tlg86
-
Re: Hunt takes clear lead in the next CON leader betting – politicalbetting.com
But as @ydoethur has pointed out, the Tories didn't need a deal with the Lib Dems. They just needed the Lib Dems to abstain. That wasn't the case for Labour. They needed everyone bar the To… (View Post)2 -
Re: Hunt takes clear lead in the next CON leader betting – politicalbetting.com
The difference is that in 1974, the incumbent was looking to do a deal. That wasn't the case in 2010. The incumbent should have accepted that the game was up as soon the results were in. (View Post)2 -
Re: Hunt takes clear lead in the next CON leader betting – politicalbetting.com
Yep, go to 2:26:00: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rQELMwCVW4 (View Post)1 -
Re: Hunt takes clear lead in the next CON leader betting – politicalbetting.com
But he didn't need to resign. Labour weren't in a much different position to govern. (View Post)1 -
Re: Hunt takes clear lead in the next CON leader betting – politicalbetting.com
Unless they bought those fake tickets from Liverpool or UEFA, they are not victims, they are perpetrators. (View Post)2
