Best Of
Re: Why pictures are so important,could Lord Mandelson's underwear cost Lab the Gorton & Denton by-elect
Ok, coming from you that's convinced me. It has to be Rayner. Sorry Wes.Far be it from me to suggest solutions to Labours quandary but Rayner is so far from your desire to beat Reform as you can get. Honestly - Labour supporters and members need to read the fucking room. Your only hope is a Cooper ticket with Streeting as Chancellor maybe. This fascination and love for Rayner is perplexing. She’s clearly thick as shit. And a proven tax dodger.If it helps I'm a Labour member and if/when the vote comes I'll be judging 2 things:The question is, who do we put our money on? Not who would be best, or who would we like, but who will win?Angela Rayner is not the answer to any question relating to the government of this country. Maybe “how can we fuck things up more”.If Angela Rayner is the answer, the wrong question is definitely being asked.“dutifully and perfectly since resignation”.As I posted as the old thread was closing.Rayner is now best-placedWhat about a redhead?First to say I can't see Starmer resigning over this.An atomic bomb wouldn't remove Starmer
I think this all increases the chances of Ange being next.
It makes her financial arrangements seem a bit meh, and allows her to say we've had enough of the old boy's club.
The obvious one is Angela.
She has behaved dutifully and perfectly since resignation.
Labour has a number of very competent ministers in place she would be well advised to keep
Cooper
Mahmood
Healy
McFadden
Both Alexanders
Nandy
Phillipson
Ed M
Emma Reynolds
Jarvis
Some of the new intake.
Likes of Haigh and Thornbury return.
Compares very well with threadbare Shadow Cabinet of failures like Philp, Patel Stride, Atkins, Couthino.
Badenoch probably be gone before Starmer coronation for Cleverly.
Labour edge left.
Tories edge centre.
Has she paid her tax due?
She’s no Mandelson, who can keep coming back again until yet another scandal finally kills her off almost three decades later.
Who would be the better PM?
Who would more likely beat Reform?
Assuming a Streeting v Rayner choice, I'm clear on the answer to the 1st. Streeting. But on the 2nd I'm not sure at all. And if I end up concluding it's Rayner I can see myself (reluctantly) prioritising that and voting for her.
Nothing (for me) is more important than preventing Farage and his gang getting their filthy mitts on this country.
kinabalu
1
Re: Why pictures are so important,could Lord Mandelson's underwear cost Lab the Gorton & Denton by-elect
CNN polling: 71% of Democrats are in favour of voter ID.Everyone in the US has a driving license, except a small number of people in Manhattan/Chicago, and the very old.
https://x.com/jasonjournodc/status/2018700411079626822
rcs1000
1
Re: Why pictures are so important,could Lord Mandelson's underwear cost Lab the Gorton & Denton by-elect
If Labour ditch Starmer they need a street-fighter who can motivate the troops and stick it to Farage. Yvette? Ahem. Nope, it has to be Ange. And they need to move Left - again, to motivate the troops, and unite the left. Make it an existential fight with the Fash.Far be it from me to suggest solutions to Labours quandary but Rayner is so far from your desire to beat Reform as you can get. Honestly - Labour supporters and members need to read the fucking room. Your only hope is a Cooper ticket with Streeting as Chancellor maybe. This fascination and love for Rayner is perplexing. She’s clearly thick as shit. And a proven tax dodger.If it helps I'm a Labour member and if/when the vote comes I'll be judging 2 things:The question is, who do we put our money on? Not who would be best, or who would we like, but who will win?Angela Rayner is not the answer to any question relating to the government of this country. Maybe “how can we fuck things up more”.If Angela Rayner is the answer, the wrong question is definitely being asked.“dutifully and perfectly since resignation”.As I posted as the old thread was closing.Rayner is now best-placedWhat about a redhead?First to say I can't see Starmer resigning over this.An atomic bomb wouldn't remove Starmer
I think this all increases the chances of Ange being next.
It makes her financial arrangements seem a bit meh, and allows her to say we've had enough of the old boy's club.
The obvious one is Angela.
She has behaved dutifully and perfectly since resignation.
Labour has a number of very competent ministers in place she would be well advised to keep
Cooper
Mahmood
Healy
McFadden
Both Alexanders
Nandy
Phillipson
Ed M
Emma Reynolds
Jarvis
Some of the new intake.
Likes of Haigh and Thornbury return.
Compares very well with threadbare Shadow Cabinet of failures like Philp, Patel Stride, Atkins, Couthino.
Badenoch probably be gone before Starmer coronation for Cleverly.
Labour edge left.
Tories edge centre.
Has she paid her tax due?
She’s no Mandelson, who can keep coming back again until yet another scandal finally kills her off almost three decades later.
Who would be the better PM?
Who would more likely beat Reform?
Assuming a Streeting v Rayner choice, I'm clear on the answer to the 1st. Streeting. But on the 2nd I'm not sure at all. And if I end up concluding it's Rayner I can see myself (reluctantly) prioritising that and voting for her.
Nothing (for me) is more important than preventing Farage and his gang getting their filthy mitts on this country.
Be fun to watch.
Re: Why pictures are so important,could Lord Mandelson's underwear cost Lab the Gorton & Denton by-elect
Is Starmer's only defence wilful ignorance?Not so much a defence as a naturally-occurring default state of affairs.
Re: Why pictures are so important,could Lord Mandelson's underwear cost Lab the Gorton & Denton by-elect
I presume that we can assume that the intelligence services knew more about Mandelson than the general public knew when he was appointed AmbassadorIt never passed my desk
What information was given to the Prime Minister that he forensically ignored?
Re: Why pictures are so important,could Lord Mandelson's underwear cost Lab the Gorton & Denton by-elect
There are two ways to boost the birth rate.If you want to boost the birth rate then do it with your wife, not with some random from a bar.Drunken or otherwise, sex is crucial to boost the birth rate. You've got to be in it to win it.Meanwhile, in "weirdly stark juxtaposition" news,If you think it's a lack of drunken sex that's caused the birthrate decline, then it makes a lot of sense.
Reform UK says it would re-impose two-child benefit cap for most families to fund £3bn support package for pubs
https://bsky.app/profile/andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social/post/3mdxlgii4pk2y
Even if you approve of pubs and disapprove of unaffordable children, this seems a tough sell.
One is to restrict women's rights and freedoms and access to education, making them dependent on men in their life.
No-one knows what the second way is yet.
Re: Why pictures are so important,could Lord Mandelson's underwear cost Lab the Gorton & Denton by-elect
You are Ed Balls, and I claim my £5.00.I used to like Yvette. But that permanent scowl is really off-putting.Far be it from me to suggest solutions to Labours quandary but Rayner is so far from your desire to beat Reform as you can get. Honestly - Labour supporters and members need to read the fucking room. Your only hope is a Cooper ticket with Streeting as Chancellor maybe. This fascination and love for Rayner is perplexing. She’s clearly thick as shit. And a proven tax dodger.If it helps I'm a Labour member and if/when the vote comes I'll be judging 2 things:The question is, who do we put our money on? Not who would be best, or who would we like, but who will win?Angela Rayner is not the answer to any question relating to the government of this country. Maybe “how can we fuck things up more”.If Angela Rayner is the answer, the wrong question is definitely being asked.“dutifully and perfectly since resignation”.As I posted as the old thread was closing.Rayner is now best-placedWhat about a redhead?First to say I can't see Starmer resigning over this.An atomic bomb wouldn't remove Starmer
I think this all increases the chances of Ange being next.
It makes her financial arrangements seem a bit meh, and allows her to say we've had enough of the old boy's club.
The obvious one is Angela.
She has behaved dutifully and perfectly since resignation.
Labour has a number of very competent ministers in place she would be well advised to keep
Cooper
Mahmood
Healy
McFadden
Both Alexanders
Nandy
Phillipson
Ed M
Emma Reynolds
Jarvis
Some of the new intake.
Likes of Haigh and Thornbury return.
Compares very well with threadbare Shadow Cabinet of failures like Philp, Patel Stride, Atkins, Couthino.
Badenoch probably be gone before Starmer coronation for Cleverly.
Labour edge left.
Tories edge centre.
Has she paid her tax due?
She’s no Mandelson, who can keep coming back again until yet another scandal finally kills her off almost three decades later.
Who would be the better PM?
Who would more likely beat Reform?
Assuming a Streeting v Rayner choice, I'm clear on the answer to the 1st. Streeting. But on the 2nd I'm not sure at all. And if I end up concluding it's Rayner I can see myself (reluctantly) prioritising that and voting for her.
Nothing (for me) is more important than preventing Farage and his gang getting their filthy mitts on this country.
Re: Why pictures are so important,could Lord Mandelson's underwear cost Lab the Gorton & Denton by-elect
Far be it from me to suggest solutions to Labours quandary but Rayner is so far from your desire to beat Reform as you can get. Honestly - Labour supporters and members need to read the fucking room. Your only hope is a Cooper ticket with Streeting as Chancellor maybe. This fascination and love for Rayner is perplexing. She’s clearly thick as shit. And a proven tax dodger.If it helps I'm a Labour member and if/when the vote comes I'll be judging 2 things:The question is, who do we put our money on? Not who would be best, or who would we like, but who will win?Angela Rayner is not the answer to any question relating to the government of this country. Maybe “how can we fuck things up more”.If Angela Rayner is the answer, the wrong question is definitely being asked.“dutifully and perfectly since resignation”.As I posted as the old thread was closing.Rayner is now best-placedWhat about a redhead?First to say I can't see Starmer resigning over this.An atomic bomb wouldn't remove Starmer
I think this all increases the chances of Ange being next.
It makes her financial arrangements seem a bit meh, and allows her to say we've had enough of the old boy's club.
The obvious one is Angela.
She has behaved dutifully and perfectly since resignation.
Labour has a number of very competent ministers in place she would be well advised to keep
Cooper
Mahmood
Healy
McFadden
Both Alexanders
Nandy
Phillipson
Ed M
Emma Reynolds
Jarvis
Some of the new intake.
Likes of Haigh and Thornbury return.
Compares very well with threadbare Shadow Cabinet of failures like Philp, Patel Stride, Atkins, Couthino.
Badenoch probably be gone before Starmer coronation for Cleverly.
Labour edge left.
Tories edge centre.
Has she paid her tax due?
She’s no Mandelson, who can keep coming back again until yet another scandal finally kills her off almost three decades later.
Who would be the better PM?
Who would more likely beat Reform?
Assuming a Streeting v Rayner choice, I'm clear on the answer to the 1st. Streeting. But on the 2nd I'm not sure at all. And if I end up concluding it's Rayner I can see myself (reluctantly) prioritising that and voting for her.
Nothing (for me) is more important than preventing Farage and his gang getting their filthy mitts on this country.
Re: Why pictures are so important,could Lord Mandelson's underwear cost Lab the Gorton & Denton by-elect
You think Farage doesn't prefer the title Warden of England?Meanwhile, in "weirdly stark juxtaposition" news,Seems like something out of Children of Men. Dystopian future with no children but plenty of pubs - serving gammon, of course.
Reform UK says it would re-impose two-child benefit cap for most families to fund £3bn support package for pubs
https://bsky.app/profile/andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social/post/3mdxlgii4pk2y
Even if you approve of pubs and disapprove of unaffordable children, this seems a tough sell.
All children are unaffordable if you've ever had any.
Re: Why pictures are so important,could Lord Mandelson's underwear cost Lab the Gorton & Denton by-elect
A bar chart from the Whitehouse that the Lib Dem’s would be proud of.
https://x.com/whitehouse/status/2017370992436249025?s=61
https://x.com/whitehouse/status/2017370992436249025?s=61
Taz
3




