Best Of
Re: Reform or rebrand: Who is really gaining power in local government? – politicalbetting.com
X
Tom Harris 🇬🇧@MrTCHarris
There's a pattern developing here. Announce a radical but unpopular policy, get tons of grief from voters, then once you've been irreparably damaged, perform a U-turn so you get neither the policy nor popularity. Bloody genius.
https://x.com/MrTCHarris/status/1938327501962678304
Tom Harris 🇬🇧@MrTCHarris
There's a pattern developing here. Announce a radical but unpopular policy, get tons of grief from voters, then once you've been irreparably damaged, perform a U-turn so you get neither the policy nor popularity. Bloody genius.
https://x.com/MrTCHarris/status/1938327501962678304
fitalass
5
Re: Your regular reminder that the Tories & Reform are two discrete blocs not one homogenous bloc
Three words.is this a Mayday call?
Sovereign debt crisis.

sarissa
5
Re: Reform or rebrand: Who is really gaining power in local government? – politicalbetting.com
Trump Trade deals deadline may be pushed back.It's Taco Thursday.
I am astonished.
Thank you everyone who has responded for the positive feedback from my header. Been a while since I've done one, glad people found it thought provoking.
Re: Reform or rebrand: Who is really gaining power in local government? – politicalbetting.com
Nice header! Can we get more by this interesting writer?As I think I've said before, @BartholomewRoberts is more measured above the line than below, and better for it. Well done, Barty.
7
Re: Reform or rebrand: Who is really gaining power in local government? – politicalbetting.com
Fair play to him.
Tory MP Takes Swipe At Kemi Badenoch For Attacking Starmer Over PMQs Absence
Mark Pritchard said: "I may get the party whip withdrawn for saying it, but so be it."
A senior Tory MP has taken an astonishing swipe at Kemi Badenoch after she accused Keir Starmer of dodging prime minister’s questions.
The opposition leader said Starmer had “evaded” PMQs for the last two weeks, when he has been attending the G7 and Nato summits abroad.
In response, a clearly-angry PM accused Badenoch of being “unserious” at a time of huge global instability.
He said: “There’s never been a more important time to work with our allies and to be absolutely serious in our response. That response was unserious. Unserious.
“To suggest at a time like this that the prime minister attending the G7 summit and the Nato summit is avoiding PMQs is unserious.”
Later during the same Commons debate, Mark Pritchard, the Conservative MP for The Wrekin, attacked his own leader over her comments.
He said: “Whilst we may disagree on the detail, can I agree with the prime minister that as far as possible in this place, it would be best to keep partisan politics out of national security issues.
“Who knows, I may get the party whip withdrawn for saying it, but so be it. There are things that go beyond party politics.”
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/tory-mp-takes-swipe-at-kemi-badenoch-for-attacking-starmer-over-pmqs-absence_uk_685d30ece4b0c601d5a1eeb7
No wonder Dave (pbuh) thinks Jenrick will do a better job than Kemi.
Tory MP Takes Swipe At Kemi Badenoch For Attacking Starmer Over PMQs Absence
Mark Pritchard said: "I may get the party whip withdrawn for saying it, but so be it."
A senior Tory MP has taken an astonishing swipe at Kemi Badenoch after she accused Keir Starmer of dodging prime minister’s questions.
The opposition leader said Starmer had “evaded” PMQs for the last two weeks, when he has been attending the G7 and Nato summits abroad.
In response, a clearly-angry PM accused Badenoch of being “unserious” at a time of huge global instability.
He said: “There’s never been a more important time to work with our allies and to be absolutely serious in our response. That response was unserious. Unserious.
“To suggest at a time like this that the prime minister attending the G7 summit and the Nato summit is avoiding PMQs is unserious.”
Later during the same Commons debate, Mark Pritchard, the Conservative MP for The Wrekin, attacked his own leader over her comments.
He said: “Whilst we may disagree on the detail, can I agree with the prime minister that as far as possible in this place, it would be best to keep partisan politics out of national security issues.
“Who knows, I may get the party whip withdrawn for saying it, but so be it. There are things that go beyond party politics.”
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/tory-mp-takes-swipe-at-kemi-badenoch-for-attacking-starmer-over-pmqs-absence_uk_685d30ece4b0c601d5a1eeb7
No wonder Dave (pbuh) thinks Jenrick will do a better job than Kemi.
Re: Your regular reminder that the Tories & Reform are two discrete blocs not one homogenous bloc
It’s a bookBook Bannings in Tennessee.What was the problem with the cat book?!
JD Vance is evidently involved; one county - Monroe County - has banned "The Complete Book of Cats" from school libraries. And Calvin and Hobbes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyGA3G9raJI
(This is not new, but I'm just catching up.)
eek
7
Re: Your regular reminder that the Tories & Reform are two discrete blocs not one homogenous bloc
Mr dog makes it to his eighteenth country (Copenhagen for scale) 

IanB2
9
Re: Your regular reminder that the Tories & Reform are two discrete blocs not one homogenous bloc
Here's an idea.
Instead of simply claiming mental health conditions aren't real, how about exerting some effort to explain why the rates are soaring? And make plans to treat and prevent them?
Just a thought.
Instead of simply claiming mental health conditions aren't real, how about exerting some effort to explain why the rates are soaring? And make plans to treat and prevent them?
Just a thought.
Re: Your regular reminder that the Tories & Reform are two discrete blocs not one homogenous bloc
Lol...
https://x.com/ianvisits/status/1938157383626203180
ianVisits
@ianvisits
The only daddy anyone should need.

https://x.com/ianvisits/status/1938157383626203180
ianVisits
@ianvisits
The only daddy anyone should need.

tlg86
5
Re: Your regular reminder that the Tories & Reform are two discrete blocs not one homogenous bloc
Our AI / tech / knowledge economy growth focused government recently cut the extra funding pot that was given to universities to run what are deemed high cost subjects e.g. Chemistry, Medicine, etc. Its crazy, we should be doing the opposite, more money into these subjects.And the first departments to close are expensive laboratory-based sciences like chemistry. It was the same cost-based bean-counting in the 1950s that meant technical schools were never built alongside grammars and secondary moderns. All those workshops!Another day another university set for strike action with belligerent language from the UcU union head.My understanding is that even some very highly ranked universities are under serious financial strain. There is also an issue with funding for PhD, which without those, you don't get post-docs, and the ultimately, you don't get the next generation of academic staff.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8rpkj18xjjo
What a basket case our universities seems to be.
In addition to my bug bear about the unique super computer getting cut, another area not getting enough funding is GPU clusters. Universities will always struggle to compete with these mega tech companies and I don't think they can, but all STEM subjects now need access to GPUs, because ML is such a powerful approach to estimating complex functions from data. Its not just Computer Science with their LLMs, Maths / Physics / Chemistry / Biology / Engineering, they all want to leverage these ML approaches.



