kamski
-
Re: Punters think Lab’s chances of winning most seats at the GE have improved – politicalbetting.com
It was joke! - though you'd need to read the previous thread to get it A bit of banter is fine, and can be fun. But the site's owners have to trust people to follow the rules, otherwise it becomes im… (View Post)1 -
Re: Punters think Lab’s chances of winning most seats at the GE have improved – politicalbetting.com
Not really. Here's his latest show on the subject (25th Feb): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utl2uLh1wVI The Daily Show's description: "Jon Stewart dives into Trump's new Department of Governme… (View Post)3 -
Re: Yesterday, February 28, 2025, a date which will live in infamy – politicalbetting.com
I don't think anything, haven't done the maths, nor studied the genetics. I'm trusting the authors Peter Ralph and Graham Coop's conclusions: "What did you find? There is a lot of information in… (View Post)1 -
Re: Yesterday, February 28, 2025, a date which will live in infamy – politicalbetting.com
The mathematical evidence used modelling of realistic heritage. You'd have to point out which of the model's assumptions are wrong. For example in Chang's paper here http://www.stat.yale.edu/%7Ejtc5/… (View Post)1 -
Re: Yesterday, February 28, 2025, a date which will live in infamy – politicalbetting.com
There's a competition between LLMs to see which one can be most wrong? Not surprising. AFAIK there is no actual dispute. Did you read this? https://gcbias.org/european-genealogy-faq/ It's actually ve… (View Post)4