david_herdson
-
Re: Why I’m not convinced by LAB’S double digit poll leads – politicalbetting.com
No chance. I'm happy in the Yorkshire Party and have no desire to return to the toxic brew that is, and is very likely to remain, the Tory Party over the next 7-10 years, at least. Besides, ther… (View Post)11 -
Re: Why I’m not convinced by LAB’S double digit poll leads – politicalbetting.com
On topic, I disagree with Mike. That 16% now backing Lab is huge - and runs very counter to a long period where there was almost no net Con-Lab swing (leads being the result more of swings within lef… (View Post)11 -
Re: Punters rate Trump as a 23.8% chance to win WH2024 – politicalbetting.com
That's missing the point that he wouldn't have suffered an 'election defeat'. If Congress certified him the winner then, constitutionally, he would be the winner. The Electoral Co… (View Post)1 -
Re: Punters rate Trump as a 23.8% chance to win WH2024 – politicalbetting.com
Three days after Mike's article "A THING OF THE PAST – LAB LEADS OF 20%+?" (Unless DeltaPoll surprise us, I don't see any 30-point lead. Labour has had a small uptick since the lo… (View Post)3 -
Re: Punters rate Trump as a 23.8% chance to win WH2024 – politicalbetting.com
It was only restored because Trump failed to plan it properly. Had the mob had a plan, with leadership, then 'hostile' elements of Congress could have been held hostage (or worse) while the… (View Post)2