tlg86
-
Re: The concerns of LAB voters compared with CON ones – politicalbetting.com
I don’t know for sure, but I think you’re wrong about this. I think the decision process is: Is the ball in play? Yes, then it’s out. Was the dismissal effected by the keeper? Yes Was the batsman att… (View Post)1 -
Re: The concerns of LAB voters compared with CON ones – politicalbetting.com
No one is arguing about whether it was out or not. It's whether it's fair dinkum to do that to an opponent. If it is, then all's fair. (View Post)1 -
Re: The concerns of LAB voters compared with CON ones – politicalbetting.com
Bairstow will be tempted to chuck the ball at the stumps after every ball in the next test. It will become tedious, but very much within the laws of the game. (View Post)2 -
Re: The concerns of LAB voters compared with CON ones – politicalbetting.com
Only because Bairstow had taken the time to mark his spot to indicate he considered it to be dead ball. The umpires were on the move too. Balbirnie wasn't in his crease, which is kind of the poi… (View Post)1 -
Re: Are the SNP too wee, too poor, too stupid to fight an election? – politicalbetting.com
Well that’s a ridiculous decision. Stumped with the keeper standing back is a joke. (View Post)1
