mwadams
-
Re: Meeks and Rentoul argue over Davey’s “No deals with CON” – politicalbetting.com
I think it is *essential* that the LDs position themselves in such a way that Labour voters can hold their nose and vote for them in LD/Con marginals. Which are *all* of the LDs targets. (Apart from … (View Post)4 -
Re: Was the CONHome members’ survey the driver of the re-shuffle? – politicalbetting.com
This is reminiscent of the right-wing antivaxxers on US TV v. right-wing antivaxxers on US Radio. The former have all got vaxxed and are just spouting bullshit to the detriment of others; the latter … (View Post)1 -
Re: Was the CONHome members’ survey the driver of the re-shuffle? – politicalbetting.com
(My reasoning - I like the 7/1 for party leader better than the 12/1 for next PM, as there are more, and very plausible, electoral scenarios where she becomes leader but not PM) (View Post)1 -
Re: Was the CONHome members’ survey the driver of the re-shuffle? – politicalbetting.com
I have a little on Liz Truss @ 10/1 for next Conservative leader. She's 7/1 on Ladbrokes right now, with Gove at 6/1 and Sunak on 9/4. I think Gove has way less chance that that, and Truss is st… (View Post)1 -
Re: Could Raab be in trouble at Esher and Walton? – politicalbetting.com
There's also the separate question of LD defence of the 4 marginals in Scotland. That should not be taken lightly. (View Post)1
