Sensible Democrat talking heads have been debunking this. It was quite plain he was commenting that she was a chip off the old block and would be less hawkish if she was the one facing the barrels. N… (View Post)

Who the hell knows. They are two very strange candidacies without much modern precedent. One a “defeated incumbent”, the other an incumbent with a previously low profile chosen with no primaries. (View Post)

Early morning typo alert! Az, Nevada and NM obvs :-) (View Post)

Equally judging from latest polls, I think it’s highly plausible that Kamala takes Wisconsin, Michegan and Pa. And trump N carolina, Nv, Az and Georgia. And we finish 270-268 in her favour (View Post)

There is another interpretation. That he thinks he’s lost the EC and he’s going for the popular vote to muddy the waters. (View Post)