rcs1000
-
Re: The latest White House 2028 betting – politicalbetting.com
@Leon There's another major statistical thing that you also need to consider. If someone previously tested the hypothesis, and got a negative result, then will will rush to reproduce it, because… (View Post)3 -
Re: The latest White House 2028 betting – politicalbetting.com
That's not a crisis: that's science working as it should. https://xkcd.com/882/ If people published negative results, then we wouldn't have this issue, because people would know that t… (View Post)3 -
Re: Saying no to Boris Johnson – politicalbetting.com
Yes: the cost of LiDAR is collapsing. When Tesla decided not to go that route, it seemed sensible, because LiDAR added $10,000 to the cost of a vehicle. Now, $30,000 Chinese vehicles include multiple… (View Post)1 -
Re: Saying no to Boris Johnson – politicalbetting.com
Tesla's FSD in the US is incredibly impressive. I mean staggeringly impressive. You enter a destination, you hit go, and then you hand off control to FSD. And 90% of the time, your car will do a… (View Post)1 -
Re: Saying no to Boris Johnson – politicalbetting.com
People accept that humans make mistakes: they are much less forgiving of machines. (View Post)3
