Best Of
Re: Two NYC bets you should be making – politicalbetting.com
I don't want to sound callous, but if you've just had some 'personal news'/issues, then WTF are you doing sitting on the benches in PMQs in front of the cameras? Just head off to your office.
Re: Two NYC bets you should be making – politicalbetting.com
I don't normally watch PMQs. It's a bit of a pointless circus. Taking a look now.
1) I'd forgotten how much I enjoy Lindsay Hoyle. He's the best speaker we've had since Betty. He also has the best voice ever.
2) I'd forgotten how asinine the whole process is. Stop cheering, everyone.
3) Shut up about football, Keir. You can get away with a single mention of the NHS.
4) Kemi's being a bit oily. And that first question should just have been the last sentence. I actually used to quite like Corbyn's relatively simple approach to PMQs, albeit that his questions were a bit scattergun.
5) Kemi's clearly winning now. She has an odd way of pronouncing the word 'alone'.
6) SKS looking a bit rattled now. Rayner looking furious all the time.
7) Actually, this is really good by Kemi. Starmer not putting up a bad fight though - the Lab approach of Lab-does-x-repeat sounds more convincing and less robotic coming out of his mouth than it does out of Rachel Reeves.
... that was quite good actually I take back some of point 2. Reeves looking a bit hangdog but no tears yet. Let's scan forward a bit...
8) Here's some fella from Glasgow asking a very bland question about rail staff which SKS answers earnestly. The Reeves bottom lip is definitely quivering now. Why now? Scanning back and forwards she seemed ok before this?
9) Harriet Cross, Gordon and Buchan. I hadn't heard of her before. She's quite good, albeit on a subject I am unconvinced by. Reeves cheered herself up a little now, though her face is still at no happier than 2/10. What's she doing with her tongue?
10) Clearly wiping away tears now.
...but not really clear why? It didn't appear to be in response to anything in particular that happened in the chamber.
1) I'd forgotten how much I enjoy Lindsay Hoyle. He's the best speaker we've had since Betty. He also has the best voice ever.
2) I'd forgotten how asinine the whole process is. Stop cheering, everyone.
3) Shut up about football, Keir. You can get away with a single mention of the NHS.
4) Kemi's being a bit oily. And that first question should just have been the last sentence. I actually used to quite like Corbyn's relatively simple approach to PMQs, albeit that his questions were a bit scattergun.
5) Kemi's clearly winning now. She has an odd way of pronouncing the word 'alone'.
6) SKS looking a bit rattled now. Rayner looking furious all the time.
7) Actually, this is really good by Kemi. Starmer not putting up a bad fight though - the Lab approach of Lab-does-x-repeat sounds more convincing and less robotic coming out of his mouth than it does out of Rachel Reeves.
... that was quite good actually I take back some of point 2. Reeves looking a bit hangdog but no tears yet. Let's scan forward a bit...
8) Here's some fella from Glasgow asking a very bland question about rail staff which SKS answers earnestly. The Reeves bottom lip is definitely quivering now. Why now? Scanning back and forwards she seemed ok before this?
9) Harriet Cross, Gordon and Buchan. I hadn't heard of her before. She's quite good, albeit on a subject I am unconvinced by. Reeves cheered herself up a little now, though her face is still at no happier than 2/10. What's she doing with her tongue?
10) Clearly wiping away tears now.
...but not really clear why? It didn't appear to be in response to anything in particular that happened in the chamber.
Cookie
6
Re: Two NYC bets you should be making – politicalbetting.com
.I was once kept under for more than a week in ICU when I had an awful bug that had thrown my diabetic control off, and they could not find out what it was for some time. When I resurfaced I had a very bizarre collection of memories some of which I could not tell apart from actual events for some time.I think dying will be just like going under anaesthetic. I've been under a couple of times and you don't remember much about the before, and wake up with a blank mind after, with no remembered dreams or thoughts. So I reckon death is just a lights out moment. The switch gets flicked and you're done and dusted. No after life, no soul drifting up to see the bearded old white fella or being dragged down for a rave in Satan's gaff.My anaesthetist was a bit mad. "You're young and fit so I'll be extra disappointed if you die", as he hands me a leaflet explaining that they don't really know why the drugs work in the first place.You would think that people wouldn't want to work with people who go around killing patients.No but sadly I think the Letby case means fewer nurses will want to work in premature baby units even if they would want to do so for the best of motivesIf you want true cost efficiency, end all treatment for premature babies.Fully agree- and even if it isn't be most cost-efficient thing to do, providing clear closure to grieving relatives is the sort of thing that civilised places do.What about the parents of other children who may have been murdered?Which has already been done given Letby has been convicted and got a whole life order (assuming the verdict was correct and truthers wrong).The purpose of criminal convictions, in general includeThoughts and prayers for the Letby truthers.What a complete waste of taxpayers money and CPS time, Letby is serving several whole life terms, what do the CPS want a judge to do, sentence a reinacarnated Letby to a new term after her death? That is assuming she is guilty of course whatever the Letby truthers say
CPS considering further criminal charges against Lucy Letby
Detectives have handed over evidence related to the death and collapse of other babies at hospitals where she worked
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/lucy-letby-charges-cps-n6n7g2z5c
- Closure for the victims and then family of victims
- Public statement of what happened
- Publicly assigning responsibility to the criminal
- Recognition that a crime was committed and could possibly have been stopped.
In addition, here, sorting out deaths caused by ill intent from those caused by negligence has value.
The CPS are just wasting taxpayers money trying to bring more charges against her which could go on convicting criminals who are not already in jail for the rest of their lives
Justice isnt just locking up the guilty.
But maximising the function "bad guys locked up per taxpayer dollar" is one of those ghastly Americanisms that the British right are increasingly thirsty for.
Aside from the medical and lifetime costs, think of the savings on trials and negligence cases.
#Aktion4U
Yet hospitals seem to have no problems getting people to work with anaesthatists.
Cancel all religions, I've solved it, and it ain't 42.
For some I had to sit down with a counsellor and work out "did this happen?" to avoid letting them persist, as it would have made some personal and family relationships difficult.
We ended up with "assume these things did not happen" until or unless there is evidence to the contrary.
A strange experience.
MattW
6
Re: Two NYC bets you should be making – politicalbetting.com
“You’ve got your assisted death. That’s safe.”Isn’t this Bullseye’s /Jim Bowen’s “Look at what you could have won” - as they reveal this week it was the once a month car prize rather than the speedboatLOOK AT WHAT YOU MADE ME NOT DO! ShurelyLOOK AT WHAT YOU MADE ME DO!
Alex Wickham
@alexwickham
Senior govt sources saying this morning that by forcing the govt to abandon its welfare reforms Labour MPs have likely killed off any hope of lifting the two child benefit cap
One says that’s a great shame for the govt’s child poverty ambitions. Starmer had wanted to lift it
https://x.com/alexwickham/status/1940331679102706001
Re: Two NYC bets you should be making – politicalbetting.com
Tears, Sarah-JaneOn a human level, leaving aside the politics, I hope she is OK.
‘A tear just rolled down the Chancellor’s cheek at #PMQs as the PM refuses to answer whether or not she’ll stay in her job.
Hayfever, or something else?’
https://x.com/paulbranditv/status/1940369217574101264?s=61
Re: Two NYC bets you should be making – politicalbetting.com
Prescient from Michael Crick, 22nd June 2024
In two to three years time, when Starmer and his government are no doubt deeply unpopular, I hope we in the media will ask ourselves: "Why were we so supine during the long 2024 election; why didn't we hold Labour properly to account while we could, and ask more probing questions, and explore their records, rather than give them such an easy ride?".
https://x.com/michaellcrick/status/1804622969500516439?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q
In two to three years time, when Starmer and his government are no doubt deeply unpopular, I hope we in the media will ask ourselves: "Why were we so supine during the long 2024 election; why didn't we hold Labour properly to account while we could, and ask more probing questions, and explore their records, rather than give them such an easy ride?".
https://x.com/michaellcrick/status/1804622969500516439?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q
isam
10
Re: Two NYC bets you should be making – politicalbetting.com
All that tells me is that Starmer and co should have been a lot clearer in what the trade offs were.
Alex Wickham
@alexwickham
Senior govt sources saying this morning that by forcing the govt to abandon its welfare reforms Labour MPs have likely killed off any hope of lifting the two child benefit cap
One says that’s a great shame for the govt’s child poverty ambitions. Starmer had wanted to lift it
https://x.com/alexwickham/status/1940331679102706001
They really are both crap and politics, and crap at communicating the issues and trade offs involved
eek
5
Re: Two NYC bets you should be making – politicalbetting.com
Yes, these are all human beings at the end of the day.Tears, Sarah-JaneOn a human level, leaving aside the politics, I hope she is OK.
‘A tear just rolled down the Chancellor’s cheek at #PMQs as the PM refuses to answer whether or not she’ll stay in her job.
Hayfever, or something else?’
https://x.com/paulbranditv/status/1940369217574101264?s=61
I don’t rate her as a chancellor but, as with any MP of whatever colour, I don’t wish her personally any ill.
Too many people, especially on the extreme left and right, get very personal and start wishing people ill.
It ends up with Jo Cox and David Amess, it starts with calling your political opponents scum or worse.
Taz
8
Re: Two NYC bets you should be making – politicalbetting.com
On the discussion, yesterday, about A/C
- opening the window at 30c+ does next to nothing.
- Natural ventilation can help, but can’t go all the way.
- Increasing numbers of deaths are associated with heatwaves.
- The American movie style of air conditioning, the rattling, roaring box badly attached to your window, is ancient history.
- Even a small amount of solar can run the A/C for a whole house.
- opening the window at 30c+ does next to nothing.
- Natural ventilation can help, but can’t go all the way.
- Increasing numbers of deaths are associated with heatwaves.
- The American movie style of air conditioning, the rattling, roaring box badly attached to your window, is ancient history.
- Even a small amount of solar can run the A/C for a whole house.
Re: Two NYC bets you should be making – politicalbetting.com
Photo of the day - Clouded Magpie moth, from my Devon garden last night.


11


