isam
-
Re: Labour v. The Greens – politicalbetting.com
Your last paragraph reinforces my belief that changing PM without a GE should be a much more difficult thing to do. If it wasn’t an option, parties would have to stick together and perhaps be encoura… (View Post)1 -
Re: Labour v. The Greens – politicalbetting.com
I saw the headline and thought about what price it would be… and my thought was 1/8, 9/2! Showing my age with that big over round (View Post)1 -
Re: Labour v. The Greens – politicalbetting.com
Re Labour’s ‘Ming Vase’ strategy; it worked up to a point, they won a huge majority, but it didn’t get them any new votes. Amidst the relief that Starmer and the grown ups were back in charge, too ma… (View Post)3 -
Re: Why Starmer might be more popular than Labour – politicalbetting.com
It’s a bit like divorce; if divorcing wasn’t an option people might work harder to save their marriage. If replacing a PM meant a GE, governments might find common cause rather than undermine their l… (View Post)1 -
Re: Why Starmer might be more popular than Labour – politicalbetting.com
Much as I dislike Sir Keir, I find Westminster gossip undermining, or potentially bringing down, a PM a bit silly. That said, if he is replaced, I think there should be a GE. I thought this when the … (View Post)3
