isam
-
Re: These elections remind us that leader ratings and supplementaries are a better predictor of electora
I think I agree. A PM with good gross ratings mid term is better than good party VI ratings, because, when it comes to Election campaigns, they are all over the media selling their ideas, and the par… (View Post)1 -
Re: These elections remind us that leader ratings and supplementaries are a better predictor of electora
Theoretically FOM could be a wonderful thing.. is a wonderful thing. But there should have been tests that the countries involved had to pass in order to have access to it, otherwise you end up with … (View Post)2 -
Re: These elections remind us that leader ratings and supplementaries are a better predictor of electora
David Herdson, on twitter the other day, asked "Why should Labour even be 'about' the 'working class' (whatever that means)? Why not define itself by values and ideology inst… (View Post)1 -
Re: These elections remind us that leader ratings and supplementaries are a better predictor of electora
The stick I got when I first said Starmer was too dull to succeed vs Boris! IPSOS-MORI should be along with their personality ratings in the next month, so far Boris has won 64-30 (when Con VI lead w… (View Post)1 -
Re: These elections remind us that leader ratings and supplementaries are a better predictor of electora
Beware the optical illusion of net ratings, they turn a blanket from wet to comfort http://aboutasfarasdelgados.blogspot.com/2021/03/the-optical-illusion-of-net-ratings.html (View Post)2
