maaarsh
-
Re: One Woman’s Perspective – politicalbetting.com
In crude terms, men are more likely to select for physical attractiveness, and women are more likely to select for status. Worked absolutely fine when men were the breadwinners. Now we have a more eq… (View Post)1 -
Re: One Woman’s Perspective – politicalbetting.com
The 4 criteria are undefined nonsense. Just a fig leaf to claim they've been open whilst keeping the decisions entirely opaque and discretionary. (View Post)1 -
Re: One Woman’s Perspective – politicalbetting.com
Pleasantly surprised that didn't happen this week - although clearly the cases number has been pumped up, it hasn't gone backwards. LFD positives were 2/3rds confirmed by PCR a month ago. N… (View Post)2 -
Re: After the damaging spat with Salmond can Sturgeon lead the SNP to a Holyrood majority on May 4th? –
138 deaths reported in England today. 47 of those were over 3 weeks old in terms of actual date of death, including 3 from last year. Same as false positives will fog up cases, the big lags are going… (View Post)2 -
Re: Punters now make it a 66% chance that Brian Rose will get less than 2% in the London Mayoral race –
Nice to hear they agree identities are immutable and can't be changed because people choose - I'm sure they'll be entirely consistent in this view. (View Post)3