rcs1000
-
Re: In office but not in power – politicalbetting.com
Errr no. DOGE said it would cut $2 trilliion per year from the annual budget. They have cut $180bn in total spending - but some of the savings are years in the future. They've maybe cut $50bn fr… (View Post)1 -
Re: By-election betting – politicalbetting.com
Wait. Me suggesting houses for millionaires is "just an agenda for left liberalism"? That's... interesting... (View Post)1 -
Re: By-election betting – politicalbetting.com
It doesn't matter if the average family buys it or not, because it means a well off family buys it, which means that they don't buy a home that a slightly less well off family would buy, et… (View Post)2 -
Re: By-election betting – politicalbetting.com
Ummm: that's precisely my point. That widow is using a large house that a family could be using. We'd be (gently) incentivizing her to switch via the tax system. How about we do a deal: no … (View Post)4 -
Re: By-election betting – politicalbetting.com
At the margin, a wealth tax (which would probably end up being levied principally on property) - while giving @HYUFD an aneurism - would almost certainly be mildly positive. If government must raise … (View Post)5
