stodge
-
Re: Analysing yesterday’s by-elections – politicalbetting.com
NIMBYs are generally not wholly anti-development. The real problem is or are the developers who have effectively rationed the amount of land available for development and build houses not to solve th… (View Post)3 -
Re: Analysing yesterday’s by-elections – politicalbetting.com
Evening all :) More than a few signs of desperation from the anti-Labour side on here. Oddly enough, I got the two results the wrong way round. The Conservatives lost 40% of their 2019 vote in Kingsw… (View Post)2 -
Re: Analysing yesterday’s by-elections – politicalbetting.com
You can derive whatever comfort you like from the assertion the sheer number of Labour votes cast doesn't mean they won convincingly or the assertion all the voters who stayed at home were basic… (View Post)1 -
Re: Beware the Bookie rules before betting on a GE2024 overall majority – politicalbetting.com
Yes, I mused on this a couple of nights ago on here. Back in 1996-97, the general mood of enthusiasm for Blair was predicated on the fact he wouldn't change things too much. There would be no tu… (View Post)3 -
Re: Beware the Bookie rules before betting on a GE2024 overall majority – politicalbetting.com
With respect, why do you even care? I'm more concerned about the £6.3 million it's costing than the names themselves which are frankly neither here nor there. The "official" names… (View Post)1