More importantly, who was the great hairy twat of a journalist that queried Zelensky's attire?Suits are stupid anyway. Expensive, high maintenance, usually uncomfortable and not even particularly pleasing aethestically. I've never understood the rule that says the more impractical your clothes, the better the work you do or the more respect you show people you meet.
"Why aren't you wearing a suit"?
I mean, really? Really? Zelensky is a war leader, they often wear combats and the like to express that status, and fair play, it's not like Zelensky is lying. He was in Kyiv as the bombs fell and as the Russians tried to hunt him down and kill him
It's that ignorant and insulting question that introduces the first discordant note and changes the mood, and you can see how it riles Zelensky (and I don't blame him) - he mentions it several times later (before the Goodfellas out-take)
Starmer is all in.I am going to stick my neck out and say that he will honour his pledge. I don't like Starmer or his politics but I think he has a brain and he also has a moral code. I am going to do something very rare and trust him to be doing the right thing for the right reasons.
No way to back out of this now.
He'll have to resign if he ends up somehow having to dump Zelensky for Trump's Putinist USA.
These are the highest of stakes a PM gets to play.
UK Prime Minister
@10DowningStreet
The UK will stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes.
https://x.com/10DowningStreet/status/1895950498576154630
They are never going to cope when China eclipses them, and that will happen, and sooner now due to their actions."We run the world. This is America's world. It’s our proxy. It will end when we say it's over," — Fox News host Jesse Watters on Ukraine and President Zelensky.They really are quite insane.
https://x.com/NOELreports/status/1895762952516735196
An unremarked point in all this is that the UK has got this premier role in global politics at the moment because of Brexit. The UK sitting outside the EU is allowing for the EU to be sidelined in all of this. Were we still EU members and all other things being equal, there would be absolutely huge pressure on the PM and Macron to coordinate everything through some EU based response which would make it all watered down and worthless. By virtue of not being in the EU the UK has allowed France to also sidestep needing to corral 27 countries into a unified response. As it stands the UK is working directly with France as the other recognised European nuclear abs military power and there's no pressure on either party to consult with Von der Layen and all of the other useless EU commissioners.I've agreed with most of your comments over the last few days. But I don't believe for a moment that Macron (or Starmer, for that matter) would have behaved any differently if the UK were still in the EU. Since 1973, there have been a multitude of instances where Britain and France have taken foreign policy stances independently of any collective view of the EU.
Not only is this a tangible Brexit benefit, it's actually a very substantial one. The landscape would be totally different inside the EU and I think significantly more difficult to Trump back in the room.
I have to mea culpa on this. I was very pissed off by what looked like a typical fawning performance by a PM in Washington on Thursday, and then a worrying silence yesterday after the ambush. But it does seem Starmer and his advisers knew what they were doing.https://x.com/peston/status/1895944876040339678Credit where it is due
The prime minister has spoken to President Zelenskyy, and President Trump and President Macron this evening, with the intent of bridging the rift between Zelenskyy and Trump