maxh
-
Re: Starmer is eminently beatable – politicalbetting.com
algakirk is saying that the rest of us are responsible for the outcome, not that we have a responsibility to change it. There's no judgement in the post as I read it, just a statement of fact. T… (View Post)1 -
Re: In the VI polling, there’s been a marked shift to LAB – politicalbetting.com
@Cyclefree (and others) I want to ask a question that could easily come across as a dig - I promise it isn't (but this is one of those debates that gets heated easily and things get misconstrued… (View Post)1 -
Re: The Daily Star sums it up perfectly – politicalbetting.com
One of the more interesting aspects of this debate is the heat that is generated around the idea of fragility (usually pre-faced by the word 'white'). Considered through one lens, the respo… (View Post)5 -
Re: The cabinet are revolting as they prepare to get their Johnson out. – politicalbetting.com
I'm probably missing something (I dabble in the betting side of politics, but hold my hands up as a rank amateur). Isn't Raab at 20/1 value for next PM? If Bojo goes tomorrow, surely he won… (View Post)2 -
Re: The data the advocates of a “progressive alliance” ignore – politicalbetting.com
Thanks @Sandpit - informative. I think I agree - what you say balances family autonomy with state interference. (View Post)1