kamski
-
Re: The resistible force meets the movable object – politicalbetting.com
So you would be in favour of increasing VAT? Which seems to have the same effect, but without the disadvantage of losing the efficiency savings of comparative advantage, unlike imposing indiscriminat… (View Post)1 -
Re: The resistible force meets the movable object – politicalbetting.com
I could give you one. (View Post)3 -
Re: The resistible force meets the movable object – politicalbetting.com
It's interesting but China isn't there. I'm actually very surprised there aren't majorities saying "neither" but maybe that wasn't an option. Suspect countries with… (View Post)1 -
Re: The resistible force meets the movable object – politicalbetting.com
Agree that all pyramids are shit. (View Post)1 -
Re: The resistible force meets the movable object – politicalbetting.com
Well exactly - @sandpit's 'suggestions' that USAID officials are 'refusing to co-operate with anyone in Trump's team' is a very dishonest way of describing the situation. (View Post)4