edmundintokyo
-
Re: Of talking dogs and politicians – politicalbetting.com
I think you have to draw a line at the appropriate point in the stack. Twitter banning Trump, or anyone else for whatever reason they like, seems fine to me. If you don't like it, use another we… (View Post)4 -
Re: Of talking dogs and politicians – politicalbetting.com
I don't know what a "conventional" coup looks like, as they're all different and many attempts are full of stupidity, miscalculation and weird accidents. But the allegation is: 1)… (View Post)2 -
Re: Why ambitious Republicans might back impeach Trump moves – politicalbetting.com
I think Twitter is right to ban Trump. Incitement to violence is the correct line where freedom of speech stops, and it's pretty clear that's what he's using their platform for. Twitte… (View Post)1 -
Re: Why ambitious Republicans might back impeach Trump moves – politicalbetting.com
So on topic, does this seem like a correct read? 1) There are 12 days left. 2) The House will probably impeach, but it'll take them at least a week, so there will be like 7 days left 3) The Sena… (View Post)2 -
Re: Why ambitious Republicans might back impeach Trump moves – politicalbetting.com
I think this is the same line that would be enforced by a British court, ie incitement to violence is a standard and generally-accepted category of bannable speech, but violence by a *government* gen… (View Post)1
