pm215
-
Re: LAB fancied to make more by-election gains in the Feb 15th contests – politicalbetting.com
Yes, there are a lot of companies and organisations that got used to using it as a handy broadcast mechanism, and often embedded the tweets on their website somewhere, and that kind of use has basica… (View Post)1 -
Re: Upending assumptions – politicalbetting.com
If you don't have efficiency regs then the builders build cheap houses with lousy insulation which cost a fortune to heat in winter and overheat in summer. Which is differently cheap and nasty, not a… (View Post)1 -
Re: Upending assumptions – politicalbetting.com
The problem is not "houses should be energy efficient", though -- the problem is we let builders get away with satisfying the regs with the absolute cheapest and nastiest possible design. Y… (View Post)4 -
Re: Trump could be in political trouble if found guilty – politicalbetting.com
As I've said before, I'm pretty sceptical about taking this polling at anywhere near face value. I think there's a sizeable group of voters who will tell you today "if Trump is found guilty I wo… (View Post)9 -
Re: LAB reaches new high in general election betting – politicalbetting.com
I agree that the ceremony matters for the royals, but we don't have a royal family because we have a "logical justification" for it, let alone the logic being the religious angle. If you wa… (View Post)2