isam
-
Re: These elections remind us that leader ratings and supplementaries are a better predictor of electora
Yes. I campaigned for UKIP in 2014 and 2015, and immigration was pretty much all the voters wanted us to do something about. FOM was really the only thing the EU did that people noticed changing in t… (View Post)1 -
Re: These elections remind us that leader ratings and supplementaries are a better predictor of electora
I think I agree. A PM with good gross ratings mid term is better than good party VI ratings, because, when it comes to Election campaigns, they are all over the media selling their ideas, and the par… (View Post)1 -
Re: These elections remind us that leader ratings and supplementaries are a better predictor of electora
Theoretically FOM could be a wonderful thing.. is a wonderful thing. But there should have been tests that the countries involved had to pass in order to have access to it, otherwise you end up with … (View Post)2 -
Re: These elections remind us that leader ratings and supplementaries are a better predictor of electora
David Herdson, on twitter the other day, asked "Why should Labour even be 'about' the 'working class' (whatever that means)? Why not define itself by values and ideology inst… (View Post)1 -
Re: These elections remind us that leader ratings and supplementaries are a better predictor of electora
The stick I got when I first said Starmer was too dull to succeed vs Boris! IPSOS-MORI should be along with their personality ratings in the next month, so far Boris has won 64-30 (when Con VI lead w… (View Post)1
