Best Of
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
Is it my turn to be Tory leader yet? I know we all get a go this decade and I’d hate to miss mine. I’ve never been in the Carlton Club.
5
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
The Guardian have noticed Katie Lam.They really should give a tip to @isam who spotted her before anyone else I know.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/04/rise-of-katie-lam-next-tory-leader-migration
MaxPB
5
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
I'm not sure Starmer can lead any initiative for the next 4 years, of any sort. He's held in contempt by almost everyone, so cannot command any following or loyalty. He will remain in office but not in power.It's a bizarre situation for Labour to feel adrift (beyond Spend More) and Starmer to look so lacking in authority after such a landslide victory.
Essentially what that means is he'll run confidence and supply for his own government, despite having a 'landslide' majority.
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
I'm not sure Starmer can lead any initiative for the next 4 years, of any sort. He's held in contempt by almost everyone, so cannot command any following or loyalty. He will remain in office but not in power.
Essentially what that means is he'll run confidence and supply for his own government, despite having a 'landslide' majority.
Essentially what that means is he'll run confidence and supply for his own government, despite having a 'landslide' majority.
Re: Bridget over troubled water for Phillipson – politicalbetting.com
However, I am rather reassured by the fact that right after reading your comment, and other more shrill left or right ones - that the next one in the list was about Airfix kits. Britain will muddle through.I am very worried where this is going and what may followDaily Mail confirms he's an Islamist, and he apparently shouted Allahu Akhbar before the attackOh God. You are going to be insufferably over excited at discovering the petp was an Islamist terrorist. Did it come as a complete surprise to you after seeing the video and photos at lunchtime?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15157191/Suicide-belt-Manchester-attacker-Islamist-terrorist.html
We must grasp the nettle. Voting Reform might not even be enough
We may even find ourselves in a national emergency where all protest marches are banned no matter by whom
This would be extreme but I fear this is a dangerous moment
ohnotnow
5
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
A reminder that Mrs J and I realised that you could replace one word in each of the Harry Potter book titles with the word 'cum' and get some interesting titles. E.g.
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Cum
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Cum
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Cum (or Cum of Azkaban)
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Cum (or Cum of Fire)
Harry Potter and the Cum of the Phoenix (or Order of the Cum)
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Cum
Harry Potter and the Deathly Cum
Yes, we are that immature.
Having said, that, they'd probably make a much better TV series...
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Cum
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Cum
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Cum (or Cum of Azkaban)
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Cum (or Cum of Fire)
Harry Potter and the Cum of the Phoenix (or Order of the Cum)
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Cum
Harry Potter and the Deathly Cum
Yes, we are that immature.
Having said, that, they'd probably make a much better TV series...
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
https://x.com/ulrichspeck/status/1974370920757407767
'The premature recognition of "Palestine" by France and the UK has made Europe even more irrelevant to the conflict than it was already. A joint French-British-German initiative to work with the US and Israel would have brought Europe back in the game.'
'The premature recognition of "Palestine" by France and the UK has made Europe even more irrelevant to the conflict than it was already. A joint French-British-German initiative to work with the US and Israel would have brought Europe back in the game.'
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
I thought the Harry Potter films were awful, because they couldn't fit in all the material required for the overarching plot arc. They end up relying on the viewer knowing the books well enough to fill in the gaps.Harry Potter was a brilliant example of a series, with a great overarching plot arc and story, great characters that grew with the series, and superb world-building. It all generally just works. The films are slightly more uneven, but still excellent.Arcs are good so long as the stories being told are good. Many of the best franchises are good because of good arcs.It is the 21st Century obsession with arcs. It ruined Dr Who; it ruined Star Whatever; it ruined James Bond. Out went the inter-film reset button, to be replaced by the accumulation of in-universe lore over multi-year story arcs until collapsing under the weight of its own internal logic.James Bond: the British owners made a nice mess of the IP themselves to be honest. Escapist entertainment requires the protagonist to escape.I think the Craig films were generally pretty good, and a bit of a change from the paint-by-numbers, repetitive approach that the Brosnan era (and before that, Moore) ended up falling into.
The clear path forward is to make it a period piece. The cars, fashion, music, locations. The main issue bond has had is the big bad in real life is China but they are such a big market for movies they daren’t show that on film.
Their failing was in trying to tie everything together and write an “ending” for the era (modern screenwriters are generally appalling at writing effective and logical endings).
I think it’s probably time that the series did trade on its nostalgia again. A period piece, as you say, would probably work pretty well nowadays.
Star Wars (original trilogy), Back to the Future, Godfather and in recent years Dark Knight and the MCU Infinity Wars.
It needs to be done well. It needs a compelling overarching vision that tends to require someone who understands what they're doing and plans it out well.
Bad storytelling is a failure whether in an individual story or an arc.
The extensions to the universe (in film form) were flops IMV - because they failed in all those areas. Unlike the book series, there was no magic. Having magic in the story does not make the story magic.
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
When I worked in a bookshop, the first two Harry Potter books had just come out and weren't quite the massive phenomenon they became. I recommended them to a mother who wanted something to help a child deal with the loss of a family member. I think the books are great at addressing death and loss for children.Harry Potter was a brilliant example of a series, with a great overarching plot arc and story, great characters that grew with the series, and superb world-building. It all generally just works. The films are slightly more uneven, but still excellent.Arcs are good so long as the stories being told are good. Many of the best franchises are good because of good arcs.It is the 21st Century obsession with arcs. It ruined Dr Who; it ruined Star Whatever; it ruined James Bond. Out went the inter-film reset button, to be replaced by the accumulation of in-universe lore over multi-year story arcs until collapsing under the weight of its own internal logic.James Bond: the British owners made a nice mess of the IP themselves to be honest. Escapist entertainment requires the protagonist to escape.I think the Craig films were generally pretty good, and a bit of a change from the paint-by-numbers, repetitive approach that the Brosnan era (and before that, Moore) ended up falling into.
The clear path forward is to make it a period piece. The cars, fashion, music, locations. The main issue bond has had is the big bad in real life is China but they are such a big market for movies they daren’t show that on film.
Their failing was in trying to tie everything together and write an “ending” for the era (modern screenwriters are generally appalling at writing effective and logical endings).
I think it’s probably time that the series did trade on its nostalgia again. A period piece, as you say, would probably work pretty well nowadays.
Star Wars (original trilogy), Back to the Future, Godfather and in recent years Dark Knight and the MCU Infinity Wars.
It needs to be done well. It needs a compelling overarching vision that tends to require someone who understands what they're doing and plans it out well.
Bad storytelling is a failure whether in an individual story or an arc.
The extensions to the universe (in film form) were flops IMV - because they failed in all those areas. Unlike the book series, there was no magic. Having magic in the story does not make the story magic.
Re: Robert Jenrick, a man of letters? – politicalbetting.com
James Bond is sex, sadism and snobbery, all wrapped up in the Union Jack.That Reacher show, there is absolutely no over the top violence in that, other than perhaps 75% of every single episode.That must be why Amazon refuse to stream any films and series with any gun violence, well apart from the James Bond films they show, and the millions of other films etc where there are guns and shootings.Amazon seem to believe that using pictures of guns in advertising pictures for James Bond would be triggering for folk.And so the enshittification of James Bond has commenced. The government really needs to think about having restrictions on foreign ownership/control of culturally significant property. Amazon are going to take a great franchise and ruin it and ruin it's legacy.What's happened?
Bezos doesn’t strike me as being particularly woke or anything so I’m guessing he will be a bit annoyed at this and get it fixed.
The Americans can do the sex, badly, and definitely the sadism - but they absolutely cannot do the snobbery, or the Britishness.




