Interesting. I shot in both Mexico City and Vancover in the same year and they couldn't have been more different. They were both for US products-Pontiac in Mexico City and Maguires in Vancover. I never thought to ask why we were shooting in such odd locations as they were both basically studio shoots.Is this Movie tariff malarkey just another attack on Canada?Vancouver used to be very popular, but I think it is being use less and less these days as it is very expensive in Canada to do anything. Mexico city I believe is now an epicenter for US tv shows. Basically they go where ever the incentives are best. There are some random small cities in Mid West of US that get loads of usage because those states provided big tax breaks and they cheap to operate in.
Aren't a lot of US productions actually shot north of the border?
Over here, we can refer to it as a tax on James Bond.
Some good news for science and research in the UK .Does anyone have a research project into how to run a Government Communications Programme to tell everyone about this, and trumpet it as a success?
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/may/05/british-scientists-eu-horizon-research-funding-programme
Paul Krugman tells the NYT in 1m30s video that it is the uncertainty around tariffs (rather than tariffs themselves) that risks recession:-Uncertainty to a business is far worse than high taxes etc, because you could spend a huge amount of time and effort planning for changes then they get switched up again on you (or you don't know what the change will be, then you are just guessing).
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/uoNzbSTe68M
Glasgow also. One of the biggest was World War Z where Glasgow stood in for Philadelpha, kept the 'extras' community going for weeks.Is this Movie tariff malarkey just another attack on Canada?They shot X-Files in Vancover in what is a pretty good studio complex though not as big as Shepperton or Pinewood and with crews which don't match the English ones (in my opinion). They also use Toronto to double up as Chicago which probably saves them some money. But there again liverpool has also been used as a substitute for Chicago for similar reasons
Aren't a lot of US productions actually shot north of the border?
Over here, we can refer to it as a tax on James Bond.
I'd rather restrict the right than cap. If we have to cap, so be it, but it doesn't feel good. In the event of a genuine humanitarian catastrophe the cap would end up being lifted anyway.In future, we will still admit asylum seekers but we will decide how many, when and from where rather than as now a universal right.The timeline goes something like thisYes, the idea that the nation hasn't continually voted to lower immigration is for the birds. Brexit was a warning shot, I think a Reform majority will be the arrow between the eyes. Labour need to act now or they are staring oblivion in the face as their voters decamp to Reform. I could easily see Reform win a big majority on 35% with Labour down in the mid teens if they don't do anything substantially lower legal immigration and halt illegal immigration and asylum seekers not from Ukraine or Hong Kong, who I think most people agree are welcome.
2004 Blair allows A8 Accession, saying there will only be about 12-13,000 immigrants coming from Eastern Europe
Hundreds of thousands arrive
2010 Cameron says he will get immigration down below 100,000 a year
It goes up to 300,000
2016 Cameron allows a referendum, saying if Leave wins, "No ifs, no buts", we will leave. In parliament he says he will stay and oversee the departure
Leave wins a referendum which will allow us to be fully in control of immigration policy.
Cameron resigns
Politicians start to say that the result was only "advisory"
2017 GE Both major parties pledge to respect the result of the referendum
2017-2019 Labour's Brexit Secretary Starmer does all he can to block the result of the referendum, calling for a second vote. MP's vote down every deal put to them
2019 Boris wins a landslide on a pledge to "Get Brexit Done". Aha! At last, we are in charge of our own destiny, immigration can be reduced to zero if we so desire
Net migration rises to three quarters of a million and we have the crack cocaine of immigration - the small boats
If any of these politicians, none of whom are far right, had kept the promises they made, Farage would have been long retired. Instead he is about a 25% chance to be the next PM, and people who just wanted immigration capped at a level promised by centrists are branded Nazis and fascists.
If someone in real life broke this many promises to someone, then started blaming them and using their platform to belittle and insult them, surely we would think they were the bad guy. So why is it different here?
Is this Movie tariff malarkey just another attack on Canada?They shot X-Files in Vancover in what is a pretty good studio complex though not as big as Shepperton or Pinewood and with crews which don't match the English ones (in my opinion). They also use Toronto to double up as Chicago which probably saves them some money. But there again liverpool has also been used as a substitute for Chicago for similar reasons
Aren't a lot of US productions actually shot north of the border?
Over here, we can refer to it as a tax on James Bond.