eek
eek
Reactions
-
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
Going back to Reform's DOGE The review will look at contractual arrangements with suppliers and consultants, all capital expenditure, any off-book or contingent liabilities, the use of reserves … (View Post)3 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
So tell me what world class software engineers have to do with auditing what work is done - it's a set of buzz words designed to make it look like something clever is being done - when reality i… (View Post)5 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
Love to know who is going to pay them because it can't be Kent County Council - there would need to follow a procuement process that that group definitely wouldn't meet the criteria to ente… (View Post)4 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
The problem is that passports are the easiest way to proof right to work but getting a passport is complex if you don't already have your initial one.. (View Post)1 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
In Durham - it's hard to say 100% but it seems voting levels were roughly the same to 2021.. (View Post)1
