Best Of

Antoniazzi amendment passes easily:

For: 379
Against : 137
Majority: 242

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2le12114j9o

Division list:

https://votes.parliament.uk/votes/commons/division/2058

Next step, infanticide.

Totally shocking and irresponsible decision, there are sound medical reasons for the abortion limit of 24 weeks. Where was the debate and conversation with the public?

Not really. That term limit still exists I think? Just a woman cannot be prosecuted for terminating her own baby after the limit. I assume medical professionals still can’t perform abortions after that point?

So back street abortions are now allowed but those performed in a proper medical setting aren't.

I'm not sure that's anything to applaud.

So is it back to the old days of a bottle of gin and a knitting needle ?

Is it clear what this means in reality.?

Are our law makers confident that a baby aborted by an amateur will actually be delivered dead? Suppose the child is alive on arrival? Is mother allowed to kill him/her?

Nothing has changed other than the woman herself is no longer committing a criminal offence. Any abortions happening outside the approved channels were illegal and are still illegal.

So this is one of those non-crime crimes. That still leaves open the question of what happens if the late term baby is delivered alive instead of dead. The mother doesn't want the child. Who will take it into care immediately? Is the mother still not committing a crime if she induces death after delivery? How will the remains be dealt with? Does it go into the organic waste recycling bin for collection next week?

If a child is born alive then anyone who kills it is committing murder (including the mother). I am fairly certain that is clear in law.

Also, it is not a non-crime. A person or persons aiding a woman in terminating a pregnancy would presumably still be committing a criminal offence. For example, if a doctor was doing this sort of thing on the side.

I understand that the poor woman has to do this alone. But I don't see how a DIY abortion can be all that safe for her and surely, the later she leaves it the less safe it becomes. But anyone who helps her out is liable to prosecution.

Recipe for disaster, I'd say.

This discussion reminds me of the debates/arguments I had in the early days of my relationship with my now wife. She was at the time fiercely Catholic and anti-abortion.

It’s one of the nastiest political topics out there, I think because both sides seem to feel burning righteousness and anger on behalf of their cause. The right of a woman to have control over her own body and the right of a viable at or near-term baby to the chance of being born seem both to be irreconcilable absolutes. The one crumb of comfort is that we’re talking about something pretty rare in reality.

I think it’s regrettable it’s come up suddenly like this. I’m not entirely sure it needed to be legislated, if what’s really at stake is police over-zealously investigating vulnerable women. Could guidance have achieved this? I think the majority of the population feel the current term limits are about right.

But I also know it’s really none of my business. Because I’m a man, and we don’t have to deal with pregnancy or childbirth or being left carrying the baby of an abusive partner. Unless fathers were to be equally liable to prosecution as accessories in these cases, it remains an issue about women that should be settled by women.

Absurd to think that as a man you don’t deserve an opinion on week 40 abortions.

Yes. It's like saying only the victims of a murderer can have a say on whether the villain is executed

We got over that 500 years ago, with general principles of law. We can take into account - and we should do so - personal feelings, victim statements, human impact - but the whole point of the law is that it raises each case out of the mire of individuated emotions - at least that is its aim

So we all have a say on the death penalty, as a society, and we all have a say on when a fetus becomes human, and has a right to life of its own, whatever the mother may think. And polls show that 99% of Brits think that moment comes well before "full term" - for the very good reason that a baby in utero at 40 weeks is a fully formed human being. This is disgraceful

Antoniazzi amendment passes easily:

For: 379
Against : 137
Majority: 242

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2le12114j9o

Division list:

https://votes.parliament.uk/votes/commons/division/2058

Next step, infanticide.

Totally shocking and irresponsible decision, there are sound medical reasons for the abortion limit of 24 weeks. Where was the debate and conversation with the public?

Quite

Astonishing the way this has been briskly smuggled past the public. It's such a huge and profound debate, which deserves intense scrutiny, yet suddenly it is rushed into law?

We have become an unserious nation, with comical morality. We can no longer sneer at the Americans, at least they CARE about these fundamental things - eg the rights of the unborn. We just casually toss them in the skip

I despise our political classes, of all stripes. We need rid of them ALL

Get a grip you grumpy old man

You don't think the right to life of a nine month old fetus, entirely viable, waiting to be born, is worthy of debate?


You tiresome little REDACTED

No.

It's not been born and its the woman's body.

Just kill the little fucker.

But he's been posting here for years!

😎

Decriminalising abortion up to birth ought to be enough for any of them.
Kendall, for she is disgusting (and a massive rebellion looms)

There must be quite a few parents of extremely young infants who would wish they could turn the clock back a few days. Why not, what's the difference?

Personally id be moving the latest time to abort a long way towards conception from 24 weeks

Decriminalising full term abortions is grotesque, any MP backing it isn’t fit for office. Agreed that 24 weeks feels too late these days too. Ideally you’d want universal early dna screening and bringing the date back, not moving it forwards (or eliminating it).

Is there some massive clamour amongst the public to hugely liberalise abortion? If so I must have missed it. Why on earth are Labour doing this, "decriminalising" full term abortions by doctors is a shocking change. Was it in the manifesto?

This is a government of cranks, traitors and incompetents, all pushing their own crazy theories

One of the few blessings of being British rather than a Yankee is that we don't have their horrible abortion arguments. This risks importing that toxic debate

Why??

Because a number of women were being prosecuted for procuring abortions for themselves during the pandemic & many female MPs were surprised to discover that abortion is still illegal in the UK & that their right to access abortion at all rested on the figleaf of medical need introduced by the Abortion Act 1967.

The expansion of the right to abortion to full-term abortions is separate to this, but it’s unsurprising that some amongst those that believe that access to abortion is a right take an expansive view of that right & are pushing for that.

What about the rights of a nine month old, fully viable fetus/baby, to live - to stay alive - rather than having its brains sucked out of its skull even as it prepares to enter the world?

Head in hands....

Turning to the new prison next to HMP Gartree, I can advise that Ministry of Justice have signed an order with Wates Construction Limited to complete the main works for the new prison, which we expect to be complete by early 2029. You are likely aware that the new prison will be given a new name. We are preparing to launch a consultation with both stakeholders and the local community to find a name for the prison, so that it will have its own clear identity separate to HMP Gartree. I think it is very important that local culture and history is appropriately reflected in the choice of name and that we hear and consult with those living close to the prison on what they would like it to be called.

https://order-order.com/2025/06/17/exc-labour-blocks-plan-to-build-240-places-at-existing-prison/

Its a f##king prison....it should take you 5 minutes to decide on one. Nobody living very close to a new prison will be going well at least they conducted a consultation and went with HMP Rainbow rather HMP Gulag for Slags.

It is all a bit Golgafrinchan isn't it.

People in the MoJ not qualified to discuss the design of the prison or the choice of structure spend weeks deciding what to call it in order to appear busy.