david_herdson
-
Re: Sir Gavin Williamson speaks for the Tories and the nation – politicalbetting.com
Actually, we had the argument 114 years ago and the 1911 Parliament Act includes the following by way of introduction: "it is intended to substitute for the House of Lords as it at present exist… (View Post)2 -
Re: Sir Gavin Williamson speaks for the Tories and the nation – politicalbetting.com
But mainly because he thinks he's playing 4D chess when in fact he's tripped himself up running an egg-and-spoon race. There is an argument that removing the bishops opens up a whole can of worms abo… (View Post)1 -
Re: Last night’s debate brings no happy ending for Bobby J – politicalbetting.com
That's not new; it's a continuation of Trump's policy from 2017-21 when he demanded that US 'allies' pay cost + 50% for the forces stationed in their country. But that's big picture stuff and can be … (View Post)1 -
Re: Last night’s debate brings no happy ending for Bobby J – politicalbetting.com
I think he genuinely thinks they're a tax on foreigners and also a boost for domestic producers: a win-win. He will use them as leverage but he'll also want to impose them for their own sake. To be h… (View Post)1 -
Re: Last night’s debate brings no happy ending for Bobby J – politicalbetting.com
1. Infrastructure costs a fortune to deliver because: a. Land is so expensive, because b. Planning is so restrictive, and, relatedly, c. The planning process takes forever, hence d. Legal costs are s… (View Post)2