isam
-
Re: The widespread notion that LAB can automatically assume 2nd prefs of LDs is not supported by real li
Comparing 2019 GE to yesterday’s By Election, I think the obvious is the most likely - Cons stayed at home and the rest got behind the Lib Dems. The difference between drop in turnout and drop in Con… (View Post)1 -
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
Isn’t this just a case of posh Remain seat going to a Remain party? As Hartlepool was a case of poor working class leave seat going to the Leave party. It’s not a secret that Brexit might cause a rea… (View Post)2 -
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
Yep! (View Post)5 -
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
The tweeter says it was due to "the Maxine"!!! (View Post)2 -
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
Perhaps the Lib Dems will challenge Labour for second place. If Con win B&S, Sir Keir's record in by elections will be lost safe seat, lost deposit, lost safe seat! His fans say LDs doing we… (View Post)1
