edmundintokyo
-
Re: When will Rachel Reeves cease to be Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
Value from those: Pritzker seems to be playing the moment effectively. Feisty opposition but with gravitas. Harris seems like she wants to run as she's doing a lot of media and the Dems usually pick … (View Post)1 -
Re: When will Rachel Reeves cease to be Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
SCOTUS can do whatever they like. Suppose Trump was on the ballot (SCOTUS ruled that states had to list him even if they think he's ineligible, they already decided this previously over the insurrect… (View Post)1 -
Re: When will Rachel Reeves cease to be Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
Obama can't win Calvinball against the Supreme Court. I think it's unlikely to happen but if it does it could look something like this: - Republicans push some spurious legal theory about the term li… (View Post)1 -
Re: When will Rachel Reeves cease to be Chancellor? – politicalbetting.com
FPT This is classic Innovator's Dilemma stuff. The incumbents have great engineers, they know the new thing is coming, and they know how to make the new thing. But all the short-term incentives of th… (View Post)3 -
Re: The game’s afoot as Burnham wants to be the new Lord Home – politicalbetting.com
If Burnham did engineer a vacancy, would the NEC have the power to go, "ok cool, all-women shortlist"? (View Post)2
