Best Of
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
Forfar 4:5 East FifeThe only passage I know is Austin 3:16So, one point, why would the EU want us back ?Luke 15:7 applies.
We were hardly model members last time.
Starry
1
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
https://x.com/Nigel_Farage/status/2036127530143334562Such a Drama Queen. Shoe in for Come Dancing after the May elections.
There is now a terror cell in north London.
The fifth column is here.
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
In terms of jewellery I’m not sure I will get this for my wife !!Ladies love a "pearl necklace", or so I am told by men younger than me.
https://x.com/leodavinciwave/status/2035645889759642022?s=61
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
Well if you don’t like it (you know the rest).54% for rejoin is hardly a big margin for rejoining the EU especially with that vote split amongst Labour, the LDs and Greens. The 62% for having a closer relationship with the EU without rejoining it, the Single Market or Customs Union is a more supported position and also hence it is the position of StarmerStarmer has a position? That’s new!
DavidL
1
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
There are numerous regions of Poland now richer than not a few regions of the UK.Both GDP measures I put forward are internationally recognised and valid. GDP per capita PPP in principle compensates for currency volatility and that one has the big gap with the EU2016 is dodgy data because the referendum played havoc with the currency markets in 2016.But there's a disconnect if you say, don't join the EU because of low GDP growth and GDP growth in the EU has been materially faster than the UK over the same period.I said excess, I didn’t say we didn’t have any.Great idea. Need to get a piece of that excess GDPR, over regulation, economic micro management and low GDP growth we are sadly missing out on.And what's our growth been like in the past ten years? Also the last time I looked the UK has GDPR*
* I don't think this is a bad thing, but opinions vary.
Our growth has been moribund so how would joining a trading bloc, with whom we already trade and have an agreement with, turbocharge it ?
* Google AI so perhaps check sources but I get 46% UK versus 63% EU growth GDP 2016 to 2025 current USD and 48% UK versus 86% EU GDP per capita PPP growth over the same period.
Should add UK GDP growth was similar to or better than EU while the UK was a member
Taking a more recent benchmark (eg 2019/2022) or a more distant one, shows that the UK has outgrown the EU per capita.
However Barry likes to explain it away, the last decade has seen remarkable economic growth in Poland.
Meanwhile the regional funding our poorer regions used to receive was not (as was promised) matched by post Brexit governments.
Which cheated many of the areas which voted most heavily for Brexit.
Opinion polling has been very clear for some time. Most of the electorate believe Brexit to be a crock.
Brexiteer cope used to be that there is no majority for rejoin.
Now there seems to be that too, they are struggling to explain it away.
Nigelb
2
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
https://x.com/steven_swinford/status/2036148975011508262Do you want Reform running Manchester as that’s the feared end result
Lisa Nandy tells @elliottengage that Andy Burnham should be allowed to stand for Parliament because he is a 'huge asset to the party'
eek
1
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
OT - Currently Lab do not appear to have a plan. We can argue over whether Rejoining would be a practical plan or not. However, it would be a plan and that would be a major step forward for them.
Frankly anyone who hasn't noticed that getting closer to Europe - notably in defence terms - is an essential to national survival hasn't been paying attention. The old Atlantic alternative is dead and ain't coming back in any reliable form
Frankly anyone who hasn't noticed that getting closer to Europe - notably in defence terms - is an essential to national survival hasn't been paying attention. The old Atlantic alternative is dead and ain't coming back in any reliable form
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
My guess is that 75% of the movement in public opinion on Brexit is nostalgia for the time before Trump, Covid and Ukraine.
Cookie
1
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
You'd need a consistent two thirds polling for Rejoin. Then there's a certain inevitability. It'd be on.
kinabalu
1
Re: Rachel Reeves & Sir Sadiq Khan speak for the nation – politicalbetting.com
Erm, the thread header?Rachel Reeves and Sadiq Khan do NOT speak for me.What are you talking about? When did they ever say they speak for you?
If I .have something to say I will say it myself. I wouldn't trust either of them with anything. Both have no.idea of the truth. Khan is even worse than Reeves if that's possible.
FWIW I have never opposed closer economic links with the EU. At the time we left the EU were as offended as a betrayed spouse and were not willing to offer it. If they have calmed down to the point that they are I would be delighted. We have a lot of mutual interests, probably more since the US went insane.
I would be astonished if this resulted in us rejoining but anything short of that that improves our terms of trade is no problem at all for this leaver.
DavidL
2

