Best Of
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
For all the attacks on the Telegraph they seen to have forecast this budget fairly accuratelyI'm astonished. Mea Culpa and all that.
But only because "thats fucking crazy that can't be right" is replaced by "they are fucking crazy"
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
Labour MPs wildly cheering a massively unpopular announcement - which will lose them votes.
6
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
Child benefit cap gone. I think this is the sum total of what this budget is about. Shore up Starmer and Reeves’ position and defer the sensible decisions for another day.For another government.
They've got a working majority of 169 and they're a lame duck government that can't make any sensible decisions.
Pathetic.
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
Regardless of the content, or the voice, given the huge amount of pressure Reeves is under, her delivery was absolutely fine, and surprisingly confident.
Quite impressive under the circumstances.
Quite impressive under the circumstances.
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
Seems like an absolutely awful budget to me.
Not remotely tackled the hard decisions, like combining tax and NI, or reforming property taxes just jacking up a new tax on top.
And for everyone mocking the Telegraph etc for all the reported kites, it seems every awful idea leaked has been approved.
Not remotely tackled the hard decisions, like combining tax and NI, or reforming property taxes just jacking up a new tax on top.
And for everyone mocking the Telegraph etc for all the reported kites, it seems every awful idea leaked has been approved.
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
The Treasury only cares about London because their internal rules on measuring return on investment woefully underestimate the demand for transport. We’ve seen it again and again in recent times - a new transport link finally opens and “surprise!” demand for it turns out to be 5x the original predictions. This persistent error leads them to believe that transport investment only delivers a return in London, and not anywhere else in the country.Be nice if she made some similar commitments outside of London. A brief statement on TRU - which is already happening - and a vague statement of support without commitment on NPR. Not really enough. But maybe there's no room in the speech for detail.Lower Thames Crossing going ahead - let's hope it actually does.I agree. Thamesmead has been snakebit by a lack of rail linkage for decades. Apparently the rail extension is going ahead.
You’d think by now they ought to have noticed that their models are shit - presumably there’s some Treasury-specific ideological reason that prevents them from doing so.
Phil
7
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
The OBR are in serious trouble here .
I know everyone likes to trash the government but this isn’t their error .
I know everyone likes to trash the government but this isn’t their error .
5
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
The grown ups are back in chargeSky reading budget now from the published reportPitifully painfully funny!!! What a shower of idiots!
Shocking leak apparently
isam
5
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
The OBR leak could end up becoming an excuse to sideline or abolish it in future.
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
FPT ref DavidL's comments on juries
1) "pull jurors out of a hat" - my experience is being sorted into groups of 16 at the beginning of the week but it could just be done by computer in a matter of seconds once the juror register is complete
2) Judge briefing the Jury on their duties and responsibilities - apart from case specific issues this is boilerplate. Could be online with a little quiz and declaration, e.g. "If I do my own research on the internet" will I a) be better briefed than the legal counsel, b) be helping my fellow jurors to understand the case or c) do 6 months d) all of the above?
3) Check in advance whether witnesses need screens and prepare. In your cases I assume it's a given, so the screens should be there by default.
None of the above has to be on the critical path.
My experience is that if you're assigned to a trial in the morning then it's 11.30am by the time you're sat down, HHJ does his solemn briefing etc, now 12, they have a brief conflab and decide that there isn't time for 2 opening addresses before lunch, "jury will only remember one side", so break. 2pm before you're back in court in the afternoon, if Judge or barristers don't have an afternoon clash.
There are delays around sending Juries out and reassembling them, but they can just be sent to the next room rather than allowed to disperse.
Juries can be taken off the critical path for most of it. Leveson has just blamed them for the inefficiency of the professionals involved.
1) "pull jurors out of a hat" - my experience is being sorted into groups of 16 at the beginning of the week but it could just be done by computer in a matter of seconds once the juror register is complete
2) Judge briefing the Jury on their duties and responsibilities - apart from case specific issues this is boilerplate. Could be online with a little quiz and declaration, e.g. "If I do my own research on the internet" will I a) be better briefed than the legal counsel, b) be helping my fellow jurors to understand the case or c) do 6 months d) all of the above?
3) Check in advance whether witnesses need screens and prepare. In your cases I assume it's a given, so the screens should be there by default.
None of the above has to be on the critical path.
My experience is that if you're assigned to a trial in the morning then it's 11.30am by the time you're sat down, HHJ does his solemn briefing etc, now 12, they have a brief conflab and decide that there isn't time for 2 opening addresses before lunch, "jury will only remember one side", so break. 2pm before you're back in court in the afternoon, if Judge or barristers don't have an afternoon clash.
There are delays around sending Juries out and reassembling them, but they can just be sent to the next room rather than allowed to disperse.
Juries can be taken off the critical path for most of it. Leveson has just blamed them for the inefficiency of the professionals involved.


