pm215
-
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
We passed the Automated Vehicles Act last year; oddly enough it wasn't a blanket ban... It does include various provisions relating to liability for accidents (which I have not attempted to read) and… (View Post)1 -
Re: Despite all the fury fewer than a third oppose the Chagos Islands deal – politicalbetting.com
Well, that's why I dislike PFI: not because it was bad in itself or the worst option the government could have chosen, but because it is a symptom of a failure. If you find yourself doing something t… (View Post)2 -
Re: Why Starmer’s pivot might actually lose him votes not gain them – politicalbetting.com
The thread header reminds me that I had a genuine question: to what extent do we need (or want) some level of immigration to balance out our current demographic curve, i.e. to increase the number of … (View Post)2 -
Re: Why Starmer’s pivot might actually lose him votes not gain them – politicalbetting.com
If you look at the things that RochdalePioneers is suggesting as investment, though, the common theme is that they are largely investments that allow the private sector to flourish, not ones made to … (View Post)4 -
Re: Wise words from a pollster – politicalbetting.com
I read that as listing "private polling that doesn't exist because it's actually numbers pulled out of somebody's arse for political purposes masquerading as a private poll" as opposed to &… (View Post)1
