david_herdson
-
Re: Why the Tories have LESS than a 90% chance of winning the Chesham and Amersham by-election – politic
Is that right? If Le Pen was capable of hitting 50% in a presidential election, then you'd think she'd be able to back that up in parliamentary ones shortly after. I know 2017 went catastro… (View Post)2 -
Re: Why the Tories have LESS than a 90% chance of winning the Chesham and Amersham by-election – politic
That coalition was one led by Cameron who had conciously moved the Tories to the centre on social policy (which was one thing that gave UKIP space to grow on the right). But more importantly (apart f… (View Post)2 -
Re: Why the Tories have LESS than a 90% chance of winning the Chesham and Amersham by-election – politic
If people are fool enough to pay that then that's their business. But personally, a glass a drink wouldn't make any difference one way or the other. (View Post)1 -
Re: Why the Tories have LESS than a 90% chance of winning the Chesham and Amersham by-election – politic
It's an aeroplane. I've only flown business once and first-class never (the business was an upgrade) but free champagne is just tacky. (View Post)3 -
Re: Why the Tories have LESS than a 90% chance of winning the Chesham and Amersham by-election – politic
Hmm. 90%+ is certainly high but while this was a Remain seat in 2016, it was only so by 55-45. No doubt the Lib Dems will throw the kitchen sink at the seat so that they can wilfully mislead themselv… (View Post)3