nova
-
Re: Undefined discussion subject.
I specifically said that 50% wasn't a baseline - agreeing that was ridiculous. You did however say that the honeymoon wasn't over, but in the very next post you're talking about "after their hon… (View Post)1 -
Re: Undefined discussion subject.
Since they had a 20-25% lead just a few months ago. It's all relative. If there was an election tomorrow, then they might be happy, but instead it's honeymoon over, and heading for a major recession,… (View Post)1 -
Re: Undefined discussion subject.
The Lib Dem vote is almost exactly the same as it was in the month before Starmer took over - when the Tories had leads of over 20%. So, clearly a "swing from Lib Dems to Labour" isn't what… (View Post)2 -
Re: politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Some assorted Presidential election betting markets
It's high for a reason - looks plausible, and is the kind of odds that bookies like to stick in the windows before a match, but would be pretty unusual. Man City have played 56 games this season, and… (View Post)2 -
Re: politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Trump voters maybe far more enthusiastic about their man than
All too common. I used to work in the voluntary sector, so recruitment had to follow strict policies, and I always encouraged feedback. On a few occasions I'd have loved to pass on info about really … (View Post)1