checklist
-
Re: Holyrood’s shame – politicalbetting.com
Revisit your own post of 11.10 which suggests 4 times in 2 paragraphs that we should generalise about "this sort of story," and now that turns out to be a "bizarre mindset." Which? (View Post)1 -
Re: Holyrood’s shame – politicalbetting.com
Ok, q for all the just a lot of lefty nonsense theorists: Mountbatten Kincora, yes or no? (View Post)2 -
Re: Holyrood’s shame – politicalbetting.com
No, that's an abject fail. You are the one trying to generalise ("like so many stories" twice in your post), I am offering a specific counterexample to suggest that generalising sucks. You … (View Post)1 -
Re: Holyrood’s shame – politicalbetting.com
Golly. The Duke of Pork shelling out 12 large and pore ole Ghislaine getting 200 years is not enough to convince the unconvinceable that sex trading rings of the rich and powerful are a thing (View Post)2 -
Re: Holyrood’s shame – politicalbetting.com
Your point is incoherent but I don't think Rolf Harris actually supports it (View Post)1