No, the court has said that there is a test of scale that has always been used. Quoting one line of statute does not mean you understand the law in full. (View Post)

The jury failed to reach a decision on that particular charge, didn't they? (View Post)

No, the judgment https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/huda-ammori-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-3/ says that "“Concerned in terrorism” is defined at section 3(5) of the 2000 Act&quo… (View Post)

The court noted that there are laws against wielding sledgehammers etc. without resorting to the Terrorism Act 2000. (View Post)

Is it not the role of the courts to interpret what laws mean? (View Post)