Best Of
Re: La Belle Alliance didn’t last very long – politicalbetting.com
PMQs – has Rachel Gilmour ram-raided a jeweller?Welsh posters, calm down, ram raiding means something else in England & Scotland.
Re: La Belle Alliance didn’t last very long – politicalbetting.com
Morning all 
This all reminds me of the days of the Alliance and the notion of "realignment". Back then, the SDP members thought the future was the Alliance replacing Labour as the main challenger to the Conservatives and offering a pragmatic, centrist alternative to what was seen as Thatcherite extremism.
The truth was electoral success was coming FROM the Conservatives rather than Labour so others began to wonder if the aim should be to replace the Conservatives as the challengers to Labour's "leftie" extremism.
As we know, internal contradictions, such as on defence, led to the project failing and ending in acrimony and farce.
Reform may desire to end the Conservatives - they many not find it as easy as they believe. The next election is increasingly looking like Reform vs Not Reform (it should be Labour vs Not Labour but that's where high poll numbers gets you) and ironically it might be Nigel Farage who ends up giving Labour a second term. He might actually prefer that if the price is reducing the Conservatives to a meaningless rump.
As I've said before, BOTH the LDs and Conservatives need to think about positioning as the next GE approaches - the LDs cannot afford to be seen to be too close to Labour and, to be fair, Sir Ed is playing that one well while the Conservatives cannot seen to be too close to Reform and, to be fair, Badenoch and Stride are doing their best on that.
The other point to remember is what parties say before an election and what they do after can be and often is very different. You can say you won't do a deal with the LDs two days before an election (as Cameron did) to maximise your vote but you have to game the scenario in which you have to deal with them (the Conservatives did that and did it well, the LDs didn't and paid the price in the negotiations).
This all reminds me of the days of the Alliance and the notion of "realignment". Back then, the SDP members thought the future was the Alliance replacing Labour as the main challenger to the Conservatives and offering a pragmatic, centrist alternative to what was seen as Thatcherite extremism.
The truth was electoral success was coming FROM the Conservatives rather than Labour so others began to wonder if the aim should be to replace the Conservatives as the challengers to Labour's "leftie" extremism.
As we know, internal contradictions, such as on defence, led to the project failing and ending in acrimony and farce.
Reform may desire to end the Conservatives - they many not find it as easy as they believe. The next election is increasingly looking like Reform vs Not Reform (it should be Labour vs Not Labour but that's where high poll numbers gets you) and ironically it might be Nigel Farage who ends up giving Labour a second term. He might actually prefer that if the price is reducing the Conservatives to a meaningless rump.
As I've said before, BOTH the LDs and Conservatives need to think about positioning as the next GE approaches - the LDs cannot afford to be seen to be too close to Labour and, to be fair, Sir Ed is playing that one well while the Conservatives cannot seen to be too close to Reform and, to be fair, Badenoch and Stride are doing their best on that.
The other point to remember is what parties say before an election and what they do after can be and often is very different. You can say you won't do a deal with the LDs two days before an election (as Cameron did) to maximise your vote but you have to game the scenario in which you have to deal with them (the Conservatives did that and did it well, the LDs didn't and paid the price in the negotiations).
5
Re: La Belle Alliance didn’t last very long – politicalbetting.com
FIFA announce they have asked the Village People, who sing Trump’s adopted anthem YMCA, to perform at the World Cup draw on Friday. (Not a parody tweet).🎶 In the navy,
https://x.com/AdamCrafton_/status/1996045364164788560
where you can commit war crimes 🎶
Re: La Belle Alliance didn’t last very long – politicalbetting.com
Streeting is a top communicator.
“They’ll be few people listening, even to @BBCr4today, who have had a 28% pay rise,” says @wesstreeting correctly berating the BMA.
Accuses BMA of “often behaving like a cartel rather than a trade union.”
https://x.com/lmharpin/status/1996132287000535112
“They’ll be few people listening, even to @BBCr4today, who have had a 28% pay rise,” says @wesstreeting correctly berating the BMA.
Accuses BMA of “often behaving like a cartel rather than a trade union.”
https://x.com/lmharpin/status/1996132287000535112
Re: Compare and contrast – politicalbetting.com
Is Leon due back from his ban yet? It is a bit more boring here without him and he was also one of the few Reform backers on the sitehttps://vf.politicalbetting.com/profile/Leon
Not banned, but maybe just bored of the pile ons
isam
5
Re: The budget: winners and losers – politicalbetting.com
The Online Safety Act and now trials without juries..💩 The authoritarianism just keeps on coming to a degree no-one would thought possible 10 years ago..🧐
Re: Compare and contrast – politicalbetting.com
Rather curious that at a time like this Zelensky has chosen to visit Ireland.You see the Irish have no experience of a neighbour invading and occupying them, if they did they would be more positive to Ukraine.
Where he was welcomed by President Connolly.
Wiki:
"Ideologically left-wing, Connolly describes herself as a socialist and pacifist.[4] A supporter of Irish neutrality, her foreign policy views were described by Politico as "often anti-Western";[5] she is critical of NATO, the European Union's increased military and defence spending and general European militarisation.[6] Connolly has condemned the Russian invasion of Ukraine and has also described NATO's attitude toward Russia as "warmongering".
Fat lot of use she is.
Re: Compare and contrast – politicalbetting.com
...You've used the American spelling of Ed Miliband.That woman is absolutely nailed on to vote Reform. That's exactly what you'd say if you were a Reform voter wanting to be polite to David Milliband, but still felt it was important to register some discontentment out of principle. David Milliband the silly man thinks that's a vote in his box.So with you and LuckyGuy we have potentially half a Reform voter each, so at most rounded up to a single Reform voter the entire threadI did at the last one. Not sure next time, I quite like KemiIs any poster on this thread tonight willing to openly say they will vote Reform at the next GE?This page of comments is certainly not in line with polling. It goes, to the best of my knowledge: Reform, [Reform? I assume], Tory, Tory, Reform, Tory, [?? I’ve no idea what Sunil votes], Tory, Tory, Reform, Lib Dem, Reform, and now Lib Dem.I would say LDs are over represented on here, Tories and Labour and Green and SNP about average represented based on percentage of posters and their voteshare percentage wise UK wide.
Labour, Green, Reform and DNV are probably under-represented on here. Conservative and Lib Dem are over-represented.
I’d guess most here are far less swingy than the average voters.
Reform posters though are seriously under represented given Reform now lead the polls
Aubrey Allegretti
@breeallegretti
Ed Miliband urges Labour MPs to keep the faith:
“Polls are not a forecast they’re a snapshot. If they were a forecast, I’d be currently celebrating my 10th year as prime minister,” he tells the @NewStatesman Christmas reception.
“I was 15 points ahead of David Cameron… Fatalism and pessimism never lifted a single child out of poverty, created a single job or won a single vote for the Labour Party.”
Miliband quotes a woman he met recently, who said she didn’t like Nigel Farage but still warned him: “If you don’t sort it out you’ll get extremism.”
But Miliband strikes a note of optimism: “Reform are incredibly vulnerable and totally beatable. I am absolutely confident we can beat them.”
https://x.com/breeallegretti/status/1995958479891144782
Re: Compare and contrast – politicalbetting.com
Is he not covered in fur?Garfield wasn't bald if the recent tv series is to go by.Mark Kelly is bald. It is generally stated that bald men don't get elected US President.John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Martin Van Buren, James Garfield, and Dwight Eisenhower. All bald.
(I nearly mentioned Gerald Ford too, but swerved just in time, dodging a potentially fatal avalanche of corrections)
Scott_xP
5
Re: Compare and contrast – politicalbetting.com
Trump says he aced a special cognitive test that no other president has done.It's like when he did that jigsaw that said 3-5 years on the box in just a couple of hours...
Foxy
11



