moonshine
-
Re: The (lack of) incumbency bonus – politicalbetting.com
That’s all fine. Except some of the most highly cleared people in the US (title 50 level) have given evidence under oath to the effect that the security apparatus of the US has hidden an ultra tech p… (View Post)1 -
Re: The (lack of) incumbency bonus – politicalbetting.com
Forget the Mexican cartels. If he wants to stop fentanyl, he needs to start bombing labs in China. (View Post)1 -
Re: The (lack of) incumbency bonus – politicalbetting.com
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/nov/08/relationship-between-uk-and-ukraine-has-worsened-since-labour-won-election Bring back Boris (View Post)1 -
Re: The (lack of) incumbency bonus – politicalbetting.com
Even if that turns out to be true, it’s notable that the likes of Schumer and Rubio are giving a very different impression. Why? It’s not because they’re morons. They’ve had +40 people testify under … (View Post)1 -
Re: Split ticketing is still real – politicalbetting.com
If you were to go to the Bat Action Trust and offer them £100m to spend as they liked on bat preservation activities, I reckon the net benefit to bats would still have been better than that tunnel. E… (View Post)1