Starmer's just given a good argument for why he should go immediately: "Every minute we spend not talking about [list of Labour's priorities] is a wasted minute." (View Post)

Why can he not admit that this was the basis on which he appointed Mandelson and instead has to construct an obviously fictitious narrative that makes him the victim? (View Post)

Starmer: "I had no reason at the time to know they were lies." That's just not credible and if his defence is that he was too naive then he shouldn't be in the job anyway. (View Post)

The new line is less credible than the old line. (View Post)

If she puts someone credible into Number 11 and leaves them to get on with it then she can avoid that fate, but it depends how radical she wants to be. (View Post)