mwadams
-
Re: Defining legacies – politicalbetting.com
The 44-46% is quite surprising (though I can see the logic). But the range 38%-43.99% is only 6pp and roughly MOE territory for the central point of 41% (which matches current poll averages, IIRC). (View Post)1 -
Re: Defining legacies – politicalbetting.com
He looks a lot less like Genial Harry Grout than usual. (View Post)1 -
Re: Defining legacies – politicalbetting.com
Behind which almost all of us can coalesce. (View Post)3 -
Re: Defining legacies – politicalbetting.com
That is precisely the difference between a broadcaster's vox pops (people prepared to talk to a journo on camera) v. a statistically sound polling methodology. It's not the polling that is … (View Post)2 -
Re: Defining legacies – politicalbetting.com
"Ridiculous" or not, it is something that has struck a chord with people (which is why the media worries it to death). I think it is because 1) Sunak was supposed to be representing us all,… (View Post)2
