Online, probably. They saw lots of bots saying "Russia stronk!", how Ukrainians were Nazis (*), and how Ukraine started the war by not snuggling into the bosom of Mother Russia, and were 'encouraged' to perform this act."Three men found guilty of Wagner-linked arson attack in London"How did these idiots get mixed up with the Wagner Group?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2k37x91vlo
As I’ve said before. If one person falls out with you, it may be them. If dozens of people fall out with you….As we say in Yorkshire, this lot couldn't organise a pregnancy on a council estate.And these fuckers want to run the country. There’s a quote about running a bath that comes to mind.I'd say 4, but a more interesting question is what the turnover shows.So far it is two out and one in.
How many in, and how many out?
I still the Farage fans still cannot process that one day Rupert Lowe criticises Nigel Farage and the next day he is suspended on what turns out to be spurious grounds.
What is McMurdock's Twitter statement meant to mean? Presumably advice he won't reveal and not restoring himself the whip implies he's deep in dogshit? If the advice was "you're innocent", he'd've released it. If he's done nothing to discredit the party, he'd've restored the whip.Reposting fpt:
What is McMurdock's Twitter statement meant to mean? Presumably advice he won't reveal and not restoring himself the whip implies he's deep in dogshit? If the advice was "you're innocent", he'd've released it. If he's done nothing to discredit the party, he'd've restored the whip.But how absolutely stupid to announce that he is leaving the party "in the light of" legal advice.
Does anyone know what happened to @Carnyx ?oh, good question
What is McMurdock's Twitter statement meant to mean? Presumably advice he won't reveal and not restoring himself the whip implies he's deep in dogshit? If the advice was "you're innocent", he'd've released it. If he's done nothing to discredit the party, he'd've restored the whip.Indeed.