mwadams
-
Re: Whilst CON MPs don’t decide who leads they can sack the winner – politicalbetting.com
Ahead of Truman [re-elected] and Reagan [re-elected], ever so slightly behind Trump [not re-elected], Clinton [re-elected] and Carter [not re-elected]. A little further behind Obama [re-elected] and … (View Post)1 -
Re: Whilst CON MPs don’t decide who leads they can sack the winner – politicalbetting.com
Especially now we know that the environmental damage for flying is a multiple worse than we believed (due to the formation of contrails which actually dominate the calculated carbon cost of the fuel … (View Post)2 -
Re: Minding Our Manners – politicalbetting.com
It is, however, a *great* example of something that the observer *can* take to be offensive, or not. Which is independent of whether the artist intends offence. And this is the pickle that people get… (View Post)2 -
Re: The Saturday open thread – politicalbetting.com
Let's say they are travelling at 0.125 light speed, they have light speed communications, and that was a vessel out looking for civilisations to conquer. They found us 32 years ago. It took 4 ye… (View Post)1 -
Re: The latest polling is giving us widely different numbers – politicalbetting.com
Also - if they keep claiming to have destroyed more and more HIMARS systems, and yet they keep coming, the troops are going to think there's an inexhaustible supply. (View Post)1
