pm215
-
Re: Sharp movement to Jenrick after yesterday’s vote – politicalbetting.com
Don't you implicitly have to assume *some* figure, though? If you do nothing, that implicitly says "conventions have no effect on polling, there is no bounce effect", and when the poll… (View Post)1 -
Re: So, it begins – politicalbetting.com
The rail travel one in particular is weird -- you can get a railcard for 30% off if you're under 30, or over 60, or a veteran, or disabled, or you travel with another person, or you travel in th… (View Post)2 -
Re: They aren’t all the same – politicalbetting.com
Whatever the rights and wrongs of this specific question, I think it's clearly wrong to require that something has happened before for it to be a "clear risk". It's essentially a … (View Post)1 -
Re: The pollsters could be missing a Harris surge – politicalbetting.com
In general I agree, but traditionally forums have also provided paging and/or some other way to immediately go to the most recent comments. The Vanilla view embedded in the PB website has neither, so… (View Post)1 -
Re: Will the weirdo cat hater be gone soon? – politicalbetting.com
The random damage vandals might do almost certainly massively outweighs the tiny amount of cash that might accumulate in the cash box over the course of a week for an average unsupervised church. For… (View Post)2
