Best Of
Re: Starmer hits a new low – politicalbetting.com
I am remi ded of the old Mike Harding joke that Hitler didn't bomb Wath on Derne because he wanted to be able to see where he had bombed.Putin has Merthyr Tydfil in his cross hairs. Perhaps he has been there and seen the carnage for himself?Neville Chamberlain wanted to destroy Merthyr Tydfil as well.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/2117023/russias-sends-threat-strike-23?utm_source=taboolamktg&utm_medium=taboolamktg_2025&utm_campaign=taboolamtkg_Oct_25&tblci=GiA5eh_L-eo18MVLZHxW15f-AyCs2WGNSflPevsIIJLAgCCanXYouZrDwLnQqp98MKnfQQ#tblciGiA5eh_L-eo18MVLZHxW15f-AyCs2WGNSflPevsIIJLAgCCanXYouZrDwLnQqp98MKnfQQ
So clearly Putin is a technocratic politician of the 1930s with no idea of how to wage a war.
Re: Starmer hits a new low – politicalbetting.com
Russia has more nuclear weapons than any nation on earth. If Russia had no nukes it would likely have been forced out of Ukraine even before Biden left office.Allegedly the aftermath of a Russian attack on the Kyiv Dam this morning.Russia are apparently so weak that some argue they are no threat to Britain and Europe at all, and yet Britain and Europe have been unable - in nearly four years - to provide sufficient support to Ukraine so that they can protect themselves from the threat of a catastrophe that would kill many thousands.
https://x.com/nafovoyager/status/2004909075637977249
Now they were probably looking to take out the power lines rather than the dam itself, but if that dam goes the Ukranian capital gets flooded. Add to the list of Russian war crimes.
There's something missing there.
I fear that Britain is not at all prepared for the destruction that Russia could inflict upon the country, should they so choose.
If Putin floods much of Ukraine that just ensures Zelensky rejects any peace deal
HYUFD
1
Re: Starmer hits a new low – politicalbetting.com
Re your last paragraph I’m sure that was said about Britain at the outset of WW2. I would think it’s very different when you are directly at war as a govt can turn huge parts of the economy and production to war footing which would be unpalatable to the electorate when the war is “far off”.Allegedly the aftermath of a Russian attack on the Kyiv Dam this morning.Russia are apparently so weak that some argue they are no threat to Britain and Europe at all, and yet Britain and Europe have been unable - in nearly four years - to provide sufficient support to Ukraine so that they can protect themselves from the threat of a catastrophe that would kill many thousands.
https://x.com/nafovoyager/status/2004909075637977249
Now they were probably looking to take out the power lines rather than the dam itself, but if that dam goes the Ukranian capital gets flooded. Add to the list of Russian war crimes.
There's something missing there.
I fear that Britain is not at all prepared for the destruction that Russia could inflict upon the country, should they so choose.
I remember asking my grandfather if he was growing up expecting to spend the war flying a B-25 bombing Europe and he said that clearly he didn’t, he never thought about it and him and his brothers expected to go to university, become lawyers etc but when it happened it happened and they had a huge mindset change. He was lucky as was one of his brothers but another died being shot down in Libya.
There is only so much preparation people will take when we have been relatively “safe”.
boulay
1
Re: Starmer hits a new low – politicalbetting.com
Sir Keir must be trying to get a vote of no confidence going
Matthew Doyle: aide given peerage by PM campaigned for paedophile
Spin doctor backed Sean Morton for elected office after he was charged over indecent images of children. No 10 knew — but still approved nomination
https://www.thetimes.com/article/cc18c57b-7852-4e99-a13b-e16ca876af29?shareToken=c927c5bee49dbddb500df52b6b8fc4e0
Matthew Doyle: aide given peerage by PM campaigned for paedophile
Spin doctor backed Sean Morton for elected office after he was charged over indecent images of children. No 10 knew — but still approved nomination
https://www.thetimes.com/article/cc18c57b-7852-4e99-a13b-e16ca876af29?shareToken=c927c5bee49dbddb500df52b6b8fc4e0
isam
1
Re: Starmer hits a new low – politicalbetting.com
aNo. Swansea got through planning in 2 years, with 80-odd% local support.MarqueeMark will be happy with this!The problem is that a project like this will be aggressively opposed by the Enquiry Industrial Complex. Minimum 20 years to get approval.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/dec/27/london-eye-architect-proposes-14-mile-tidal-power-station-off-somerset-coast
The bigger issue is that Minhead was always one of the more complex options. It has not been improved by Hinkley C going for a tidal cooling system of it own, as their "fish scarer" - part of the planning requirement - didn't work.
Plus the stated numbers are notywhere near as good as Cardiff. That would be the sensible first build. All the twiddly bits they are talking about for Minehead that make it more appealling were already incorporated into the Swansea proposal.
Re: Starmer hits a new low – politicalbetting.com
I giggled about that, when I heard.To be fair, those are savvy traders and exactly the sort that you want to keep around…HaDoesn't it really require a knowledge of behaviourism - ie find out what has motivated/motivates humans to make this mess, work out what will motivate them to fix it, and produce the desired political outcomes, and put those systems in place.Have you read Rory Stewart’s autobiography?If I was PM, I'd read Private Eye every fortnight, drag the appropriate ministers and civil servants in, and tell them to f***ing sort it outThe system working as intended then.Good morning and seasons greetings to all.I can't read the article but it seems the premise is that unless conditions are essentially perfect in all regards, with no grounds for appeal, you don't get deported.
Albanian criminal can stay in UK because his partner cannot speak Albanian https://share.google/HNqRcl07p0GsZX1IR
This sort of bollocks decision by the tribunal plays into the hands of those who believe the Human rights act needs reviewing.
The decision isn't just bollocks its effing ludicrous.
Politicians spoute shite about stopping this. They could. They never do.
Or wondered why Starmer complains things can’t get done?
Overcoming systemic culture is hard. It requires knowledge, time and a certain kind of polite savagery.
For a start, there can and should be a permanent system in place that makes civil service and political remuneration dependent on individual and departmental performance, but also on positive markers in the economy.
What if every civil servant was going to get less money in their pay packet and pension pot if GDP per capita went down? How would that affect the efficiency of the immigration system and levels of deportations? How would it affect things like the Chagos giveaway?
I worked in a bank where they tried to change the traders behaviour via the bonus.
So they capped the bonus component for profit and added in a component for growing market share.
The traders took mad risks to maximise profit, then used the “excess” profit to sell derivatives at a loss. So they finished the year with maximum profit bonus and increased bank market share.
Be careful what metrics you use.
You hire people with PhD in maths and greed, then get surprised when they optimise the output of a simple algorithm to maximise their advantage?
Re: Starmer hits a new low – politicalbetting.com
Putin has Merthyr Tydfil in his cross hairs. Perhaps he has been there and seen the carnage for himself?Neville Chamberlain wanted to destroy Merthyr Tydfil as well.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/2117023/russias-sends-threat-strike-23?utm_source=taboolamktg&utm_medium=taboolamktg_2025&utm_campaign=taboolamtkg_Oct_25&tblci=GiA5eh_L-eo18MVLZHxW15f-AyCs2WGNSflPevsIIJLAgCCanXYouZrDwLnQqp98MKnfQQ#tblciGiA5eh_L-eo18MVLZHxW15f-AyCs2WGNSflPevsIIJLAgCCanXYouZrDwLnQqp98MKnfQQ
So clearly Putin is a technocratic politician of the 1930s with no idea of how to wage a war.
ydoethur
1
Re: Starmer hits a new low – politicalbetting.com
I know you’re not a Stan for her or sticking up for her but if she didn’t want to go inside she shouldn’t have pleaded guilty to an offence which as eek, IIRC, explained her sentence was the lowest for that crime and she got the max reduction.Oh dear. The Tories are up to their necks in it too. He actually linked to his twitter feed, so there can be no excuse of ignorance about his social media output.Two things can be true simultaneously:
https://x.com/JamesCleverly/status/1588114772519796736
Last night I spoke to the sisters of @Alaa
We will continue to work tirelessly for his release.
1) Some people are bellends who say disgusting things on Twitter;
2) They can still be wrongfully imprisoned and deserve to be released.
Lucy Connolly can probably explain this better than I can.
Taz
1
Re: Starmer hits a new low – politicalbetting.com
He’s clearly The Archbishop of Banterbury.My Arabic isn’t up to scratch, so can’t be 100% confident of the translation, or context, but…People I worked with who thought they were banter lords were just bullies.Reserve judgementGrok has this to say in response to a question as to whether he would be arrested.
He’s a great guy
Pt. 94
https://x.com/basilthegreat/status/2004940944735695015?s=61
"Based on reports, Alaa Abd El-Fattah arrived in the UK on Dec 26, 2025, without arrest. His 2011-2013 tweets, if genuine, include sarcastic remarks (e.g., with smileys) on racism/privilege, which may not meet UK hate speech thresholds under the Public Order Act (requiring intent to stir hatred). Recent arrests targeted incitement during riots. No ongoing probe reported."
I think Grok is contending that it was possibly all banter. Personally I hate banter.
Banter is just en excuse for being an arsehole or mitigating deeply unpleasant comments.
If,people want to see his comments, and there is a pattern here, as banter. So be it.
Getting this bloke here was one of Sir Keir’s priorities
The sayings of Labour’s favourite Egyptian dissident Alaa Abd El-Fattah in English are terrifying, but here’s what he says in Arabic:
‘If we can't kill the officers anyway ... fine. We'll find a terrorist cell to kill their children and torture their mothers. Peaceful is stupid.’
https://x.com/joerichlaw/status/2004930203202834614?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q
Taz
2
Re: Starmer hits a new low – politicalbetting.com
Robert Jenrick is a great opportunist.
He's not a team player for the Conservative Party, but he does manage to dog whistle those people he wants to trigger. He's certainly managed it on here this afternoon, so I daresay that works for the Daily Mail, Daily Telegraph, GB News and voters that get excited by Jenrick's Islam critical tweets. It is an effective, if cynical strategy. Jenrick is the Chopper Harris of Conservative politics.
He's not a team player for the Conservative Party, but he does manage to dog whistle those people he wants to trigger. He's certainly managed it on here this afternoon, so I daresay that works for the Daily Mail, Daily Telegraph, GB News and voters that get excited by Jenrick's Islam critical tweets. It is an effective, if cynical strategy. Jenrick is the Chopper Harris of Conservative politics.

