Best Of

I'd say 4, but a more interesting question is what the turnover shows.

How many in, and how many out?

So far it is two out and one in.

And these fuckers want to run the country. There’s a quote about running a bath that comes to mind.

As we say in Yorkshire, this lot couldn't organise a pregnancy on a council estate.

I still the Farage fans still cannot process that one day Rupert Lowe criticises Nigel Farage and the next day he is suspended on what turns out to be spurious grounds.

As I’ve said before. If one person falls out with you, it may be them. If dozens of people fall out with you….

If you meet an arsehole in the morning, you met an arsehole.

If you meet arseholes all day ...

...you're an endoscopist specialising in colonoscopies?

My retired mother-in-law was previously one of Corbyn's greatest supporters and voted Labour in 2017 and 2019.

With Starmer in charge Labour lost her vote, to Reform.

In the event Corbyn creates himself a new party, I have no doubt she will be switching back to Corbyn's new party.

I wonder how common she is amongst the current Reform voters ?

Basically left behind, wanting a massive shake up with very left leaning economic ideas ?

I suspect there may be a rather large cross over between Farage and Corbyn supporters and this new party may have some unexpected results in where they get their voters from.

It's not really that surprising, Corbynites and Fukkers are both essentially yelling 'it's all wrong' while putting up fantasy solutions that sound attractive unless you examine them in depth.

Big day today in the Horizon enquiry when the judge rules on compensation:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g267xe3y6o

Hope @Cyclefree is well enough to watch after all her work on it.

It's just a real shame that it's going to take so long to bring some of the actual criminals involved to justice, as that's a separate report.

Actually, justice will take even longer (first trials c.2028... if there are any).

The second report will talk about blame, but probably no more than that.

I am spending the day in the garden sorting stuff for the shed which I have ordered. It is also a beautiful day.

The second report will not hold people criminally responsible because a public inquiry cannot legally do that. It is one of their failings but it will apportion blame.

In the meanwhile here is my Post Office Bingo Card for you to tick off:

- The human impact was awful.
- It was made worse by the conduct of the Post Office and others, including its lawyers and governments over many years.
- It is still continuing.
- Compensation is due, is urgent, is too slow and the government needs to get a move on because the current situation is disgraceful. 350 of the ca. 900 SPMs affected have died without getting compensation or the return of the money fraudulently taken from them.
- Tribute will be paid to the SPMs.
- The government will welcome the report, say how terrible it all is and pretend that it has no power to do anything about compensation even though the Treasury's dead hands are all over it.
- The Post Office will issue some PR guff about how sorry it is and how much it is doing. Someone will use the appalling phrase "at pace".
- Most journalists will forget to ask why it is that Rodric Williams one of the shiftiest of the PO lawyers who gave evidence and who was heavily involved during the entire period when the problems were known about and covered up is now in charge of compensation at the Post Office.
- The phrase "conflict of interest" will not be mentioned because no-one - other than me - seems to understand or recognise one, even when it is staring you in the face.
- The government continues to think overturning convictions & giving out a few baubles is enough.
- This is how all governments since at least Aberfan have operated. It is Potemkin justice.

Too cynical? Or just realistic? Let's see, shall we.