Best Of
Re: 39% of Brits are against female equality – politicalbetting.com
I don't get irritated very often but this does irritate me. I was close enough to being among the WASPI cohort to take a great interest in all the publicity. Eventually established that I was the last year-of-birth not affected. So it's crystal clear to me that the publicity was more than adequate and the problem lies with people ignoring what's in front of their faces. The subset of the 41% of people now who haven't heard about them are their latter-day equivalents.As the quip was the other night: what was the point of Burnham announcing he would pay up for the WASPI women as none of them ever follow the news or current affairs? No votes there Mr Madchester.
Re: 39% of Brits are against female equality – politicalbetting.com
I don't get irritated very often but this does irritate me. I was close enough to being among the WASPI cohort to take a great interest in all the publicity. Eventually established that I was the last year-of-birth not affected. So it's crystal clear to me that the publicity was more than adequate and the problem lies with people ignoring what's in front of their faces. The subset of the 41% of people now who haven't heard about them are their latter-day equivalents.
7
Re: 39% of Brits are against female equality – politicalbetting.com
Historians in a hundred years time will struggle to believe the Trump period.I'm struggling now.
Gregory Brew
@gbrew24
This is just how we do diplomacy now, folks.
Trump reposts Araghchi tweet.
https://x.com/gbrew24/status/2065466808396620162
Nigelb
2
Re: 39% of Brits are against female equality – politicalbetting.com
I think you're mixing up two issues.I have no desire to see Loyalist and Republican criminals getting away with murder, but if they promise to never do it again, are as good as their word and several thousands people who would otherwise have died if the sectarian criminals hadn't made that promise live to tell the tail, reluctantly I would live with it.That assumes that prosecuting individuals for "civilian" crimes would lead straight back to war.It's not a particularly rational explanation. Surely the greater good has been achieved through the GFA.Ok. That's a clearer explanation. And the personal axe? Was I right about that?No, the Peace Process *was* a political settlement, in which both sides agreed to use democratic norms to settle differences, by getting elected to an assembly and forming a partnership government.Sure. But my reading of your view based on the many posts we've had on it in the last few days is as follows:It's not bonkers to state that the Community Leaders have been given qualified immunity to Carry On Being Criminal. They have.I know. You keep repeating yourself. But it's still bonkers.I am drawing a line between scum doing racist firebombing in Northern Ireland and scum doing racist firebombing in Manchester.Sorry, but have you gone completely loony? The Peace Process has nothing to do with the firebombing of an imam in Manchester.I still reject the idea that the GFA necessarily includes non-prosecution of criminals for murder, mass drug dealing, bank robberies and arson with side order of racism.So was I. Personally as a regular visitor to the Northern part of the Emerald Isle I wouldn't dick about with the GFA either.I was being sarcastic. The suggestion that the Army shooting at rioters would improve the situation. Or indeed The Peace Process.If my memory serves me, his conclusion as to what constituted a rioter wasn't fantastic, although he turned out to be a brilliant recruiting sergeant for top drawer Nationalist rioters and bone fide terrorists. Is that the sort of experience and quality you had in mind?Someone wanted the army sent in to shoot the rioters yesterday. Is soldier F busy, or can he do consultancy?More Lam:Risked their lives? I guess Soldier F could have got a nasty blister from the amount of rounds he fired on Bloody Sunday.
https://x.com/katie_lam_mp/status/2065397992769671455
Keir Starmer and his Attorney General are still trying to open up prosecutions against Northern Ireland veterans.
Is it any surprise that they're not taking our country's security seriously, when this is how they treat people who've risked their lives to keep us safe?
Which is, apparently, sacred.
That wasn’t what we voted for. The politicians just found peace at any price the easy way forward.
EDIT: note the firebomb attack in Manchester. The Peace Process visiting the mainland?
Monkey see. Monkey do.
Remember all the EDL/BNP/etc efforts to pal up with the Community Leaders in NI?
To the racist scum here, the Peace Process style is what they want. Power for them. on the streets.
It's not bonkers to point out that this now includes ethnic cleansing. It does
It's not bonkers to point out the frequent attempts by the extreme right, in the UK, to join up with the Ulster paramilitaries. See stories in the Guardian and BBC.
If you let the scum be scum, you get scummy behaviour.
The Northern Island peace process, which ended the thirty year orgy of sectarian violence known as the Troubles, was in fact a straight up appeasement of sectarian violence. The persistence of sectarian violence today, albeit at vastly reduced levels, proves this and shows what a big mistake it was.
It's an odd view but clearly a passionate one. I sense there's a personal axe in this for you. Would that be right?
The Men of Violence were persuaded to stop murdering by a combination of force and the offer of jobs.
As the peace process progressed, the MoV pushed against what they saw as annoying things. Like being arrested for entirely civilian crimes.
The response of the Governments in London and Dublin was to give them whatever they wanted. So, after each riot or permeative terroristic attack, the police were pulled back further and investigations were dropped. The alternative was not an instant return to WAR!!!! but some possibility of violence, if the investigations were continued.
This appeasement then created a situation in which the social democratic politicians were seen as increasingly irrelevant, on the streets. So the SDLP gave way to SF and in Unionist politics, the ratchet followed, as the UUP faded, the DUP came in etc etc.
The final result of this ratcheting of the appeasement is that racist firebombing of homes is not a prosecutable crime.
Chasing down evil bastard sectarians of both flavours sadly seems not worth the deaths and maimings resulting in the Europa Hotel continuing to be blown up every few months.
According to that logic, if I want my mainland crime syndicate to be untouched, I should just threaten to bomb the Savoy each year, until the police stop investigating me.
So don't complain about the racist firebombing. Perhaps we should celebrate them?
For The Greater Good.
As part of the GFA, we decided to not to go after the MoV for their former activities, prior to the GFA, in return for them ceasing to be MoV. That was unpalatable, but probably necessary.
What we've also done, in practice, is give the MoV a degree of immunity from investigation for crimes committed post GFA. This is very much not OK, because ultimately it's allowing the MoV to continue to exert control via thier violence. Thus we arrive at the point where we sentence English people who may have posted unkind things about on Twitter about immigrants more harshly than the MoV who have been pulling the strings behind the latest round of burning people out of their houses in Belfast.
(I'm actually in NI this week, I encountered a load of stuff dumped and set on fire at a junction on the A55 in East Belfast on my way through on Tuesday night, which was a bit surreal when you're not used to that sort of thing - presumably in some way connected to the protests).
1
Re: 39% of Brits are against female equality – politicalbetting.com
He was the worst trader.Yes, but when he got back to the hotel he would tell his fellow guests that it was greatest DEAL of all time repeatedly until they wanted to punch him.He'd haggle the price upwards.He’d pay full price, the big twit.Honourable Honest Don is upset by the dishonourable Iranian lies.He's never bought a carpet in a souk, has he?
https://x.com/RonFilipkowski/status/2065430956433981637
Deal again in doubt....
Weak and pathetic.
No one knows carpets better than me.
Nigelb
1
Re: 39% of Brits are against female equality – politicalbetting.com
Peruvian election update - Keiko ahead. By about 600 votesThey might need to add another decimal place.
RobD
3
Re: 39% of Brits are against female equality – politicalbetting.com
He'd haggle the price upwards.He’d pay full price, the big twit.Honourable Honest Don is upset by the dishonourable Iranian lies.He's never bought a carpet in a souk, has he?
https://x.com/RonFilipkowski/status/2065430956433981637
Deal again in doubt....
Nigelb
1
Re: 39% of Brits are against female equality – politicalbetting.com
https://x.com/KarlTurnerMP/status/2065454623897395623
It is quite literally “The thick of it”. This stuff is just too cringe. Stop it please. Stop it.
It is quite literally “The thick of it”. This stuff is just too cringe. Stop it please. Stop it.
Re: 39% of Brits are against female equality – politicalbetting.com
I see it talk Burnham all of 24 hours to roll back on his pledge to give these women money.
It’s free travel now.
Which they get anyway.
What a schmuck
It’s free travel now.
Which they get anyway.
What a schmuck
Taz
2
Re: 39% of Brits are against female equality – politicalbetting.com
Reeves destroyed this government's support within weeks of coming to office.
Luke Tryl
@LukeTryl
I am genuinely interested in the counter factual where winter fuel didn’t happen. Nearly 2 years on it still comes up more often than not in focus groups (and contrary to what some assume just as often from non pensioners) as the moment people lost faith in Starmer and his Govt
Luke Tryl
@LukeTryl
From talking to so many people since the election the consequences of that decision and way it was announced and the amount of good will it eroded I think are outsized - and much more convincing as a narrative of the unravelling of this Government than Britain is ungovernable.
https://x.com/LukeTryl/status/2065142973667443185
Luke Tryl
@LukeTryl
I am genuinely interested in the counter factual where winter fuel didn’t happen. Nearly 2 years on it still comes up more often than not in focus groups (and contrary to what some assume just as often from non pensioners) as the moment people lost faith in Starmer and his Govt
Luke Tryl
@LukeTryl
From talking to so many people since the election the consequences of that decision and way it was announced and the amount of good will it eroded I think are outsized - and much more convincing as a narrative of the unravelling of this Government than Britain is ungovernable.
https://x.com/LukeTryl/status/2065142973667443185


