who wish to rejoin the EU might be best moving to Scotland, claiming Scottish citizenship (which at the moment isn't a thing) and waiting for independence, then for Scotland to vote to join the EU. As tortuous a route as summiting K2 in winter.
There is another option and it really comes to the fore with this evening's comments by Sinn Fein deputy leader Michelle O'Neill. She's suggesting that the Irish gov't prepares for a united Ireland. She sees it as the consequence of [Boris' ridiculous] Irish sea issue. This raises the intriguing prospect that to become an EU citizen anyone in Britain might not need to claim Irish ancestry as at present but simply to be in the right place at the right time viz a viz the current Northern Ireland. Wow.
Well, I've (my company) just received an email from some domain registration company in China saying that someone wants to register a company with the China suffix using my name (which is an unusual one) and asking if they are my distribution partner.
I assume this is a scam and I should not reply..... yes?
But seriously on Russia/Ukraine I've tried following Mary Dejevsky on twitter. She's a former foreign correspondent for the Times after all. It is frankly bizarre. She states that the deployment of troops on the Ukraine border could equally be a defensive move rather than an offensive one, that we should stop trying to read Putin's mind and instead just believe what he tells us (he's a straightforward fellow!) and that he really is just concerned about the expansion of Nato to Russia's borders.
There is the interesting point as to why Biden/Zelensky seem to differ so much on Russia's probability of attacking but the rest just seems barking mad.
Especially strange when you can buy commercial satellite imagery on the open market that shows that the Russian military build up is multiple times bigger than any forces in Ukraine, or indeed in any of the NATO countries *beyond* Ukraine.
Agree Sunak is not going to be next leader as things stand.
If a new leader is needed now then it is at a time when government and ministers have collectively acted badly, and any one of them could be destroyed by fresh revelations, and continue the cycle.
If new leader is later, economic events to come will mean the chancellor is in a sub optimal position.
His best chance has gone. Which was resignation some weeks ago.
Finally, though he is very very good he comes across as a number 2/number 3 not number 1. Similar in a sense to Ed Miliband, who is also very good but not number 1. Politicians have learned from 'the wrong brother' that you have to pick Number 1 candidate.
Footnote: Corbyn was a Number Z candidate, but was allowed to stand by democratically minded MPs like Frank Field, and elected by a dim membership. They won't make that mistake again for a bit. T May was a Number Z candidate too, but rose to the top is strange and unique circumstances.
Hunt for me would be the best bet both politically and betting wise.
Well, I've (my company) just received an email from some domain registration company in China saying that someone wants to register a company with the China suffix using my name (which is an unusual one) and asking if they are my distribution partner.
I assume this is a scam and I should not reply..... yes?
Well, I've (my company) just received an email from some domain registration company in China saying that someone wants to register a company with the China suffix using my name (which is an unusual one) and asking if they are my distribution partner.
I assume this is a scam and I should not reply..... yes?
well i suppose you woudl only reply if you were bothered (if it were genuine) in any case that a company will use your name for its business ventures. There is an estate in California that uses my name and they are welcome to ! All adds to the brand !
Well, I've (my company) just received an email from some domain registration company in China saying that someone wants to register a company with the China suffix using my name (which is an unusual one) and asking if they are my distribution partner.
I assume this is a scam and I should not reply..... yes?
Sunak is in charge of the most tax greedy Exchequer of all time. The right (ie tories who decide who their leader is )dont like this and as for voters ,well even if you buy the argument that taxes need to rise , then raising National insurance was the most unfair tax to rise - The tories were right when they said NI was a tax on jobs (and labour) ,its a pity Sunak has ignored that message 15 years on. Also the level of fraud on furlough schemes, eat out to help out , SEISS grants is literally criminal
Totally agree.
The fissure within Conservative economic policy beggars belief. I don't like blaming Carrie for things but some of this does go back to her: quasi left-wing very green policies which sit at odds with the right wing conservative laissez-faire approach. But this must also be in large measure because Boris Johnson himself not only has no moral compass, but for Conservatives far more importantly he has no political compass. He's all over the bloody shop. There is no defining vision or ethos, nothing that coheres.
So we end up with a massive contradiction of policies, a spendthrift Gov't which would have made even Labour eyes water coupled with huge tax rises.
If this massive Tax and Spend had come from Jim Callaghan, Harold Wilson or that dreadful Jeremy Corbyn the press would have hounded them out of office.
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
Meanwhile, the other day I suggested that those British who wish to rejoin the EU might be best moving to Scotland, claiming Scottish citizenship (which at the moment isn't a thing) and waiting for independence, then for Scotland to vote to join the EU. As tortuous a route as summiting K2 in winter.
There is another option and it really comes to the fore with this evening's comments by Sinn Fein deputy leader Michelle O'Neill. She's suggesting that the Irish gov't prepares for a united Ireland. She sees it as the consequence of [Boris' ridiculous] Irish sea issue. This raises the intriguing prospect that to become an EU citizen anyone in Britain might not need to claim Irish ancestry as at present but simply to be in the right place at the right time viz a viz the current Northern Ireland. Wow.
Agree with united Ireland FWIW but the Scotland thing has to deal with the EU border with England issue, but without the benefit of the Irish Sea. Only when the SNP start saying that there are no difficulties between GB, NI and EU and that something even more complicated will work fine for Gretna and Berwick, and explain to us what it is, will this be credible.
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
You are aware that the misogynistic Tory MPs who got rid of Theresa May are the same* ones who appointed her in the first place, right?
Sunak is, or could be, the head of the "sound on Brexit, still has a chance of winning the next election" group. Which, after all, is why Johnson got the job.
Possible that Sunak himself asked MPs to wait. He may prefer to take over later, when he can blame his boss for the NI rise, and deploy a pre-election income tax cut.
One thing I was thinking today: if Russia does invade Ukraine, I'm expecting lots of videos of war crimes against civilians to rapidly be posted on social media by both sides. Some of these will be real, others will not.
This will be one of the first wars which will be fought on the Internet and information channels as much as on the ground.
Expect lots of talks of how the west 'poked' Russia into this.
Would be more useful if they could get rid of that useless twat Marvin Rees.
I've no idea. Not enough knowledge about what is happening in Bristol to be honest, other than for years it has been said that the only likely 2nd green MP will be in Bristol.*
The Estonian PM is back in Tallinn from Munich, where she and the other Baltic leaders met with Kamela Harris and seem to have been given a briefing on why the US beleives that Russia still intends to launch an attack against Ukraine. More to the point the US and the UK have given a complete pledge to back Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia with full military measures, should the conflict spill over in our direction. I would say that the mood in Tallinn is fairly fatalist, although there is some relief that the promised British troops are finally on their way. It does seem that the last 24 hours has ramped up the risk of a Russian invasion in Ukraine quite a bit but Estonians are equally concerned about some other unexpected move from the Kremlin. As others have noted here, these are not ideal circumstances for a successful invasion and it is quite clear that NATO has a full intelligence read out on the current order of battle. Ukrainian troops are taking some punishment at the line of contact with the green men and Russian forces but for the moment it seems that Russia is still holding off on the final go/no go decision.
I still think Putin would be making a possibly fatal mistake and that the Ukrainian army is capable of inflicting severe damage on the invading forces. Any occupation will be fiercely resisted and I am not even sure that Russia can rely on air superiority, given the large numbers of anti aircraft and drone weapons that Ukraine clearly posesses. The Estonians are suggesting that the crisis could last quite a long time if the war becomes a deadlock. Under those circumstances then the situation could get very dangerous indeed. We take refuge in rather black humour, but the prospect of another Russian occupation of the Baltic, when the last one killed a third of the population, is not something that any of us take lightly.
Well, I've (my company) just received an email from some domain registration company in China saying that someone wants to register a company with the China suffix using my name (which is an unusual one) and asking if they are my distribution partner.
I assume this is a scam and I should not reply..... yes?
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
Frankly, you have no idea about the Conservative Party! We had a woman as Conservative leader in 1975. 47 years on, after two, the Labour Party still hasn't had one. You really want to talk misogyny in political parties?
Bit early to write off Rishi Sunak, methinks. Long-term anyway, as he's only 41 years old.
Took Sir Anthony Eden about twenty years to advance from Foreign Secretary (first appointment) to Prime Minister.
And RS reminds me of AE, though I am NOT attributing any of the latter's shortcomings to the former.
The problem I think is the one William Hague had: wrong timing.
Sunak's best chance was up until a fortnight ago.
If Johnson survives until the GE, and loses, can you really see the tories regaining power after one term? I just don't see it. Not after holding the keys to Downing St since 2010. Sunak might become leader but he'll end up like William Hague, not that I think Sunak has anything like Hague's charisma.
But seriously on Russia/Ukraine I've tried following Mary Dejevsky on twitter. She's a former foreign correspondent for the Times after all. It is frankly bizarre. She states that the deployment of troops on the Ukraine border could equally be a defensive move rather than an offensive one, that we should stop trying to read Putin's mind and instead just believe what he tells us (he's a straightforward fellow!) and that he really is just concerned about the expansion of Nato to Russia's borders.
There is the interesting point as to why Biden/Zelensky seem to differ so much on Russia's probability of attacking but the rest just seems barking mad.
Mary Dejevsky is a reliable Putinbot, Always supportive for the Kremlin line.
One thing I was thinking today: if Russia does invade Ukraine, I'm expecting lots of videos of war crimes against civilians to rapidly be posted on social media by both sides. Some of these will be real, others will not.
This will be one of the first wars which will be fought on the Internet and information channels as much as on the ground.
Expect lots of talks of how the west 'poked' Russia into this.
Which one was it where they were using bit of obscure WWII movies as propaganda of current events?
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
Frankly, you have no idea about the Conservative Party! We had a woman as Conservative leader in 1975. 47 years on, after two, the Labour Party still hasn't had one. You really want to talk misogyny in political parties?
Not only have they not had one, but no woman has ever beaten any man in any Labour leadership election.
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
Frankly, you have no idea about the Conservative Party!
Oh I do ...
But I'll leave that right there in terms of my upbringing and current contacts.
The party in parliament is very misogynistic at the moment. They turned on Theresa May. Had her deal have been presented by a man there's a good chance it would have gone through. But they decided that her dithering was a female trait.
They had one brilliant female leader. Most of them (in parliament I mean) are resigned to the fact that she was unique.
Do not bet on another female leader of the Conservative Party anytime soon. It will be money down the drain.
The Estonian PM is back in Tallinn from Munich, where she and the other Baltic leaders met with Kamela Harris and seem to have been given a briefing on why the US beleives that Russia still intends to launch an attack against Ukraine. More to the point the US and the UK have given a complete pledge to back Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia with full military measures, should the conflict spill over in our direction. I would say that the mood in Tallinn is fairly fatalist, although there is some relief that the promised British troops are finally on their way. It does seem that the last 24 hours has ramped up the risk of a Russian invasion in Ukraine quite a bit but Estonians are equally concerned about some other unexpected move from the Kremlin. As others have noted here, these are not ideal circumstances for a successful invasion and it is quite clear that NATO has a full intelligence read out on the current order of battle. Ukrainian troops are taking some punishment at the line of contact with the green men and Russian forces but for the moment it seems that Russia is still holding off on the final go/no go decision.
I still think Putin would be making a possibly fatal mistake and that the Ukrainian army is capable of inflicting severe damage on the invading forces. Any occupation will be fiercely resisted and I am not even sure that Russia can rely on air superiority, given the large numbers of anti aircraft and drone weapons that Ukraine clearly posesses. The Estonians are suggesting that the crisis could last quite a long time if the war becomes a deadlock. Under those circumstances then the situation could get very dangerous indeed. We take refuge in rather black humour, but the prospect of another Russian occupation of the Baltic, when the last one killed a third of the population, is not something that any of us take lightly.
But seriously on Russia/Ukraine I've tried following Mary Dejevsky on twitter. She's a former foreign correspondent for the Times after all. It is frankly bizarre. She states that the deployment of troops on the Ukraine border could equally be a defensive move rather than an offensive one, that we should stop trying to read Putin's mind and instead just believe what he tells us (he's a straightforward fellow!) and that he really is just concerned about the expansion of Nato to Russia's borders.
There is the interesting point as to why Biden/Zelensky seem to differ so much on Russia's probability of attacking but the rest just seems barking mad.
Mary Dejevsky is a reliable Putinbot, Always supportive for the Kremlin line.
I'm not sure it's quite that. More a useful idiot possibly.
I'm sure I speak for many by saying your comments on how this is viewed in Estonia adds greatly to the site.
But seriously on Russia/Ukraine I've tried following Mary Dejevsky on twitter. She's a former foreign correspondent for the Times after all. It is frankly bizarre. She states that the deployment of troops on the Ukraine border could equally be a defensive move rather than an offensive one, that we should stop trying to read Putin's mind and instead just believe what he tells us (he's a straightforward fellow!) and that he really is just concerned about the expansion of Nato to Russia's borders.
There is the interesting point as to why Biden/Zelensky seem to differ so much on Russia's probability of attacking but the rest just seems barking mad.
Mary Dejevsky is a reliable Putinbot, Always supportive for the Kremlin line.
I'm not sure it's quite that. More a useful idiot possibly.
I'm sure I speak for many by saying your comments on how this is viewed in Estonia adds greatly to the site.
Bit early to write off Rishi Sunak, methinks. Long-term anyway, as he's only 41 years old.
Took Sir Anthony Eden about twenty years to advance from Foreign Secretary (first appointment) to Prime Minister.
And RS reminds me of AE, though I am NOT attributing any of the latter's shortcomings to the former.
The problem I think is the one William Hague had: wrong timing.
Sunak's best chance was up until a fortnight ago.
If Johnson survives until the GE, and loses, can you really see the tories regaining power after one term? I just don't see it. Not after holding the keys to Downing St since 2010. Sunak might become leader but he'll end up like William Hague, not that I think Sunak has anything like Hague's charisma.
The world of Eden is a world away. Nobody in public life has the patience to stick it out like that. Everything moves at Internet time.
Regardless of what you think about @BorisJohnson, he has risen to the occasion at #MSC2022 with a clear & compelling message on Russia, democratic values & even the Indo-Pacific & Chinese coercion against Lithuania. Other leaders missed their opportunity to do so
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
Frankly, you have no idea about the Conservative Party! We had a woman as Conservative leader in 1975. 47 years on, after two, the Labour Party still hasn't had one. You really want to talk misogyny in political parties?
Not only have they not had one, but no woman has ever beaten any man in any Labour leadership election.
It seems scarcely believable when put that way.
Not when you look at the calibre of those involved.
As a woman let me be the first to say that this shouldn't be about tokenism and I don't think it's the place of men to call out misogynism.
I think Rachel Reeves looks a really good prospect. I personally really like Angela Rayner but she would be too gobby for the right wing media.
Penny Mordaunt would make a great Labour leader in the Keir Starmer real politik.
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
Frankly, you have no idea about the Conservative Party! We had a woman as Conservative leader in 1975. 47 years on, after two, the Labour Party still hasn't had one. You really want to talk misogyny in political parties?
Not only have they not had one, but no woman has ever beaten any man in any Labour leadership election.
It seems scarcely believable when put that way.
Not when you look at the calibre of those involved.
As a woman let me be the first to say that this shouldn't be about tokenism and I don't think it's the place of men to call out misogynism.
I think Rachel Reeves looks a really good prospect. I personally really like Angela Rayner but she would be too gobby for the right wing media.
Penny Mordaunt would make a great Labour leader in the Keir Starmer real politik.
I have a small bet on Jess Phillips. I have no idea why.
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
I think there is a deep set Tory desire for a second Thatcher. It was both a benefit and a curse for May. Instagram Liz clearly sees herself in that mold even if no one else does. Morduant fits the spec rather better. Good value IMO.
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
You are aware that the misogynistic Tory MPs who got rid of Theresa May are the same* ones who appointed her in the first place, right?
*more-or-less
May would have been fine except she invited Johnson, Davis and Fox back into the fold.
But seriously on Russia/Ukraine I've tried following Mary Dejevsky on twitter. She's a former foreign correspondent for the Times after all. It is frankly bizarre. She states that the deployment of troops on the Ukraine border could equally be a defensive move rather than an offensive one, that we should stop trying to read Putin's mind and instead just believe what he tells us (he's a straightforward fellow!) and that he really is just concerned about the expansion of Nato to Russia's borders.
There is the interesting point as to why Biden/Zelensky seem to differ so much on Russia's probability of attacking but the rest just seems barking mad.
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
Frankly, you have no idea about the Conservative Party! We had a woman as Conservative leader in 1975. 47 years on, after two, the Labour Party still hasn't had one. You really want to talk misogyny in political parties?
Not only have they not had one, but no woman has ever beaten any man in any Labour leadership election.
It seems scarcely believable when put that way.
Not when you look at the calibre of those involved.
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
Frankly, you have no idea about the Conservative Party! We had a woman as Conservative leader in 1975. 47 years on, after two, the Labour Party still hasn't had one. You really want to talk misogyny in political parties?
Not only have they not had one, but no woman has ever beaten any man in any Labour leadership election.
It seems scarcely believable when put that way.
Not when you look at the calibre of those involved.
As a woman let me be the first to say that this shouldn't be about tokenism and I don't think it's the place of men to call out misogynism.
I think Rachel Reeves looks a really good prospect. I personally really like Angela Rayner but she would be too gobby for the right wing media.
Penny Mordaunt would make a great Labour leader in the Keir Starmer real politik.
I have a small bet on Jess Phillips. I have no idea why.
I suspect the 'reason why' is that she has plenty of charisma. If Starmer fails to become PM his lack of charisma will be a big factor and Labour will probably select their next leader accordingly. Rayner fits the bill too; Reeves, not so much.
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
I think there is a deep set Tory desire for a second Thatcher. It was both a benefit and a curse for May. Instagram Liz clearly sees herself in that mold even if no one else does. Morduant fits the spec rather better. Good value IMO.
I think Mother Leadsom would have been a good PM. She was a competent Minister - Boris shouldn't have tossed her out but I suppose there was a major personality clash.
On independence day, I will be in my friends’ spare room in Lisburn. Hope that’s enough to claim citizenship, given that Scottish citizenship is not going to happen in my lifetime, thanks to Sturgeon and her acolytes.
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
Frankly, you have no idea about the Conservative Party! We had a woman as Conservative leader in 1975. 47 years on, after two, the Labour Party still hasn't had one. You really want to talk misogyny in political parties?
Not only have they not had one, but no woman has ever beaten any man in any Labour leadership election.
It seems scarcely believable when put that way.
Not when you look at the calibre of those involved.
As a woman let me be the first to say that this shouldn't be about tokenism and I don't think it's the place of men to call out misogynism.
I think Rachel Reeves looks a really good prospect. I personally really like Angela Rayner but she would be too gobby for the right wing media.
Penny Mordaunt would make a great Labour leader in the Keir Starmer real politik.
I have a small bet on Jess Phillips. I have no idea why.
I think the next Labour leader will be female. Apart from Streeting (and it is a bit early for him) all the leading candidates are. Leaders tend to be chosen for what their predecessor lacked, and Jess has charisma. Worth a punt IMO.
Regardless of what you think about @BorisJohnson, he has risen to the occasion at #MSC2022 with a clear & compelling message on Russia, democratic values & even the Indo-Pacific & Chinese coercion against Lithuania. Other leaders missed their opportunity to do so
Bit early to write off Rishi Sunak, methinks. Long-term anyway, as he's only 41 years old.
Took Sir Anthony Eden about twenty years to advance from Foreign Secretary (first appointment) to Prime Minister.
And RS reminds me of AE, though I am NOT attributing any of the latter's shortcomings to the former.
The problem I think is the one William Hague had: wrong timing.
Sunak's best chance was up until a fortnight ago.
If Johnson survives until the GE, and loses, can you really see the tories regaining power after one term? I just don't see it. Not after holding the keys to Downing St since 2010. Sunak might become leader but he'll end up like William Hague, not that I think Sunak has anything like Hague's charisma.
Timing helps, though I suspect really great leaders make their own time. Hague was something of an exception, though his big mistake was grabbing the job a bit early. Apart from that, there aren't that many people who would have been great PMs but we're thwarted by the political pendulum, are there? Perhaps Ken Clarke, but he was ruled out for other reasons. Maybe Dennis Healey.
And that's what might thwart Sunak. Bright, industrious, affable. But does he have the Killer Instinct, or is he waiting for someone to give him a promotion because he deserves it? After Boris, a reduction of Killer Instinct might be a blessed relief, but it won't get Master Sunak the keys to No 10. Head Boy maybe, but not Prime Minister.
But seriously on Russia/Ukraine I've tried following Mary Dejevsky on twitter. She's a former foreign correspondent for the Times after all. It is frankly bizarre. She states that the deployment of troops on the Ukraine border could equally be a defensive move rather than an offensive one, that we should stop trying to read Putin's mind and instead just believe what he tells us (he's a straightforward fellow!) and that he really is just concerned about the expansion of Nato to Russia's borders.
There is the interesting point as to why Biden/Zelensky seem to differ so much on Russia's probability of attacking but the rest just seems barking mad.
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
You are aware that the misogynistic Tory MPs who got rid of Theresa May are the same* ones who appointed her in the first place, right?
*more-or-less
May would have been fine except she invited Johnson, Davis and Fox back into the fold.
Putting Brexiteers in charge of Brexit was an interesting gambit. 2 of 3 were discredited by the process, and Johnson was a cap Foregn Secretary, but they shat all over her deal too.
It would have been interesting if she had pursued a more bipartisan rather than sectarian approach. It may well have worked rather better.
I think this is pb at work. I really like Penny which for a leftie like me is saying something.
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
Before the first woman leader of the righteous and progressive Labour Party or not?
One thing I was thinking today: if Russia does invade Ukraine, I'm expecting lots of videos of war crimes against civilians to rapidly be posted on social media by both sides. Some of these will be real, others will not.
This will be one of the first wars which will be fought on the Internet and information channels as much as on the ground.
Expect lots of talks of how the west 'poked' Russia into this.
Which one was it where they were using bit of obscure WWII movies as propaganda of current events?
On that day, with Britain deep in the pandemic, Lister, Johnson’s chief strategic adviser, spent an hour on Microsoft Teams, answering questions and addressing the concerns of donors.
According to a source, board members — whose investments spanned property, construction and big tobacco — were alarmed by the effect of Covid-19 on their businesses.
A number of those present requested swift action, including the relaxation of measures designed to stop transmission.
Lister — whose salary was publicly funded, albeit secretly topped up by a Tory donor — was all ears, according to a witness. “It was implied that what we said would go straight up to the PM,” they said. “It was a two-way street. They gave us information on what was going on. We gave our advice.”
Meanwhile, the other day I suggested that those British who wish to rejoin the EU might be best moving to Scotland, claiming Scottish citizenship (which at the moment isn't a thing) and waiting for independence, then for Scotland to vote to join the EU. As tortuous a route as summiting K2 in winter.
There is another option and it really comes to the fore with this evening's comments by Sinn Fein deputy leader Michelle O'Neill. She's suggesting that the Irish gov't prepares for a united Ireland. She sees it as the consequence of [Boris' ridiculous] Irish sea issue. This raises the intriguing prospect that to become an EU citizen anyone in Britain might not need to claim Irish ancestry as at present but simply to be in the right place at the right time viz a viz the current Northern Ireland. Wow.
The Common Travel Area means that every British citizen has the right to live and work in Ireland. You qualify for Irish citizenship after six years. Three if you're married to an Irish citizen.
Regardless of what you think about @BorisJohnson, he has risen to the occasion at #MSC2022 with a clear & compelling message on Russia, democratic values & even the Indo-Pacific & Chinese coercion against Lithuania. Other leaders missed their opportunity to do so
On that day, with Britain deep in the pandemic, Lister, Johnson’s chief strategic adviser, spent an hour on Microsoft Teams, answering questions and addressing the concerns of donors.
According to a source, board members — whose investments spanned property, construction and big tobacco — were alarmed by the effect of Covid-19 on their businesses.
A number of those present requested swift action, including the relaxation of measures designed to stop transmission.
Lister — whose salary was publicly funded, albeit secretly topped up by a Tory donor — was all ears, according to a witness. “It was implied that what we said would go straight up to the PM,” they said. “It was a two-way street. They gave us information on what was going on. We gave our advice.”
The Estonian PM is back in Tallinn from Munich, where she and the other Baltic leaders met with Kamela Harris and seem to have been given a briefing on why the US beleives that Russia still intends to launch an attack against Ukraine. More to the point the US and the UK have given a complete pledge to back Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia with full military measures, should the conflict spill over in our direction. I would say that the mood in Tallinn is fairly fatalist, although there is some relief that the promised British troops are finally on their way. It does seem that the last 24 hours has ramped up the risk of a Russian invasion in Ukraine quite a bit but Estonians are equally concerned about some other unexpected move from the Kremlin. As others have noted here, these are not ideal circumstances for a successful invasion and it is quite clear that NATO has a full intelligence read out on the current order of battle. Ukrainian troops are taking some punishment at the line of contact with the green men and Russian forces but for the moment it seems that Russia is still holding off on the final go/no go decision.
I still think Putin would be making a possibly fatal mistake and that the Ukrainian army is capable of inflicting severe damage on the invading forces. Any occupation will be fiercely resisted and I am not even sure that Russia can rely on air superiority, given the large numbers of anti aircraft and drone weapons that Ukraine clearly posesses. The Estonians are suggesting that the crisis could last quite a long time if the war becomes a deadlock. Under those circumstances then the situation could get very dangerous indeed. We take refuge in rather black humour, but the prospect of another Russian occupation of the Baltic, when the last one killed a third of the population, is not something that any of us take lightly.
NATO, including British, troops would be better placed, in my view, stationed in the Baltic states than near Ukraine. Northern Estonia, with naval support threatening St. Petersburg, blockading Russian exit to the Baltic, would show intent of retaliation if Russia invaded Ukraine.
There seems to be a lot of rumours of the supposed Ukrainian offensive against the breakaway republics starting tonight. This of course ignores the fact the Ukrainians have had some years to do this and haven't, and probably wouldn't anyway. As it is, yet another mark in the column of excuses for Russia to justify an attack.
Perhaps more concerning, plenty of pictures of Russian military vehicles sporting IFF motifs. For the uninitiated, these markings help make sure you can identify your forces from the enemy. Especially useful when you have a lot of kit in common.
Finally, the stories are that the US has prepped to support some kind of Ukrainian insurgency. This assumes a) an attack which Russia clearly has in the options and is certainly positioned to do and b) that any attack is a Day-1 full scale invasion of all of Ukraine, which as yet I wouldn't quite be so confident will necessarily be the case, even though all the tools are in place.
And remember, as I mentioned nearly couple of weeks ago, Sundays are always days to watch.
Also worth remembering Russia is running out of time before the frozen ground becomes mud.
Also natural gas demand is quite seasonal. As we get into March, European demand for gas falls quite quickly.
Just coming back to this point, I do wonder if Putin has missed his chance for this year. An attack in late November, early December would have been as natural gas demands for both heating and power were rising sharply in Europe. There would have been real pain in replacing the flow of Russian natural gas.
But storage in Europe is pretty much at peak levels (which is very rare for this time of year), demand is falling as it warms up, and solar is going to start kicking in on the electricity supply side.
The medium term outlook for gas is also ameliorating. The US rig count is really starting to motor now (quicker than I'd expected, for sure), and if it continues then there will be a lot of spot cargoes coming out of the US this year.
Cutting off the supply of Russian gas in early winter is basically impossible. Cutting it off in March on the other hand, especially if you can secure a few tens of LNG cargoes, and suddenly it doesn't look quite so frightening. And we're only two years away from Mozambique LNG and Qatargas extensions - which will further weaken Russia's position.
Sunak is in charge of the most tax greedy Exchequer of all time. The right (ie tories who decide who their leader is )dont like this and as for voters ,well even if you buy the argument that taxes need to rise , then raising National insurance was the most unfair tax to rise - The tories were right when they said NI was a tax on jobs (and labour) ,its a pity Sunak has ignored that message 15 years on. Also the level of fraud on furlough schemes, eat out to help out , SEISS grants is literally criminal
Totally agree.
The fissure within Conservative economic policy beggars belief. I don't like blaming Carrie for things but some of this does go back to her: quasi left-wing very green policies which sit at odds with the right wing conservative laissez-faire approach. But this must also be in large measure because Boris Johnson himself not only has no moral compass, but for Conservatives far more importantly he has no political compass. He's all over the bloody shop. There is no defining vision or ethos, nothing that coheres.
So we end up with a massive contradiction of policies, a spendthrift Gov't which would have made even Labour eyes water coupled with huge tax rises.
If this massive Tax and Spend had come from Jim Callaghan, Harold Wilson or that dreadful Jeremy Corbyn the press would have hounded them out of office.
Don't blame Carrie. Blame Jeremy Corbyn. Labour came unexpectedly close in 2017 and CCHQ pinched the popular bits for 2019. Even without Covid, and even without Net Zero, the government intended to spend (or invest) a great deal of money and any Conservative backbencher surprised by this needs to give their head a wobble.
I think Sunak has lost his chance. Boris will survive until 2024, if not beyond. The next Conservative leader may well not be one of the current challengers. I would put money on someone like @Tissue_Price before Rishi Sunak or Liz Truss. As well as @Tissue_Price, I would place a small bet on Ruth Davidson and Tom Tugendhat.
Meanwhile, the other day I suggested that those British who wish to rejoin the EU might be best moving to Scotland, claiming Scottish citizenship (which at the moment isn't a thing) and waiting for independence, then for Scotland to vote to join the EU. As tortuous a route as summiting K2 in winter.
There is another option and it really comes to the fore with this evening's comments by Sinn Fein deputy leader Michelle O'Neill. She's suggesting that the Irish gov't prepares for a united Ireland. She sees it as the consequence of [Boris' ridiculous] Irish sea issue. This raises the intriguing prospect that to become an EU citizen anyone in Britain might not need to claim Irish ancestry as at present but simply to be in the right place at the right time viz a viz the current Northern Ireland. Wow.
The Common Travel Area means that every British citizen has the right to live and work in Ireland. You qualify for Irish citizenship after six years. Three if you're married to an Irish citizen.
Moving to another part of the UK in pursuit of EU citizenship is a drastic step. Especially as such future rights are only hypothetical, and not certain or even remotely guaranteed. It just won't even occur to anything but a tiny group of people.
The Estonian PM is back in Tallinn from Munich, where she and the other Baltic leaders met with Kamela Harris and seem to have been given a briefing on why the US beleives that Russia still intends to launch an attack against Ukraine. More to the point the US and the UK have given a complete pledge to back Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia with full military measures, should the conflict spill over in our direction. I would say that the mood in Tallinn is fairly fatalist, although there is some relief that the promised British troops are finally on their way. It does seem that the last 24 hours has ramped up the risk of a Russian invasion in Ukraine quite a bit but Estonians are equally concerned about some other unexpected move from the Kremlin. As others have noted here, these are not ideal circumstances for a successful invasion and it is quite clear that NATO has a full intelligence read out on the current order of battle. Ukrainian troops are taking some punishment at the line of contact with the green men and Russian forces but for the moment it seems that Russia is still holding off on the final go/no go decision.
I still think Putin would be making a possibly fatal mistake and that the Ukrainian army is capable of inflicting severe damage on the invading forces. Any occupation will be fiercely resisted and I am not even sure that Russia can rely on air superiority, given the large numbers of anti aircraft and drone weapons that Ukraine clearly posesses. The Estonians are suggesting that the crisis could last quite a long time if the war becomes a deadlock. Under those circumstances then the situation could get very dangerous indeed. We take refuge in rather black humour, but the prospect of another Russian occupation of the Baltic, when the last one killed a third of the population, is not something that any of us take lightly.
NATO, including British, troops would be better placed, in my view, stationed in the Baltic states than near Ukraine. Northern Estonia, with naval support threatening St. Petersburg, blockading Russian exit to the Baltic, would show intent of retaliation if Russia invaded Ukraine.
British tanks "almost" reached St Petersburg in 1919....
There seems to be a lot of rumours of the supposed Ukrainian offensive against the breakaway republics starting tonight. This of course ignores the fact the Ukrainians have had some years to do this and haven't, and probably wouldn't anyway. As it is, yet another mark in the column of excuses for Russia to justify an attack.
Perhaps more concerning, plenty of pictures of Russian military vehicles sporting IFF motifs. For the uninitiated, these markings help make sure you can identify your forces from the enemy. Especially useful when you have a lot of kit in common.
Finally, the stories are that the US has prepped to support some kind of Ukrainian insurgency. This assumes a) an attack which Russia clearly has in the options and is certainly positioned to do and b) that any attack is a Day-1 full scale invasion of all of Ukraine, which as yet I wouldn't quite be so confident will necessarily be the case, even though all the tools are in place.
And remember, as I mentioned nearly couple of weeks ago, Sundays are always days to watch.
Also worth remembering Russia is running out of time before the frozen ground becomes mud.
Also natural gas demand is quite seasonal. As we get into March, European demand for gas falls quite quickly.
Just coming back to this point, I do wonder if Putin has missed his chance for this year. An attack in late November, early December would have been as natural gas demands for both heating and power were rising sharply in Europe. There would have been real pain in replacing the flow of Russian natural gas.
But storage in Europe is pretty much at peak levels (which is very rare for this time of year), demand is falling as it warms up, and solar is going to start kicking in on the electricity supply side.
The medium term outlook for gas is also ameliorating. The US rig count is really starting to motor now (quicker than I'd expected, for sure), and if it continues then there will be a lot of spot cargoes coming out of the US this year.
Cutting off the supply of Russian gas in early winter is basically impossible. Cutting it off in March on the other hand, especially if you can secure a few tens of LNG cargoes, and suddenly it doesn't look quite so frightening. And we're only two years away from Mozambique LNG and Qatargas extensions - which will further weaken Russia's position.
On another point, there might be an energy-related issue to do with Storm Eunice. One of three chimneys at a 1.2GW power station on the Isle of Grain collapsed during the storm. This potentially put one of the three units out of use for months - not just because of the lack of the chimney, but also because of the place it landed.
One unit out of three at one power station would not be a problem. Except several other power stations have similar chimneys, and there's a non-negligible chance that there's a flaw that might take them all out of commission for a period whilst they are altered or replaced.
Comments
Mordaunt looks a better bet.
But seriously on Russia/Ukraine I've tried following Mary Dejevsky on twitter. She's a former foreign correspondent for the Times after all. It is frankly bizarre. She states that the deployment of troops on the Ukraine border could equally be a defensive move rather than an offensive one, that we should stop trying to read Putin's mind and instead just believe what he tells us (he's a straightforward fellow!) and that he really is just concerned about the expansion of Nato to Russia's borders.
There is the interesting point as to why Biden/Zelensky seem to differ so much on Russia's probability of attacking but the rest just seems barking mad.
Rishi Sunak is the Indian heritage David Miliband.
Lest we forget he is a coward who is only Chancellor because he was prepared to wear the political gimp mask handed to him by Dom Cummings.
He will not feature in any profiles in courage.
You are my favourite London club.
Edit - Feck VAR.
Meanwhile, the other day I suggested that those British who wish to rejoin the EU might be best moving to Scotland, claiming Scottish citizenship (which at the moment isn't a thing) and waiting for independence, then for Scotland to vote to join the EU. As tortuous a route as summiting K2 in winter.
There is another option and it really comes to the fore with this evening's comments by Sinn Fein deputy leader Michelle O'Neill. She's suggesting that the Irish gov't prepares for a united Ireland. She sees it as the consequence of [Boris' ridiculous] Irish sea issue. This raises the intriguing prospect that to become an EU citizen anyone in Britain might not need to claim Irish ancestry as at present but simply to be in the right place at the right time viz a viz the current Northern Ireland. Wow.
https://news.sky.com/story/sinn-fein-deputy-leader-michelle-oneill-urges-irish-government-to-prepare-for-a-united-ireland-12545895
Well, I've (my company) just received an email from some domain registration company in China saying that someone wants to register a company with the China suffix using my name (which is an unusual one) and asking if they are my distribution partner.
I assume this is a scam and I should not reply..... yes?
(This is in no way influenced by the bet I have on him. )
If a new leader is needed now then it is at a time when government and ministers have collectively acted badly, and any one of them could be destroyed by fresh revelations, and continue the cycle.
If new leader is later, economic events to come will mean the chancellor is in a sub optimal position.
His best chance has gone. Which was resignation some weeks ago.
Finally, though he is very very good he comes across as a number 2/number 3 not number 1. Similar in a sense to Ed Miliband, who is also very good but not number 1. Politicians have learned from 'the wrong brother' that you have to pick Number 1 candidate.
Footnote: Corbyn was a Number Z candidate, but was allowed to stand by democratically minded MPs like Frank Field, and elected by a dim membership. They won't make that mistake again for a bit. T May was a Number Z candidate too, but rose to the top is strange and unique circumstances.
Hunt for me would be the best bet both politically and betting wise.
The fissure within Conservative economic policy beggars belief. I don't like blaming Carrie for things but some of this does go back to her: quasi left-wing very green policies which sit at odds with the right wing conservative laissez-faire approach. But this must also be in large measure because Boris Johnson himself not only has no moral compass, but for Conservatives far more importantly he has no political compass. He's all over the bloody shop. There is no defining vision or ethos, nothing that coheres.
So we end up with a massive contradiction of policies, a spendthrift Gov't which would have made even Labour eyes water coupled with huge tax rises.
If this massive Tax and Spend had come from Jim Callaghan, Harold Wilson or that dreadful Jeremy Corbyn the press would have hounded them out of office.
I have a friend who worked very closely with him for several years and that friend was incredulous at your suggestion.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-60430720
And that's why I don't think she will get it. She's far too pleasant. Too much in touch with the common people. Too with it. Too savvy.
This isn't me being snide. It's because the people who elect the next Conservative leader are 1. Tory MPs and 2. Conservative Members.
If it was the public, or pb.com, very different story.
Oh and tory MPs are pretty misogynistic. After what they deem the nightmare of Theresa May (I thought she was okay) I don't believe they will elect another woman for a long time.
*more-or-less
Aaron Bastani @AaronBastani
Scottish nationalists want to join the EU, adopt Euro & be a part of NATO.
All perfectly fine, of course, but what is the point of independence?
https://twitter.com/AaronBastani/status/1495111938291994625
Took Sir Anthony Eden about twenty years to advance from Foreign Secretary (first appointment) to Prime Minister.
And RS reminds me of AE, though I am NOT attributing any of the latter's shortcomings to the former.
Possible that Sunak himself asked MPs to wait. He may prefer to take over later, when he can blame his boss for the NI rise, and deploy a pre-election income tax cut.
This will be one of the first wars which will be fought on the Internet and information channels as much as on the ground.
Expect lots of talks of how the west 'poked' Russia into this.
* Assuming Jeeza doesn't defect.
*Grabs tinfoil hat and ducks*
I still think Putin would be making a possibly fatal mistake and that the Ukrainian army is capable of inflicting severe damage on the invading forces. Any occupation will be fiercely resisted and I am not even sure that Russia can rely on air superiority, given the large numbers of anti aircraft and drone weapons that Ukraine clearly posesses. The Estonians are suggesting that the crisis could last quite a long time if the war becomes a deadlock. Under those circumstances then the situation could get very dangerous indeed. We take refuge in rather black humour, but the prospect of another Russian occupation of the Baltic, when the last one killed a third of the population, is not something that any of us take lightly.
"I've got a degree from the university of National Union of Mine Workers in unity and in solidarity. That does me."
https://twitter.com/ucu/status/1494770858493157382
Sunak's best chance was up until a fortnight ago.
If Johnson survives until the GE, and loses, can you really see the tories regaining power after one term? I just don't see it. Not after holding the keys to Downing St since 2010. Sunak might become leader but he'll end up like William Hague, not that I think Sunak has anything like Hague's charisma.
It seems scarcely believable when put that way.
But I'll leave that right there in terms of my upbringing and current contacts.
The party in parliament is very misogynistic at the moment. They turned on Theresa May. Had her deal have been presented by a man there's a good chance it would have gone through. But they decided that her dithering was a female trait.
They had one brilliant female leader. Most of them (in parliament I mean) are resigned to the fact that she was unique.
Do not bet on another female leader of the Conservative Party anytime soon. It will be money down the drain.
I'm sure I speak for many by saying your comments on how this is viewed in Estonia adds greatly to the site.
https://twitter.com/noahbarkin/status/1495009820314853377?s=21
The UK government - and Opposition - have been robust on this
As a woman let me be the first to say that this shouldn't be about tokenism and I don't think it's the place of men to call out misogynism.
I think Rachel Reeves looks a really good prospect. I personally really like Angela Rayner but she would be too gobby for the right wing media.
Penny Mordaunt would make a great Labour leader in the Keir Starmer real politik.
https://twitter.com/marydejevsky/status/1495021870344769543
Dear @AndrewGimson, beg to differ. #Skripals is one of most scandalous - & successful - disinfo exercises by @govUK…
https://twitter.com/SkySportsPL/status/1495117638783152128
And that's what might thwart Sunak. Bright, industrious, affable. But does he have the Killer Instinct, or is he waiting for someone to give him a promotion because he deserves it? After Boris, a reduction of Killer Instinct might be a blessed relief, but it won't get Master Sunak the keys to No 10. Head Boy maybe, but not Prime Minister.
Why would Russia risk its reputation so close to the World Cup, when it hoped to show a friendlier face to the world?
It would have been interesting if she had pursued a more bipartisan rather than sectarian approach. It may well have worked rather better.
But I remember the time they used an image from a computer game as 'proof' that the US were helping ISIS:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-41991012
I had to read the bit in bold three times.
On that day, with Britain deep in the pandemic, Lister, Johnson’s chief strategic adviser, spent an hour on Microsoft Teams, answering questions and addressing the concerns of donors.
According to a source, board members — whose investments spanned property, construction and big tobacco — were alarmed by the effect of Covid-19 on their businesses.
A number of those present requested swift action, including the relaxation of measures designed to stop transmission.
Lister — whose salary was publicly funded, albeit secretly topped up by a Tory donor — was all ears, according to a witness. “It was implied that what we said would go straight up to the PM,” they said. “It was a two-way street. They gave us information on what was going on. We gave our advice.”
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-ultra-rich-tory-donors-with-access-to-boris-johnsons-top-team-96bvcwcxl
It makes perfect sense to me.
Could it simply be that the Corbyn Brexit fanboi Bastani doesn't understand a non-Leaver interpretation of sovereignty and independence within the EU.
Bastani is twinned with JRM.
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/why-ive-changed-my-mind-on-brexit/
Or at least, he says he did. Should be noted Dr Aaron Peters is not the most reliable source in the universe.
Ukrainian interior minister and military officials come under shelling attack during tour of frontline of the separatist conflict in eastern Ukraine
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10530887/Ukrainian-interior-minister-comes-shelling-attack-tour-frontline-east-Ukraine.html?ito=social-twitter_mailonline
https://mobile.twitter.com/noahbarkin/followers_you_follow
But storage in Europe is pretty much at peak levels (which is very rare for this time of year), demand is falling as it warms up, and solar is going to start kicking in on the electricity supply side.
The medium term outlook for gas is also ameliorating. The US rig count is really starting to motor now (quicker than I'd expected, for sure), and if it continues then there will be a lot of spot cargoes coming out of the US this year.
Cutting off the supply of Russian gas in early winter is basically impossible. Cutting it off in March on the other hand, especially if you can secure a few tens of LNG cargoes, and suddenly it doesn't look quite so frightening. And we're only two years away from Mozambique LNG and Qatargas extensions - which will further weaken Russia's position.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-60448384
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_campaign_in_the_Baltic_(1918–1919)
One unit out of three at one power station would not be a problem. Except several other power stations have similar chimneys, and there's a non-negligible chance that there's a flaw that might take them all out of commission for a period whilst they are altered or replaced.
https://www.kentlive.news/news/kent-news/storm-eunice-isle-grain-power-6685526